Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0489 Rejoining a failed node of Magic Pages' three-node MySQL cluster broke its metadata and took customer websites down

   Magic Pages2025

   Symptoms

   On 15 January 2025, from about 09:55 to 11:36 CET, a database outage at Magic Pages took down customer websites. It began when the founder tried to reconnect a failed third node to the high-availability MySQL cluster and the database server reported ambiguous errors about missing metadata information.

   Service outage

   Trigger

   One of the three nodes of the MySQL cluster went down, and reconnecting it failed with errors about missing metadata information.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   DatabasePersistent volumes and stateful sets

   Contributing factor

   Harmful manual actionSingle point of failureMonitoring blind spot

   Remediation

   • Restarted the storage server to fix PVC provisioning
   • Let the MySQL nodes restore and sync with each other for about 45 minutes to rebuild the cluster metadata
   • Cleaned up the corrupted cluster metadata
   • Redeployed MySQL Router

   Action items

   • Monitor the health of the storage system more closely
   • Improve the failover procedures for MySQL Router
   • Investigate and fix the status page so it shows reliable information

   Lessons

   The cluster survived the first node failure as designed and lost no data, but its metadata turned out to be a single point of failure. Better monitoring of PVC health could help prevent similar issues, the 45-minute recovery leaves room for improvement, and the status page has to detect failing customer sites reliably.

   View case
2. IL-0110 A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one day

   DFDS2024

   Symptoms

   At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.

   Node NotReadyContainer crash loopOOMKilledMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Telemetry agentContainer memory limitDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo resource requests or limitsHarmful manual actionMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.

   Remediation

   • marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
   • cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
   • removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
   • scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
   • after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
   • emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix

   Action items

   • Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
   • Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
   • Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
   • Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
   • Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
   • Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
   • Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes

   Lessons

   Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.

   View case

By root cause2