Cases6 cases

3 to 6 of 6

1. IL-0433 Shifting API traffic from EC2 to EKS on Fargate overloaded two CoreDNS pods and caused mass name-resolution errors

   MonotaRO2023

   Symptoms

   When MonotaRO raised the share of requests for the remaining endpoints of its backend API sent to EKS from 1% to 25%, Sentry filled with errors saying the API could not reach the database and outside services. The errors were about DNS name resolution, and the traffic had to be shifted back to the EC2 version.

   DNS resolution failuresHigh error rate

   Trigger

   MonotaRO raised the share of requests for the remaining API endpoints routed by the ALB to the EKS version from 1% to 25%.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CoreDNSClient-side DNS resolver and cacheContainer CPU limitHorizontal pod autoscalerPod termination

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsNo resource requests or limitsUnrepresentative stagingUnverified assumption

   Detection

   Sentry showed a large number of errors about connecting to the database and outside services right after the traffic share was raised.

   Remediation

   • Shifted the requests back to the EC2 version to stop the errors
   • Added an HPA to autoscale the CoreDNS pods as a stopgap, which let the migration to EKS finish

   Action items

   • Set ndots to 1 through dnsConfig in the application Deployments
   • Set cache 600 in the Corefile in the coredns ConfigMap to lengthen the CoreDNS cache TTL
   • Add lameduck 30s to the CoreDNS health plugin so CoreDNS keeps serving while it is scaled in
   • Consider reducing the differences between production and staging, weighed against cost

   Lessons

   MonotaRO assumed that a managed service would not cause problems and so skipped researching other companies' migrations, load testing and monitoring. Staging differed from production in its network layout, so ndots differed between them, and staging databases could not take a high-load test. Looking at the CoreDNS logs and resolv.conf instead of guessing found that ndots:5 made lookups of outside names try every search domain first.

   View case
2. IL-0178 On EKS, HPA scale-in returned 502 errors because containers stopped before their pod IPs left the Service endpoints, and after blue/green switches conntrack kept sending established connections to deleted pods behind an instance-mode ALB

   Lotte E-commerce2022

   Symptoms

   LOTTE ON, Lotte E-commerce's online shopping mall of about 40 microservices on Amazon EKS, returned errors for a period of time whenever the Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) scaled pods in after load dropped. Requests reached containers that had already been deleted and failed with 502 errors.

   High error rateIntermittent timeoutsStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   HPA scale-in deleting pods, and the deletion of Blue pods after a blue/green switch of the Service label selector.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   Horizontal pod autoscalerPod terminationkube-proxyconntrack tableCloud load balancerIngress controller

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Remediation

   • delayed container shutdown on pod deletion (a wait in the SIGTERM handler or a preStop sleep, capped by terminationGracePeriodSeconds) so containers stop only after the pod has left the Service endpoints
   • switched some workloads' Ingress-created ALBs from instance mode to IP mode so traffic goes straight to pod IPs without iptables and conntrack

   Action items

   • Move all workloads to ALB IP mode gradually

   Lessons

   Removing a pod from Service endpoints and stopping its containers happen at the same time in Kubernetes, so a pod can stop while traffic is still routed to it unless shutdown is delayed with a preStop hook or in the application. With an instance-mode ALB, traffic passes through node iptables and conntrack, and established connections can keep going to a pod IP after its iptables rules are gone. IP mode avoids that path, within the limit of 1000 targets per target group.

   View case
3. IL-0139 Pods on GKE clusters with Calico network policy got stuck Terminating or Pending after upgrading to 1.22 or later because of a race condition in the Calico component

   Google Cloud2022

   Symptoms

   After upgrading to GKE 1.22 or later, clusters that use Calico network policy could have pods stuck in Terminating or Pending. Google Cloud posted the incident at 16:01 US/Pacific on 2022-09-15 as pods stuck terminating; from the 2022-09-21 update the description also named pods stuck Pending.

   Pods stuck in TerminatingPods Pending

   Trigger

   Upgrading a GKE cluster that uses Calico network policy to version 1.22 or later.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   CalicokubeletPod termination

   Contributing factor

   –

   Remediation

   • released a fix in GKE 1.24.4-gke.800 and made it available in 1.23 and 1.22
   • offered an internal patch through Google Cloud Support for affected customers
   • advised customers to restart the kubelet and calico-node to get stuck pods unstuck
   • advised customers without a strong need for Calico to disable Calico network policy

   Action items

   • Upgrade clusters on the Rapid, Regular and Stable release channels running 1.22 or 1.23 to the fixed version automatically

   Lessons

   A race in the Calico component can leave pods stuck Terminating, with FailedKillPod and KillPodSandbox errors that point at the network plugin, not at the workload. Restarting the kubelet and calico-node frees the stuck pods but does not remove the race; the fixed GKE version or Google's internal patch does. Clusters that use the cluster autoscaler are more likely to hit it.

   View case
4. IL-0062 Intermittent 502 errors behind a GKE Ingress because pods shut down before the load balancer stopped sending them traffic

   Ravelin2019

   Symptoms

   After Ravelin moved its API layer from VMs into its GKE cluster behind a Kubernetes Ingress, the integration tests occasionally received 502 errors.

   Intermittent connection failuresStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   Pods behind the Ingress being removed by their controller, as happens during rolling deploys and scaling.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Ingress controllerPod termination

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumption

   Detection

   Integration tests occasionally received 502 errors.

   Lessons

   Removing a pod's endpoint and signalling the pod happen at the same time, and an ingress can take a long time to catch up. A pod behind an ingress should keep serving after SIGTERM until its grace period ends, and the grace period should be longer than the load balancer's reprogramming time.

   View case

By root cause5