Cases46 cases

39 to 43 of 46

1. IL-0458 Toolforge Kubernetes API server failed to start after a restart, logging "etcd cluster is unavailable or misconfigured"

   Wikimedia Foundation2019

   Symptoms

   On 10 September 2019 the Kubernetes API server of Wikimedia's Toolforge cluster did not come back after the maintain-kubeusers process restarted it at 18:30. To monitoring and to users the whole cluster looked down: Toolforge users could not launch tools with the webservice command on the Kubernetes backend or use kubectl, and an Icinga check against the "All k8s nodes healthy" endpoint started alerting at 18:45.

   Control plane unresponsiveService outageTLS certificate errors

   Trigger

   At 18:30 the maintain-kubeusers process restarted the Kubernetes API server, which forced it to reconnect to etcd with a CA certificate that Puppet changes the night before had left mismatched with the etcd servers.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Kubernetes API serveretcdConfiguration management tool

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectHarmful manual actionNo runbook

   Detection

   Automated monitoring: an Icinga alert on the toolschecker check http://checker.tools.wmflabs.org/k8s/nodes/ready, about "All k8s nodes healthy", fired at 18:45.

   Remediation

   • Rebooted the Kubernetes master and the etcd cluster, which did not help
   • Took a backup of etcd and reduced the etcd cluster to one node to rule out raft election flaps
   • Brought etcd back to full capacity through a full disaster recovery from the backup
   • Swapped the API server's CA certificate for the one from the etcd servers, which restored services until Puppet reverted it
   • Placed the etcd Puppet CA certificate in /var/lib/puppet/client/ssl/certs/ca.pem so Puppet kept the right CA

   Action items

   • Document the etcd cluster processes
   • Upgrade Toolforge Kubernetes to improve etcd and Kubernetes error reporting and stop needing an API server restart to add a tool
   • Make kube2proxy more resilient to API server failures
   • Audit the Puppet CA certificates so the tools project has no more than one
   • Make the Kubernetes control plane highly available

   Lessons

   Components that often misbehave, such as etcd, drew the responders to the wrong fix, and working on etcd instead of the CA certificates made the outage worse. Puppet-managed certificates are risky, and very old Kubernetes versions log errors that are hard to read. The failure was hard to find because it surfaced at an API server restart rather than at the Puppet change, because the etcd cluster had long-standing undocumented quirks, and because no disaster recovery or node replacement procedure was written down for etcd.

   View case
2. IL-0008 An unresponsive OPA validating webhook crash-looped the API server during a GKE master upgrade, and node auto-repair then recreated every node

   Jetstack2019

   Symptoms

   Jetstack was upgrading the master of a development cluster that many teams use to test their apps during the working day, a regional Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster in europe-west1. The upgrade ran through Jetstack's GKE Terraform pipeline and did not finish before the 20-minute Terraform timeout, while the GKE console still showed the cluster as upgrading.

   Upgrade stallControl plane unresponsiveNode recreation loopService outage

   Trigger

   A planned master upgrade of the shared development cluster. The same upgrade had been done on another pre-production environment earlier that day, and no API downtime was expected.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Admission webhookGKE control planeKubernetes API serverkubelet

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo health probesMonitoring blind spotAutomation amplification

   Detection

   The first sign was the master upgrade missing the 20-minute Terraform timeout; re-running the pipeline returned the kube-apiserver unhealthy error. The cause was identified with the help of Google Support.

   Remediation

   • Deleted the OPA ValidatingAdmissionWebhook resource during a window of API server access

   Action items

   • Limit the OPA webhook to the namespaces where the policy applies and development teams have access
   • Enable the webhook only for Ingress and Service resources, the only resources the policy validates
   • Add a liveness probe so OPA is restarted when it stops responding, and update the OPA documentation
   • Follow the open upstream Kubernetes issue about this behaviour

   Lessons

   With alerting on API server response times, the team might have seen CREATE and UPDATE requests slow down across the board as soon as the OPA-backed webhook was first deployed. Every workload needs probes: OPA looked so simple to deploy that the team skipped the Helm chart, which adds a livenessProbe for the admission controller containers among other adjustments to the tutorial configuration. Others had hit the same problem, and an upstream issue to improve it was still open.

   View case
3. IL-0004 A new default pod priority let a new Cortex cluster preempt every production ingester in a cascade, taking Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus down

   Grafana Labs2019

   Symptoms

   On Friday 19 July 2019 the Grafana Cloud Hosted Prometheus service, which is built on the Cortex project, was down for 26 minutes. New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start.

   Pod evictionHigh error rateService outageOOMKilled

   Trigger

   An engineer created a new dedicated Cortex cluster for a large customer. Its configuration did not include the new pod priorities, so all its pods got the default medium priority, and the Kubernetes cluster did not have enough free resources to fit it.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Pod priority and preemption

   Contributing factor

   Partial rolloutAutomation amplificationMissed in reviewNo headroomRetry storm

   Detection

   New error-budget-based Prometheus alerts paged the on-call engineer within 4 minutes of the start of the outage.

   Remediation

   • Scaled up the underlying Kubernetes cluster to fit both the new and the production Cortex clusters
   • Diagnosed and fixed the out-of-memory errors in the authenticating reverse proxies in front of Cortex

   Action items

   • Give the production ingesters the high priority class, which should have been done before medium became the default
   • Have more people review changes to configuration that is global to the cluster
   • Require a design document for every configuration change outside a namespace
   • Automate the sizing of the frontend authenticating reverse proxy so it does not run out of memory under overload
   • Investigate the default backoff and scaling behaviour of Prometheus to prevent a stampeding herd of retries

   Lessons

   Medium should not have become the default priority until the production ingesters had the high priority, and that designation should have reached production sooner. The change was considered too minor for a design document and was only discussed in a GitHub issue; cluster-global configuration needs more scrutiny. On the positive side, once Cortex had enough capacity it recovered by itself, and Grafana Loki helped confirm that the ingesters exited gracefully.

   View case
4. IL-0061 A Terraform pull request merged out of order deleted a production GKE cluster, and recreating it deleted a second one

   Spotify2019

   Symptoms

   Terraform, applied from the shared cluster configuration repository after a merge, deleted Spotify's production GKE cluster in Asia. While the team tried to recreate it, Terraform deleted a second production cluster, so two of the three production clusters were gone.

   Resources deleted

   Trigger

   A feature team's pull request that added three users to an existing RBAC role binding file was merged before the cluster operators' pull request that imported the Asia cluster into Terraform state. The review build of the import pull request had already written the cluster into the shared state file, and the merged configuration had no definition of the Asia cluster, so Terraform removed it.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   TerraformCI systemGKE control plane

   Contributing factor

   No safeguard on destructive changeMissed in reviewUnverified assumption

   Detection

   Internal service discovery could not reach the deleted cluster and the cluster operator team was paged.

   Remediation

   • removed the deleted clusters from the service discovery configuration and restarted service discovery so clients fell back to the instances outside Kubernetes
   • one team that ran half on Kubernetes and half on VMs created more VMs outside Kubernetes to handle the load
   • recreated the clusters, using the hourly backups
   • updated the places where the old clusters' master IPs were hardcoded

   Action items

   • Post the Terraform dry-run output as a comment on each pull request
   • Require a status check that the branch is up to date with master, so the dry run reflects what will actually happen
   • Require an approving review on pull requests
   • Fail reviews automatically when certain keywords such as destroy appear; cluster deletions are done manually outside this repository
   • Add linters and validators for the cluster configuration
   • Schedule and announce disaster recovery tests that cover a cluster going away and smaller failures

   Lessons

   Plan for failure from the start and migrate large infrastructure gradually, so there is redundancy and a way back. A backup whose restore has never been tested is not a backup. Practising disaster recovery paid off: restoring the first deleted cluster took three and a quarter hours, and the team can now restore a larger cluster in one hour. What matters is not who made the mistake but what was learned from it.

   View case
5. IL-0066 Broken ConfigMap change lay dormant for weeks, then took down Pusher's edge proxy when a cluster upgrade replaced its pods

   Pusher2019

   Symptoms

   During a cluster upgrade, all traffic to Pusher's products stopped. The speaker recalls that requests were failing with 500 errors.

   Service outageHigh error rate

   Trigger

   A cluster upgrade replaced nodes, so the bridge pods restarted and loaded a ConfigMap that had been changed three or four weeks earlier.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   ConfigMaps and Secrets

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectUnverified assumption

   Action items

   • Build and run Wave so that changes to ConfigMaps and Secrets roll out new pods immediately

   Lessons

   A ConfigMap change does not restart the pods that use it, so for an application that cannot reload its configuration the change takes effect only when pods are next replaced, possibly weeks later during unrelated work. Tie configuration to the pod template so a bad change fails at the moment it is made.

   View case

By root cause1