Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0217 Honeycomb's main MySQL database locked up under cache-miss reads and ran out of connections, a 68-minute total outage

   Honeycomb2023

   Symptoms

   Hours after a routine switch between two clusters of Retriever, Honeycomb's storage and query engine, late on 24 July 2023, the internal SLO for Shepherd, the ingest service, began to burn slowly. The performance was only marginally slow and inconsistent, with no good explanation, so engineers treated it as minor and left it for the morning.

   High latencyDatabase overloadLock contention or deadlockService outage

   Trigger

   Late on 24 July Honeycomb switched between two Retriever clusters to avoid a subtle bug, and the new cluster stopped writing the last-written timestamps the schema cache depends on. On the morning of 25 July a feature flag flip meant to move those writes back stopped the remaining writes entirely.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   DatabaseIn-memory cache

   Contributing factor

   Dependence on a warm cacheIgnored early signalHarmful manual actionUnverified assumption

   Detection

   Hours after the cluster switch, the internal SLO for the ingest service Shepherd started burning slowly. Engineers left it for the morning, when a chart showed that Retriever's database calls updating the last-written records had stopped.

   Remediation

   • Flipped only the writes back to the other Retriever cluster with a feature flag, which did not fix the problem
   • Set up circuit breakers that denied all Shepherd traffic with a 5xx error to protect the database
   • Failed the hard-locked database over to a replica
   • Restarted all Retriever hosts so they could provide data for the cache
   • Set the last-written timestamp of every schema with traffic in the last day to now, so the schema store reloaded the cache
   • Removed the circuit breaker and restarted the query hosts that failed internal checks

   Action items

   • Finish the Retriever cluster migration and remove all code that could disable writes behind the cache
   • Explore ways to strengthen the cache further
   • Lower the contention put on the database during update storms from new schemas
   • Stabilise the performance costs of some operations in the system
   • Study instrumentation and experimentation that detect and handle such edge cases better

   Lessons

   Locally good decisions combined into the outage: the query engine wrote the timestamps because it already saw all the data, the shared cache helped scale ingest and untangle the main database, the cluster switch was done to avoid a bug, frequent deploys hid the feature flag bug, pausing deploys during the investigation kept hosts from restarting, and past near-misses made the team expect a slow failover. Feature flags, frequent deploys, pausing deploys during incidents and learning from near-misses all contributed, although they are among the practices Honeycomb trusts most. For a rare lockup of this kind a database failover is the fastest recovery. Several recent Honeycomb incidents started from trying to avoid a subtle bug.

   View case
2. IL-0215 Twilio's billing Redis master lost all balances and went read-only, and auto-recharge charged customer cards repeatedly

   Twilio2013

   Symptoms

   At 2:39 AM PDT (9:39 UTC) on 18 July 2013, services that relied on the redis-master of Twilio's billing system began to fail because the load on its host had become extreme. At 2:42 AM PDT monitoring alerted the on-call engineers to a failure in the Redis cluster.

   Database overloadData lossWrites rejected

   Trigger

   At 1:35 AM PDT on 18 July a loss of network connectivity disconnected all billing redis-slaves from the redis-master at once, and all of them requested a full synchronization at the same time. On-call engineers then restarted the overloaded redis-master.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   In-memory cacheDatabase replication

   Contributing factor

   Retry stormHarmful manual actionUnsafe failure behaviour

   Detection

   At 2:42 AM PDT monitoring alerted the on-call engineers to a failure in the Redis cluster. At 3:28 AM PDT the billing system monitoring reported the anomalous charges, and at 12:36 PM PDT monitoring detected the recurrence.

   Remediation

   • Restarted the redis-master to relieve the high load, which loaded a wrong configuration
   • Took the billing system offline to stop further credit card charges
   • Restored service to all suspended accounts
   • Restored the lost account balances from the independent double-bookkeeping record in the relational datastore
   • Took billing offline again after the recurrence and reactivated the newly suspended accounts
   • Refunded all erroneous credit card charges
   • Gave all affected accounts a credit of 10% of their last 30 days of spend
   • Replaced the original Redis cluster and corrected the redis-master configuration
   • Activated the billing system progressively for groups of customer accounts

   Action items

   • Disable Redis restarts on the redis-master and recover the master by pivoting a slave instead
   • Add fail-safes so the billing system neither suspends accounts nor charges cards when balances are missing or cannot be written
   • Validate the billing system against the double-bookkeeping databases in real time

   Lessons

   Losing the in-flight balances and the ability to write balances at the same time exposed a flaw in the auto-recharge system: it failed in a dangerous way, charging cards and suspending accounts instead of stopping.

   View case

By root cause2