Cases2 cases
1 to 2 of 2
- Symptoms
On 2025-03-12 from 10:58 UTC, alerts for high backend response times came in, and the MediaWiki deployments mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner, which serve MediaWiki for non-user-facing purposes, showed high latency and database errors. The External Storage cluster, whose hosts store the compressed text of wiki page revisions, had a sharp rise in load and connections. The same happened again on 2025-03-13 from 11:15 UTC.
- Trigger
At 10:44 UTC on 12 March a Scap deployment of the PHP 8.1 rollout for mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner was run with the flag -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False; the rollout was deployed with Scap again at 11:15 UTC on 13 March.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Alerts for high backend response times started at 10:58 UTC on 12 March, 14 minutes after the Scap deployment; 2 on-call engineers were paged. The MediaWikiMemcachedHighErrorRate alert that pointed at the cause fired only briefly because its log pipeline was overloaded.
- Remediation
- Deployed a patch to cirrus-streaming-updater that reduced SUP parallelism
- Reduced the concurrency of the categoryMembershipChange job in changeprop-jobqueue
- On 12 March, reverted 1126607 and 1126650 and re-ran Scap
- On 13 March, rolling-restarted changeprop-jobqueue
- Rolling-restarted mw-api-int
- Disabled the categorymembership job in changeprop-jobqueue
- Reverted 1127476 and 1127478
- Redeployed mw-api-int to pick up the revert
- Increased the number of mw-api-int replicas
- Redeployed mw-jobrunner to pick up the revert
- Redeployed mw-parsoid to pick up the revert
- Action items
- Reduce the number of messages sent through channel:Memcached during failures
- Add helm rollback functionality to Scap
- Decide whether Scap should update helmfile-defaults when -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False is set
- Consider removing envvars.inc from MediaWiki images
- Consider "Why" dashboards that give an overview of a group of related components together with relevant links to follow
- Coordinate incident responders better
- Be able to work with MediaWiki developers during incidents
- Lessons
The write-up puts the weight not on the technical root cause but on why the team could not see, even after the 12 March incident, that three MediaWiki deployments were running without Memcached. Alert dashboards showed what was happening, such as many busy PHP workers, but not why; dashboards linking components that affect each other, such as SQLBlobStore keys and External Storage, would have helped. The alert that pointed in the right direction did not stay firing and would probably have been lost among 78 others. The incident coordinator could not tell who was working on what or who had joined or left, the channels were noisy, the external impact was judged more critical than it was, and trace.wikimedia.org was not used although it might have helped.
IL-0110A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one dayDFDS2024- Symptoms
At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.
- Trigger
Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.
- Remediation
- marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
- cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
- removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
- scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
- after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
- emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix
- Action items
- Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
- Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
- Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
- Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
- Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
- Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
- Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes
- Lessons
Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.
These 2 cases involve Database and In-memory cache. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause2
Faulty deployment1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
Capacity exhaustion1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation