Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases17 cases

12 to 16 of 17

  1. Symptoms

    A colleague wrote in Slack that his application was taking a long time to deploy. A deployment that normally finishes in minutes had been running for about an hour: about half of the new pods were running and serving traffic, and the other half were Pending.

    Trigger

    The cluster reaching 256 nodes, the most its /16 pod secondary range could hold at 256 addresses per node; every further node creation failed.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A colleague reported in Slack that a deployment was slow; the pending pods' events and the cluster autoscaler status ConfigMap showed the exhausted IP space.

    Remediation
    • lowered the maximum pods per node on selected node pools, cutting IP consumption by about 30%
    • moved some node pools to larger instance types
    Action items
    • Lower the maximum pods per node on node pools that do not run many pods
    • Use larger instance types in some node pools
    Lessons

    In a VPC-native GKE cluster the number of nodes, not the number of pods, uses up the pod range: by default each node reserves 256 addresses, so even a /16 is full at 256 nodes. Maximum pods per node and node size are the practical levers; larger nodes pack better but take more pods down when they fail.

  2. Symptoms

    On May 10 the latency graphs of several services showed a few spikes of up to about one second, then latency climbed to five seconds and then to 20 seconds, and it stayed there for a long time. The same pattern appeared on many services, not just one.

    Trigger

    Several services sent a high volume of external DNS queries, all of which went through kube-dns.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Latency graphs of several services showed the rise; engineers then looked at load per kube-dns pod.

    Lessons

    By default a pod discovers DNS through the kube-dns cluster IP and uses the ClusterFirst policy, so even external lookups go through kube-dns. If a pod does not need cluster DNS, set its dnsPolicy to Default or None. Check the DNS policy early and often. iptables picks backends at random and is not a load balancer, so pods behind a cluster IP, kube-dns included, can carry very different loads.

  3. Symptoms

    Builds on Zalando's in-house Continuous Delivery Platform (CDP), which runs CI/CD on Kubernetes, timed out and failed for almost an hour on 11 June 2019. The Kubernetes builder pods could not get AWS IAM credentials.

    Trigger

    An unlucky rescaling of the CDP Kubernetes cluster left only one node available for builder pods. Builder pods were created and deleted on that node so quickly that kubelet fell behind.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Scaled the CDP cluster up by hand so builder pods spread over more than one node
    Action items
    • Raise the kubelet QPS limit from the default 5 to 50 in the global cluster configuration
  4. Symptoms

    Dex, the OIDC proxy that handled Kubernetes authentication, stored its data in the Kubernetes API (storage type kubernetes, inCluster: true) and had built up a huge number of AuthRequest objects. Listing all AuthRequests timed out, and without the list they could not be deleted.

    Trigger

    The dex namespace was deleted so that Kubernetes would clean up the accumulated AuthRequest objects itself.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The speaker says he had got hints of the problem earlier. While the masters were down, plenty of alerts arrived in Slack, but monitoring could not be reached because authentication and port-forwarding no longer worked.

    Remediation
    • removed the kubernetes finalizer from the dex namespace by calling the API directly (kill-kube-ns)
    • deployed Dex to a new namespace with sane defaults
    Lessons

    Dex with Kubernetes as its storage keeps every AuthRequest as an API object, and with a long TTL they pile up until the API cannot list them. Deleting a namespace that holds that many objects makes Kubernetes list them in a loop and can overload the masters. Monitoring that is reached through cluster authentication is lost when authentication is what broke.

  5. Symptoms

    Customers of the Zalando Fashion Store got a high rate of errors on all web product pages and outfit pages for more than an hour. The errors came from the main data aggregation layer service, which runs in one of Zalando's Kubernetes clusters.

    Trigger

    Calls from the aggregation layer to a single, not very important downstream service started timing out. The aggregation layer returned 404s for them, clients retried, and the resulting spike in requests became a spike in DNS queries to CoreDNS.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The on-call engineer for the aggregation layer phoned the on-call Kubernetes engineer. Automatic paging did not happen because the cluster's monitoring and alerting ran inside the cluster and failed along with DNS. The Kubernetes engineer then saw that the CoreDNS pods were being OOM-killed.

    Remediation
    • Raised the CoreDNS memory requests and limits by hand from 100Mi to 2000Mi
    Action items
    • Introduce a more resilient DNS setup: CoreDNS fronted by dnsmasq on every node
    • Improve high-level alerting from outside the clusters, so that a cluster problem is known before or at the same time as applications are affected
    • Improve incident response processes and tooling so that any on-call engineer can escalate directly to other teams when automatic paging fails, for example through a chat bot
    Lessons

    The Kubernetes DNS setup was far from resilient enough: a single application could take down DNS for everything in the cluster. The blast radius of one application sending more DNS queries should be limited to one node at most, ideally to single pods. Known Kubernetes DNS problems, such as Linux kernel races in conntrack handling and the ndots 5 problem, were familiar to the team and partly mitigated, but their combined effect on the DNS infrastructure was worse than the team had understood. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster was not robust enough: when the cluster's DNS broke, it could not page anyone, and recovery took longer than it should have.

Check your cluster for this

These 17 cases involve Kubernetes API server and CoreDNS. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1

Capacity exhaustion17 cases

  1. IL-0071 Worker node running out of inodes while disk space looked fine, because containerd kept a full node_modules tree in each of several image layer snapshots
  2. IL-0048 DNS lookups timed out in a large EKS cluster when CoreDNS hit the 1024 packets-per-second link-local limit, driven by sudo hostname lookups
  3. IL-0006 VPC subnets ran out of IP addresses because the AWS VPC CNI kept IPs on full nodes, and WARM_IP_TARGET changes then blocked pod starts after every pod deletion
    Neon2025
  4. IL-0170 During a Lunar New Year event, traffic more than three times normal filled the nf_conntrack table on the EKS node running the Istio ingress gateway, dropping packets and taking down Backpackr's web and app services
  5. IL-0027 All CoreDNS pods landed on one node, the node ran out of memory, and DNS for the whole service went down
  6. IL-0204 An etcd memory spike overloaded the control plane of a Render Frankfurt cluster, and DNS then failed because CoreDNS ran on the rebooted control plane nodes and could not start without the API server
    Render2024
  7. IL-0007 The AWS VPC CNI could not assign IP addresses to pods as an EKS cluster ran out of IPv4 space
  8. IL-0046 Prometheus restarted again and again because its WAL replay took longer than the startup probe allowed
  9. IL-0028 Temporal History service latency rose because its pods were CPU-throttled while CPU usage read below 60 percent
  10. IL-0195 The kube-apiservers of a cluster with more than 200 nodes ran out of memory and crashed one after another under mass LIST requests from Cilium agents
    Palark2023
  11. IL-0194 After a kube-apiserver restart, pod LIST requests from every pod of a Vector DaemonSet nearly tripled etcd memory and restarted all master nodes
    Palark2023
  12. IL-0015 A GKE cluster's /16 pod address range ran out at 256 nodes, leaving new pods Pending and node scale-ups failing
  13. IL-0033 Uneven load across kube-dns pods and a DNS packets-per-second limit pushed service latency to 20 seconds
    Airbnb2019
  14. IL-0002 CI builder pods could not get AWS IAM credentials because kubelet fell minutes behind its API rate limit
  15. IL-0076 Kubernetes masters went down after Dex filled etcd with AuthRequest objects and deleting its namespace started an endless list-and-timeout loop
  16. IL-0001 Cluster-wide DNS outage after CoreDNS pods were OOM-killed again and again under a burst of DNS queries
  17. IL-0040 Parallel Helm installs saturated small gp2 root volumes on a kops cluster and left all three workers NotReady with the kubelet or Docker down