Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases19 cases

9 to 13 of 19

  1. Symptoms

    On 24 October 2024 every BSEE SaaS customer instance showed the Environment Unavailable message, and the SaaS Uptime Over Time metric dropped sharply at 04:45. The Technology Team learned of the outage when the Growth team posted about it at 08:07 and a member of the Product team told the Technology Team verbally at 08:15.

    Trigger

    AWS made Bottlerocket v1.26.0 the latest Bottlerocket AMI in eu-west-1 between 02:00 and 04:30, and at 04:00 Karpenter saw the new version and started replacing the EC2 nodes of the production EKS cluster with it.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The Growth team reported the outage in the BSEE cloud onboarding issues channel at 08:07, and a member of the Product team told the Technology Team verbally at 08:15. The SaaS Uptime Over Time metric had already dropped at 04:45.

    Remediation
    • Reverted all EC2 instances in the SaaS production account to Bottlerocket v1.25.0
    • Deployed Bottlerocket 1.25.0 across all EKS clusters and rolled out new EKS nodes
    Action items
    • Change the Karpenter resources to deploy a specific versioned Bottlerocket AMI instead of the latest released AMI
    • Add the Bottlerocket release ATOM feed to an internal tooling release dashboard
    • Set up a public status page to communicate with customers
  2. Symptoms

    Event ingestion and the Honeycomb UI in EU1 became unavailable at 22:00:10 UTC on April 9, 2024, and the status page reported that the EU1 instance was down. Both the ingestion service and the service behind the web UI stopped at roughly the same moment.

    Trigger

    A routine system update to the Kubernetes cluster, rolled out earlier on April 9, followed by a regular deployment that replaced pods one at a time.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The first status post, saying the EU1 instance was down, went up at 15:08 PDT (22:08 UTC), about 8 minutes after the outage began. There was no alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller.

    Remediation
    • Restarted the AWS Load Balancer Controller
    • Rolled back the Kubernetes cluster system update
    Action items
    • Find the exact cause of the failure so the system update can be deployed safely
    • Add monitoring and alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller so on-call engineers learn of a failure quickly and can pause deployments
    Lessons

    A rolling deployment can look healthy while the component that wires new pods into the load balancer is broken; the failure only shows when the last old pod goes away. Honeycomb now treats the AWS Load Balancer Controller as a critical component that needs its own alerting, so deployments can be paused before they remove the last pods that still receive traffic. Extensive testing in development and staging did not reveal the bad interaction.

  3. Symptoms

    On 2023-05-18 a Slack alert arrived at 20:01 and Istio stopped working properly in the production GKE cluster. The istiod error logs said that the v1beta1.Ingress and v1beta1.ValidatingWebhookConfiguration resources could not be found.

    Trigger

    GKE automatically upgraded the production cluster's control plane from 1.22.17-gke.7500 to 1.23.17-gke.1700 at 19:52 on 2023-05-18.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A Slack alert at 20:01 on 2023-05-18, nine minutes after the control plane upgrade. The istiod error logs showed that the v1beta1 Ingress and ValidatingWebhookConfiguration resources could not be found.

    Remediation
    • upgraded Istio from 1.7.4 to 1.13.3
    Lessons

    The first diagnosis, end of support for Istio, was wrong; the real cause was found by matching the alert time against the cluster's UPGRADE_MASTER operations in Logs Explorer. The author recommends checking the version compatibility matrices of Kubernetes, Istio and other packages, keeping a production version for at least six months and upgrading three months before end of support, keeping the test environment on the latest version, backing up before upgrades, managing deployments and versions with a tool such as Argo CD, and testing upgrades in a test environment before production.

  4. Symptoms

    About two minutes after an engineer started the Kubernetes 1.23 to 1.24 upgrade of the cluster running Reddit's legacy stack, just after 19:00 UTC, the site stopped. The CDN edge request graph, which is kept separate from the cluster, showed traffic by status collapsing. Users saw the error page, a homepage with no posts, or plain errors.

    Trigger

    An in-place upgrade of the legacy cluster from Kubernetes 1.23 to 1.24; in 1.24 the node-role.kubernetes.io/master label is removed even from running clusters.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The site broke about two minutes into the upgrade; an incident was opened immediately and responders were on the call within three minutes, working from CDN edge graphs because the cluster's own metrics were gone.

    Remediation
    • deleted the Open Policy Agent webhook configurations to stop API server timeouts
    • terminated all worker nodes of the cluster
    • restored the control plane from the pre-upgrade backup onto the first control plane node
    • switched off the cluster autoscaler until the control plane was stable
    • generated new TLS certificates so replacement control plane nodes could join etcd
    • brought traffic back in steps from 1% to 100%
    • restarted legacy services that had been stopped by hand
    Action items
    • Codify cluster configuration so every choice has a record, and document in detail what cannot be codified
    • Standardise components across clusters and replace bespoke configurations
    • Build tooling to manage the lifecycle of whole clusters so they can be recreated or replicated
    • Add pre-production clusters that can be tested with confidence
    • Improve the backup restore process and make cluster upgrades safe
    Lessons

    Configuration that exists only in a live cluster, edited by hand through a special tool, can be forgotten, as the route reflector setup was, and then break on an upgrade nobody connects it to. A Kubernetes upgrade cannot be reverted without a restore, so the restore procedure has to be kept current and practised. Consistent, codified clusters are what make upgrades testable; bespoke clusters keep producing outages.

  5. Symptoms

    On 14 March 2023 at about 18:00 UTC, communication errors rose on one CircleCI service, and pipelines for all customers began to start late until jobs did not run at all. Within an hour the errors had spread to many services and to every function of the application, including the CircleCI UI and API.

    Trigger

    At about 17:40 UTC on 14 March the infrastructure team resumed the upgrade of the main production Kubernetes cluster with a changed approach for some components, after a first attempt on 13 March had been rolled back. The ongoing upgrade left kubelet and kube-proxy at mismatched versions.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    At 18:00 UTC engineers saw communication errors rise on one service, then job processing delays climbing and job queues backing up across several services. The kube-proxy "Sync failed" errors were found only in the analysis after the incident.

    Remediation
    • Restarted every node in the cluster so each node built a fresh iptables ruleset
    • Restarted a separate pool of dependencies so jobs using contexts or the machine executor ran again
    • Added capacity to work through the backlog of jobs
    • Restarted the RabbitMQ nodes to fix a few corrupted queues
    Action items
    • Improve the Kubernetes upgrade process to limit the risk of future upgrades
    • Add metrics and alerts for kube-proxy sync errors
    • Evaluate ways to make the RabbitMQ infrastructure more resilient
    Lessons

    No single trigger caused the incident. Because networking underlies everything in the cluster, Kubernetes upgrades carry inherent risk, and CircleCI's risk mitigation did not hold up when several events interacted.

Check your cluster for this

These 19 cases involve Ingress controller and Node operating system image. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1

Breaking change in an upgrade19 cases

  1. IL-0097 A cluster autoscaler version bump was incompatible with the one cluster still on Kubernetes 1.33, so no scale-up events fired and new nodes were not created
    2i2c2026
  2. IL-0098 After 2i2c moved from ingress-nginx to nginx-ingress, a hub's Ingress took priority over cert-manager's temporary Ingress for the same host, so new hubs could not get TLS certificates
    2i2c2026
  3. IL-0092 Upgrading ingress-nginx from 1.12.0 to 1.14.3 brought a newer ModSecurity and OWASP Core Rule Set whose false positives blocked HMPPS Auth, so users could not sign in to their applications
  4. IL-0236 After an Istio 1.15 to 1.24 upgrade, half of Wikimedia's ML model servers returned 5XX for about a day
  5. IL-0405 An expired AWS Load Balancer Controller webhook certificate left no healthy targets and took BSEE SaaS down
  6. IL-0101 After Google forced a GKE control plane upgrade to 1.33.2 at a deprecation deadline, no new node could initialise, so autoscaling and spot node replacement stopped for 15 hours
  7. IL-0079 A GKE node auto-upgrade to an ubuntu_containerd image with a kernel regression left kube-proxy unable to apply its ip6tables rules, so load balancer health checks failed and several clusters lost all ingress traffic
  8. IL-0201 A framework upgrade caused kernel panics in GitHub's Kubernetes infrastructure, and GitHub.com web and API requests, mostly for issues and pull requests, failed intermittently for about 16 hours
    GitHub2025
  9. IL-0404 All BSEE SaaS customer pods on EKS crash-looped after Karpenter moved nodes to Bottlerocket v1.26.0, which broke Java
  10. IL-0203 A routine Kubernetes cluster system update made the AWS Load Balancer Controller fail, so new pods were never registered with the ALB and Honeycomb's EU1 ingest and UI went down once the last old pods were replaced
  11. IL-0180 A GKE control plane auto-upgrade from 1.22 to 1.23 removed the v1beta1 Ingress and ValidatingWebhookConfiguration APIs that Istio 1.7.4 still used, and Istio stopped working in production
  12. IL-0060 Kubernetes 1.24 upgrade removed the master node label that Calico route reflectors selected on, dropping all pod routes and taking Reddit down for 314 minutes
    Reddit2023
  13. IL-0230 kube-proxy sync failures during a Kubernetes upgrade corrupted node iptables, and CircleCI jobs stopped starting
  14. IL-0198 An automatic Ubuntu security update restarted systemd-networkd, which flushed the IP rules Cilium relied on and cut more than 60 percent of Datadog's Kubernetes nodes off the network across regions and cloud providers
  15. IL-0144 A systemd security update installed by unattended-upgrades lost the DNS configuration of Ubuntu 18.04 VMs, so AKS kubelets could not resolve registry names and pods failed with ImagePullBackOff
  16. IL-0501 Every node of the UToronto Kubernetes cluster on Azure went NotReady and the JupyterHub became unreachable
    2i2c2022
  17. IL-0522 An ingress-nginx chart upgrade deleted the jenkins.io Ingress and Fastly served HTTP/503 errors for hours
  18. IL-0090 After an upgrade of the ModSec ingress controller module, its validating webhook served a certificate for the wrong service name and blocked every Ingress create and change
  19. IL-0449 Pods on Enigmo's new EKS managed node groups kept restarting or stuck Terminating and the nodes became unusable
    Enigmo2020