Cases9 cases

2 to 6 of 9

1. IL-0100 PostHog's feature flags pods were packed onto Kubernetes nodes that were too small for their CPU requests, and CPU saturation above 90% caused three outages in ten days through Redis overload, connection pool exhaustion and slow queries

   PostHog2025

   Symptoms

   On 21 October 2025 at 21:45 UTC a change to timeout handling was deployed to the feature flags service, and two minutes later automated monitoring reported higher error rates. The change was rolled back by 21:49, but error rates stayed high: about 38% of flag evaluation requests in the US datacenter returned errors. At 22:30 Redis metrics showed memory exhaustion on ElastiCache, at 22:35 Postgres connections spiked, and at 22:45 the team found a massive data transfer from Postgres into Redis. The main PostHog application was affected as well, because it shares the Redis instance with the flags service.

   Sustained high node CPUHigh error rateHigh latencyContainer crash loopDatabase overload

   Trigger

   On 21 October a deployment meant to reduce timeout errors (PR #39821); on 24 October the deployment of IP-based rate limiting (PR #40074) that saw all traffic as coming from the load balancer's IP; on 28 October an unrelated routine deployment that rolled the feature flag pods in the US region.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Node poolPod scheduling and placementIn-memory cacheDatabase

   Contributing factor

   No alert on limitRetry stormIneffective rollbackSingle point of failureNo staged rolloutUnrepresentative staging

   Detection

   On 21 October automated monitoring detected higher error rates two minutes after the deploy. On 24 October no alert existed for 429 errors, and the team learned of the incident from customer reports that began at 18:10 UTC, a 62-minute detection delay. On 28 October on-call received a high error count alert. On 29 October the incident was reported with higher error rates and latency. No alert existed for CPU pressure, so the CPU saturation behind all three incidents was not seen directly.

   Remediation

   • rolled back the timeout handling change within 2 minutes on 21 October, which did not stop the errors
   • throttled connections and Redis writes on 21 October
   • halted the rollout on 28 October, scaled the US flags pods to zero until Redis recovered, then scaled them back gradually
   • rolled back hardware changes on 30 October at 00:03 UTC, which removed most errors but not the latency
   • increased the pod resource requests and adjusted the Kubernetes fleet size so fewer pods ran on each node
   • added retry limits to Envoy between the load balancer and the service
   • moved database connection timeouts and other critical settings to runtime configuration and raised the timeout values
   • added per-node and per-pod CPU alerts at 80% sustained for 5 minutes that page on-call

   Action items

   • Form a strike team from the flags, ingestion and infrastructure teams to review the application and infrastructure for remaining bottlenecks
   • Investigate separating the flags Redis instance from the application Redis instance
   • Before re-enabling ArgoCD sync, align the flags service chart configuration with the values in ArgoCD and define the deployment and Redis strategy
   • Make the feature flags team hard code-owners for flags-related code
   • Build a dashboard of key flag metrics with runbook links and update the feature flag runbooks
   • Add missing alerts on existing service and infrastructure metrics
   • Make readiness checks validate dependencies that degrade under load, for example by pinging the database
   • Rate-limit cache population so it cannot overwhelm Redis
   • Monitor connection pools with automatic throttling near exhaustion and limit concurrent connections
   • Build a production-scale load testing framework
   • Build progressive rollout infrastructure to limit blast radius
   • Document Postgres-to-Redis data flows and write runbooks for data transfer storms

   Lessons

   Nodes that are small relative to pod requests let the scheduler pack many pods on each node, and the resulting CPU saturation showed up three different ways: excessive parallelism, connection pool exhaustion and slow queries. Treating each symptom separately let the problem return; right-sizing the pods and nodes fixed all three. CPU must be alerted on from the start. Unbounded Envoy retries and unbounded cache population amplified the overload, and a Redis instance shared with the main application spread a flags problem to the main application. A rollback did not end the incident, because the data transfer and resource exhaustion it had started kept running.

   View case
2. IL-0101 After Google forced a GKE control plane upgrade to 1.33.2 at a deprecation deadline, no new node could initialise, so autoscaling and spot node replacement stopped for 15 hours

   Wealthy2025sev1

   Symptoms

   Nodes that already existed kept running, but every new node, spot or standard, on either v1.32 or v1.33, failed to initialise and could not join the cluster. Spot nodes that were preempted and recreated never came back, so services degraded progressively: background workers on spot instances, reporting services and order allocation stopped completely, and the APIs on existing nodes kept answering but could not scale for load spikes.

   Scale-up failureContainer crash loopService outageDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   Google upgraded the GKE control plane from v1.32.x to v1.33.2 at the version deprecation deadline, although auto-upgrade was disabled on the node pools.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   GKE control planeNode poolClient-side DNS resolver and cachePersistent volumes and stateful setsConfigMaps and Secrets

   Contributing factor

   Deferred upgradesSingle point of failureIneffective rollbackNo headroom

   Remediation

   • Created a new GKE cluster at v1.33, the version of the forced upgrade
   • Upgraded Istio to 1.27.1 for Kubernetes 1.33 compatibility
   • Updated the cert-manager configuration for Kubernetes 1.33
   • Migrated all production workloads to the new cluster and verified pod scheduling, DNS resolution, PVC mounting and external integrations
   • Decommissioned the broken cluster

   Action items

   • Configure all clusters to use the GKE stable release channel
   • Implement a separate management cluster for Argo CD, monitoring and other control components (Q4 2025)
   • Review spot instance usage for critical workloads and add on-demand fallback pools
   • Document the SRE upgrade procedure: management cluster first, production after a monitoring period of several days
   • Document a Kubernetes, Istio and cert-manager compatibility matrix
   • Create an automated upgrade testing pipeline
   • Reserve static IPs for quick migrations
   • Pin versions of Istio, cert-manager, CSI and DNS addons
   • Stay current with stable releases and regularly check GKE alerts and announcements to avoid deprecation deadlines

   Lessons

   GKE upgrades the control plane at a version's deprecation deadline even when auto-upgrade is disabled, so staying inside the supported version window is how to avoid a forced upgrade. A control plane upgrade can leave existing nodes healthy while every new node fails, and spot nodes that cannot rejoin after preemption turn this into cascading failures. Relying heavily on spot instances for critical workers turned a node join failure into a progressive outage. Kubernetes upgrades have to be planned together with dependent components such as Istio and cert-manager, and without a standby cluster on the same provider there was no immediate failover; the only recovery left was building a new cluster.

   View case
3. IL-0006 VPC subnets ran out of IP addresses because the AWS VPC CNI kept IPs on full nodes, and WARM_IP_TARGET changes then blocked pod starts after every pod deletion

   Neon2025

   Symptoms

   On 16 May 2025, in Neon's Kubernetes cluster in AWS us-east-1, new compute pods were scheduled but could not start and failed with IP allocation errors. Each Neon compute is a Postgres database running in a lightweight virtual machine in its own pod, so without new pods, idle customer databases could not be woken up.

   IP address exhaustionPods Pending

   Trigger

   On 16 May the Neon control plane's periodic job that terminates idle computes started failing. Compute creations continued, and the number of active computes rose from about 5k to about 8.1k within minutes. On 19 May, a follow-up change that set WARM_IP_TARGET back to 1 started the second round of failures.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   AWS VPC CNIVPC subnet or pod address rangeCluster autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsNo capacity planningUnverified assumptionHarmful manual actionIneffective rollbackRetry storm

   Detection

   As cluster-autoscaler added nodes, the team saw IP allocation errors on new pods that were scheduled but could not start. The rate of successful pod starts and VPC subnet metrics were then used to follow the problem.

   Remediation

   • Set WARM_IP_TARGET=1 to release IPs held by nodes without free CPU or memory
   • Fixed the control plane's periodic job so idle computes were terminated again
   • Restarted the aws-node DaemonSet several times, each with a temporary improvement
   • Set WARM_IP_TARGET=0, MINIMUM_IP_TARGET=0 and WARM_ENI_TARGET=0, which let nodes allocate enough IPs and stabilised the cluster
   • On 19 May, set WARM_IP_TARGET back to 0 after setting it to 1 failed again
   • Enlarged the pool of pre-created warm compute pods to absorb failed pod starts

   Action items

   • Open a pull request to AWS CNI to improve how ipamd releases IPs in this situation
   • Follow up with AWS Support about the roughly 100 subnet IPs that were never allocated, for reasons Neon could not explain
   • Change the architecture to support horizontal scaling

   Lessons

   With default settings AWS CNI can keep many IPs on nodes that cannot use them, so the share of subnet IPs assigned to pods does not tell how close the subnet is to running out. WARM_IP_TARGET and WARM_ENI_TARGET follow different logic, a warm IP target of zero switches to the ENI logic, and IPs in cooldown count toward the target, which behaves badly under high pod churn. Changing these settings during an incident without knowing that logic prolonged the outage, and reverting a setting did not bring back the earlier healthy state.

   View case
4. IL-0233 A VPC control plane release broke IP alias routes in Nebius eu-west1, and Managed Kubernetes pods lost connectivity

   Nebius2025

   Symptoms

   On 13 March 2025 practically every pod of Nebius Managed Services for Kubernetes in the eu-west1 region lost network connectivity for at least some time between 13:36 and 18:11 UTC. Packets for the affected IP alias routes were not processed by the data plane. The eu-north1 region was not affected.

   Network unreachable

   Trigger

   A release of a VPC control plane component in eu-west1, deployed to canaries from 13:36 UTC and to all other nodes from 14:35 UTC, changed route distinguisher values for a new feature. The change made a long-standing bug in the handling of route announcements take effect for the update messages of Managed Kubernetes pods.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routing

   Contributing factor

   Ineffective rollbackGap in automated testsMonitoring blind spot

   Remediation

   • Restarted the host VPC component on the affected nodes one node at a time
   • Restarted the host VPC component on the remaining nodes in parallel once the restart was known to fix the problem

   Action items

   • Fix the bug in the VPC host component itself
   • Add an alert on a diverging number of routes
   • Add an alert on the number of drops in the data plane
   • Develop a way to reset endpoints without restarting the host VPC component
   • Move the VPC's persistent e2e test virtual machines to canary hosts
   • Add persistent e2e tests for Managed Services for Kubernetes
   • Run e2e tests more often
   • Add a deployment stage in which non-critical internal services receive updates first

   Lessons

   The failure needed both an existing IP alias at release time and a particular order of node updates, and neither the testing installation nor the canaries met both, so neither caught it. Missing alerts on technical metrics that deviate from normal, here the number of routes and the number of drops, made the response much slower.

   View case
5. IL-0230 kube-proxy sync failures during a Kubernetes upgrade corrupted node iptables, and CircleCI jobs stopped starting

   CircleCI2023

   Symptoms

   On 14 March 2023 at about 18:00 UTC, communication errors rose on one CircleCI service, and pipelines for all customers began to start late until jobs did not run at all. Within an hour the errors had spread to many services and to every function of the application, including the CircleCI UI and API.

   Service outageIntermittent connection failuresDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   At about 17:40 UTC on 14 March the infrastructure team resumed the upgrade of the main production Kubernetes cluster with a changed approach for some components, after a first attempt on 13 March had been rolled back. The ongoing upgrade left kubelet and kube-proxy at mismatched versions.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   kube-proxykubeletCoreDNSClient-side DNS resolver and cache

   Contributing factor

   Partial rolloutIneffective rollbackMonitoring blind spotHarmful manual action

   Detection

   At 18:00 UTC engineers saw communication errors rise on one service, then job processing delays climbing and job queues backing up across several services. The kube-proxy "Sync failed" errors were found only in the analysis after the incident.

   Remediation

   • Restarted every node in the cluster so each node built a fresh iptables ruleset
   • Restarted a separate pool of dependencies so jobs using contexts or the machine executor ran again
   • Added capacity to work through the backlog of jobs
   • Restarted the RabbitMQ nodes to fix a few corrupted queues

   Action items

   • Improve the Kubernetes upgrade process to limit the risk of future upgrades
   • Add metrics and alerts for kube-proxy sync errors
   • Evaluate ways to make the RabbitMQ infrastructure more resilient

   Lessons

   No single trigger caused the incident. Because networking underlies everything in the cluster, Kubernetes upgrades carry inherent risk, and CircleCI's risk mitigation did not hold up when several events interacted.

   View case

By root cause4