Cases52 cases

2 to 6 of 52

1. IL-0102 CoreDNS pods on a production EKS cluster ran out of memory under a burst of new pods, endpoints and nodes, taking down the Buildkite web UI, APIs and job dispatch

   Buildkite2026

   Symptoms

   From 22:47 UTC on 25 August 2026 the Buildkite web interface, REST API, Agent API, job queue and notifications stopped working for every customer. No one could create a build from the UI or the REST API, job dispatch was delayed, and some builds that were already running when the outage began stayed stuck until the services recovered.

   Service outageDNS resolution failuresOOMKilledAutoscaler misbehaviour

   Trigger

   At 22:44 UTC an application deploy created a surge of new pods, which used up the free capacity on the existing nodes and made the EKS cluster scale out. Background worker pools with unusually high maximum replica counts were scaling out at the same time and kept asking for more pods while new nodes were still being provisioned. Together they produced an unusually high rate of change in applications, network endpoints and nodes, and with it a sudden rise in demand on CoreDNS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CoreDNSContainer memory limitHorizontal pod autoscalerNode pool

   Contributing factor

   No headroomAutomation amplificationRetry stormMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The first status post, at 22:55 UTC, eight minutes after the outage began, said something had gone wrong, and at 23:05 UTC the status page said a sitewide outage was being investigated. CoreDNS query duration had been rising as the cluster grew, but a defect in a key monitoring query and too little monitoring of query volume meant this went unnoticed before the outage.

   Remediation

   • paused further application deploys
   • scaled CoreDNS from three to twelve pods
   • raised each CoreDNS pod's memory limit from 512 MiB to 2 GiB
   • expanded the system node pool that runs CoreDNS

   Action items

   • Increase immediate CoreDNS headroom: twelve pods instead of three, a 2 GiB memory limit instead of 512 MiB, and a larger system node pool
   • Enable EKS-managed CoreDNS autoscaling with a tested minimum replica count and enough capacity to spread the replicas across nodes and availability zones
   • Add direct alerts on CoreDNS query duration, query volume, goroutine growth, memory pressure, OOM restarts and available replicas, and track longer-term trends in capacity planning
   • Find other cluster-critical services that lack tested capacity, direct alerting, spread across failure domains, and either safe autoscaling or documented static headroom, and fix them

   Lessons

   A CoreDNS deployment sized once and left at a fixed size can carry a growing cluster for months and then fail on the first burst of churn it cannot absorb. When query processing slows, pending queries take up memory, the pods hit their limits and restart, and client retries keep the service down after the restart. Server-side DNS query duration and volume need their own alerts: here client-side latency was masked by unrelated application speed-ups, and a broken monitoring query hid the server-side trend. Maximum replica counts raised as a temporary measure remove the cap that normally stops runaway scaling when new nodes are slow to arrive.

   View case
2. IL-0133 A storm shut down cooling at Nebius's us-central1 data center, and a disk hot-plug bug kept Managed Kubernetes control planes down for hours after power returned

   Nebius2026

   Symptoms

   On 19 August 2026 the first equipment-level signs in Nebius's us-central1 region appeared around 09:40 UTC: the InfiniBand fabric degraded and GPU over-temperature alerts began to accumulate. Customer reports followed shortly after 10:00. At 10:15 on-call engineers were paged on critical component temperature alerts, and the incident was declared at 10:21.

   Control plane unresponsiveService outageMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A storm-related event at the data center building took the building management system offline and shut down the chilled-water cooling loop.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Data center power and coolingCloud block storageetcdInfiniBand fabric

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureMonitoring blind spotNo alert on limitNo runbookOverlapping failures

   Detection

   No facility-level alert fired, because the storm also disabled the building management system that monitors the facility. Engineers acted on component over-temperature alerts that paged on-call at 10:15 UTC, after InfiniBand degradation, GPU over-temperature alerts and customer reports; the temperature rise from about 09:15 was visible on dashboards but had no alert.

   Remediation

   • had the facility operator switch cooling to manual bypass mode and opened rack rear doors to vent heat
   • re-energised tripped racks, control-plane racks first
   • restored the regional infrastructure control plane by manual intervention
   • restarted block-storage host components to clear stale disk attachment state
   • raised the VM recovery rate limits by hand for the region-scale recovery
   • started the affected Managed Kubernetes control-plane instances by hand
   • applied a controlled stop and start to control-plane instances whose data disk had been left unattached
   • identified and started 104 customer VMs that the incident had stopped

   Action items

   • Complete a joint resilience review with the facility operator covering redundancy of facility-management and monitoring systems, cooling that keeps running when those fail, electrical protection of cooling equipment and on-site response
   • Add facility-level environmental alerting on cooling plant state and room temperature trend that pages on-call independently of the building management system
   • Set up a documented emergency escalation path with the facility operator, with an on-call contact tree and guaranteed response times
   • Define an emergency heat-load reduction procedure with criteria, ownership and mechanics for shutting down or degrading workloads during a cooling loss
   • Establish a dependency-ordered region cold-start procedure with clear ownership for each service layer
   • Run regular region-scale recovery drills that cover VMs, storage attachments and Managed Kubernetes clusters
   • Fix the disk-attachment bug that extended the Managed Kubernetes outage and deploy the fix to all production regions
   • Improve the recovery policies Compute users can configure, and move all Managed Kubernetes control-plane nodes to the improved policy
   • Automate reconciliation of stale storage attachment state after abrupt host failures
   • Remove in-region dependencies from monitoring startup and recovery, and extend cross-region monitoring
   • Make regional health checks used for global traffic management reflect real service availability

   Lessons

   Facility monitoring that runs on the same system it watches goes silent in exactly the failure it should report, and with no alert on the room temperature trend there was no practical window to shed heat load in a controlled way. A cold start of a whole region exercised recovery paths built for isolated failures: single-attempt VM recovery, conservative rate limits and stale disk attachments all needed manual work. The longest part of the outage was restoring customer resources, Managed Kubernetes control planes above all, so Nebius is extending its recovery drills to that layer.

   View case
3. IL-0512 xpro.mit.edu returned 503 for an hour when its Kubernetes/APISIX origin certificate expired after renewal failed

   MIT Open Learning2026sev1

   Symptoms

   At 3:38 PM EDT on 3 June 2026, alerts fired because both the xPRO production CMS and the main xPRO site at https://xpro.mit.edu were returning 503 errors. Fastly, in front of the site, could not connect to the Kubernetes/APISIX origin, because the origin certificate for xpro-web.odl.mit.edu had expired at 3:29 PM EDT.

   Service outageTLS certificate errors

   Trigger

   The origin certificate xpro-cert for xpro-web.odl.mit.edu, issued on 2026-03-05 with a 90-day validity period, expired at 3:29 PM EDT on 3 June 2026.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   cert-managerCDN and edge networkAuthoritative DNS servers and records

   Contributing factor

   No configuration testsMonitoring blind spotChange with a delayed effect

   Detection

   Alerts for the xPRO production CMS and the main xPRO site fired at 3:38 PM EDT on the 503 errors, and a Rootly incident was created at 4:08 PM EDT.

   Remediation

   • Deleted and recreated the stale cert-manager certificate resources so that cert-manager issued a fresh origin certificate

   Action items

   • Remove the backend origin domain from the non-OpenEdX xPRO Fastly TLS subscription, so Fastly manages only xpro.mit.edu
   • Deploy the Pulumi update for the xPRO application in Production
   • Trigger cert-manager renewal of the xPRO certificate after the conflicting Fastly validation CNAME is removed
   • Consider tests or policy checks that keep cert-manager-managed origin domains out of Fastly TLS subscriptions
   • Consider alerting earlier on failed cert-manager CertificateRequests and Orders, so stale ACME failures are found before the certificate expires

   Lessons

   Reading the outage as a failed cert-manager ACME renewal was true but incomplete; the missing part was that Fastly had been set to manage validation for a backend origin domain that belonged to cert-manager. The team concluded that TLS certificates and DNS validation records need guardrails around ownership, and that public Fastly frontend domains and Kubernetes/APISIX origin domains must not be treated as interchangeable service domains in TLS automation.

   View case
4. IL-0200 Newly provisioned Kubernetes nodes ran an incompatible etcd version and broke cluster consensus in several GitHub production clusters, causing 5XX errors on Git operations and page loads

   GitHub2026

   Symptoms

   From 01:36 UTC on 12 March 2026, GitHub.com returned elevated error rates for Git operations, web requests and related services. At 01:54 UTC the GitHub status page said it was investigating reports of impacted performance for some services.

   High error rate

   Trigger

   During a planned infrastructure upgrade, a configuration issue made newly provisioned Kubernetes nodes run an incompatible version of etcd.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   etcd

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The status page opened the incident at 01:54 UTC, 18 minutes after errors began, citing reports of impacted performance.

   Remediation

   • paused deployments for the duration of the incident
   • identified the newly provisioned nodes running the incompatible etcd version and removed them, which restored cluster consensus
   • ran a validation deploy that confirmed all systems were healthy before resuming normal operations

   Action items

   • Enforce version compatibility programmatically during node replacements
   • Add monitoring that detects split-brain conditions earlier
   • Update the recovery tooling to reduce restoration time

   View case
5. IL-0181 A traffic spike from an external community post pushed product API pods into CPU throttling under a 1-core limit, and an e-commerce product page slowed down while every pod stayed Running

   Kevin2026

   Symptoms

   An e-commerce platform suddenly became slow to respond, worst on the product lookup page, and users began reporting that the page would not open.

   CPU throttlingHigh latency

   Trigger

   A post on the external community Ppomppu linked to the platform and brought a large number of users in a short time, who called the product lookup API heavily.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Container CPU limitHorizontal pod autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Users reported that the product page would not open. The dashboard showed all pods Running, and the namespace CPU usage near 100% and the CPU usage metrics pointed to throttling.

   Remediation

   • raised the HPA minReplicas from 5 to 10
   • raised the container CPU limit from 1 core to 2 cores

   Action items

   • Keep adjusting the CPU limit to a suitable level through monitoring

   Lessons

   CPU throttling is hard to notice: pods stay Running, nothing restarts and the logs show no clear error, so a pod list does not reveal it and CPU usage metrics do. Settings that had handled expected event traffic became the bottleneck as soon as one external post multiplied the traffic. The author concludes that the team needs more preparation for traffic pattern changes and more thought about resource settings.

   View case

By root cause9