How many hours a week should a college student study

Where the two-hour rule comes from

The number most advisors quote is written into US federal regulation. Under 34 CFR 600.2, the Department of Education's definition of a credit hour is an amount of work that reasonably approximates not less than one hour of classroom or direct faculty instruction and a minimum of two hours of out-of-class student work each week, for approximately fifteen weeks for one semester or trimester hour of credit, or ten to twelve weeks for one quarter hour.

Colleges use that definition to justify the credits they award, and study-skills advice turned it into a rule of thumb: two hours outside class for every hour in it. Writing in Faculty Focus in 2017, Lolita Paff suggested the idea likely dates back to around 1909, when the Carnegie Unit became the accepted measure of class time.

Two details are easy to miss. The regulation describes a minimum amount of work that a credit should approximate, not a target for any one student. And it allows "the equivalent amount of work over a different period of time," which is why compressed and summer courses ask for more hours per week.

Doing the math for your own schedule

Applied to a standard semester, the rule is simple multiplication. A three-credit course means about three hours in class and six hours of reading, problem sets, and review each week. Twelve credits add up to about 24 hours outside class; fifteen credits to about 30. Put the 15 hours of class back in and a full load looks like a 45-hour week.

Shorter terms squeeze the same work into fewer weeks. ASU Online, which runs seven-and-a-half-week sessions, tells students to plan about six hours a week for each credit hour, which works out to roughly 18 hours a week for a single three-credit course. Quarter-system schools sit in between, since the federal definition spreads a quarter hour over ten to twelve weeks.

Daily targets follow from the weekly one. Thirty hours spread over six days is five hours a day; over seven days it is a little over four. Most people find a daily number easier to act on than a weekly one, because a missed Monday is visible on Monday rather than on Sunday night.

What students actually report

Survey data puts real study time well below the formula. The 2011 National Survey of Student Engagement, which covered about 416,000 first-year students and seniors at 673 US colleges and universities, found that full-time students study about 15 hours a week on average, according to a Faculty Focus summary of the results. Engineering seniors reported about 19 hours, while social sciences and business seniors reported around 14.

The same summary noted a gap between expectation and practice: social sciences faculty expected about four more hours per week than the average social sciences senior reported. NSSE's own analysis of 2014 data found seniors ranging from 12 hours a week in communications, media, and public relations to 19 hours a week in engineering.

The long-run trend points the same way. In their report "Leisure College, USA," published by the American Enterprise Institute in 2010, Philip Babcock and Mindy Marks found that the average full-time student at a four-year US college studied about 24 hours a week in 1961, while the modern student in their data put in only about 14.

Why hours are only half the answer

Time is a budget, and what you buy with it matters more. In a 2013 review, Kent State University psychologist John Dunlosky and colleagues rated the efficacy of ten common study techniques. Writing for American Educator, Dunlosky explained that practice testing and distributed practice were rated the most effective because they help students of different ages, work across many kinds of material, and boost achievement. Rereading had inconsistent effects, and highlighting failed to help learners ranging from Air Force trainees to children and undergraduates.

Spacing changes the value of the same hours. According to the same article, students retain knowledge and skills longer when they distribute their practice than when they mass it, even when the total time is identical. Six hours spread across four days does more than a single six-hour Sunday.

Paff makes a similar argument from the teaching side: shift the focus from time to task. Use the two-hour rule to block out enough time in your week, then fill that time with work that makes you retrieve and apply what you learned.

Common mistakes when planning study hours

The most common one is counting time that was not really study. An hour at the desk with messages arriving every few minutes is not an hour of practice, and a vague sense of "I studied all afternoon" usually shrinks once you write down when you started and stopped.

The second is giving every course the same hours. NSSE's data shows a seven-hour weekly gap between majors, and the same student can need far more time for one course than another. Budget by difficulty, then adjust after the first exam tells you where you actually stand.

The third is treating the weekly number as something to make up at the end. Thirty hours crammed into a weekend is both exhausting and, by the spacing research above, less effective than the same hours spread out. A daily target catches a shortfall while there is still time to fix it.

Keeping an honest count

The simplest fix is a timer you start only when the real work starts and stop when it stops. After two or three weeks you have an actual average to compare with the plan, and you can see which days carry the load and which never do.

If you keep going longer when you know other people are working too, StudyCrew is a group study timer built around that idea. Your friends see when you are studying, the crew shares a ranking for today and the week, and your own daily goal, weekly total, and streak sit on one screen, so the hours you planned and the hours you put in are easy to compare.

Frequently asked questions