Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases6 cases

5 to 6 of 6

  1. Symptoms

    The hub pod of the prod JupyterHub on the leap cluster (leap.2i2c.org) restarted unexpectedly during a large node scale-up, and a user opened a support ticket. The ingress-nginx and proxy pods kept running.

    Trigger

    A user's dask-gateway workload added about 100 dask-worker nodes within a minute, and Prometheus started scraping the metrics exporters on about 200 nodes.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A user support ticket (2i2c Freshdesk ticket 414) about the leap hub; the engineer then looked at Grafana and the cluster's nodes and events.

    Action items
    • Configure CPU and memory requests for the hub and proxy pods (#2127; at least 100m CPU was proposed)
    • Make the Grafana OOMKiller dashboard work (#2213)
    • Move LEAP cloud infrastructure to shared nodes (#2209)
    • Update resource requests and limits, mainly for ingress-nginx and Prometheus (#2324)
    • Decide whether Prometheus should scrape dask worker pods (#2366)
    Lessons

    Prometheus load grows with the number of nodes, so a burst of autoscaled nodes can push a nearly full core node over the edge and evict the pods that matter most. Core pods that request 10m of CPU get a tenth of the CPU share of busy neighbours that request 100m. Kubernetes events expire after an hour, so evidence of OOM kills needs a dashboard that keeps it.

  2. Symptoms

    One Monday morning the author opened the Prometheus dashboard to check a Kubernetes cluster for alerts and could not reach it. The Prometheus pod was in CrashLoopBackOff: kubectl get pods showed it 1/2 ready with 950 restarts over 3d20h on worker3.

    Trigger

    After start, the Prometheus time series count rose to 2,162,256 within five minutes and its memory use filled the 8GB host.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The author found it on a Monday morning when the Prometheus dashboard, opened to check the cluster for alerts, could not be reached.

    Remediation
    • removed most of the unnecessary settings from the Prometheus ConfigMap, after which the container stopped crashing
    Action items
    • Set appropriate resource requests and limits on the Prometheus pod
    • Reduce unneeded metrics by adjusting scrape targets or scrape interval
    • Estimate Prometheus memory needs, provide dedicated hosts with a node label such as deploy-topology: Prometheus, and pin the Prometheus pod to them with a nodeSelector
    Lessons

    Exit code 137 together with an OOM event in the kubelet log means the kernel killed the container, not kubelet. Under node memory pressure the kernel kills the process with the highest score, and kubelet derives each container's oom_score_adj from the pod's QoS class: a container without a memory request in a pod where another container has one ends up Burstable with a score near 1000, so it is killed first. In a large cluster, Prometheus memory needs to be estimated from the expected series count and requested explicitly.

Check your cluster for this

These 6 cases involve Prometheus and Container memory limit. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1