Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

1. IL-0110 A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one day

   DFDS2024

   Symptoms

   At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.

   Node NotReadyContainer crash loopOOMKilledMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Telemetry agentContainer memory limitApplication database

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo resource requests or limitsHarmful manual actionMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.

   Remediation

   • marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
   • cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
   • removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
   • scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
   • after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
   • emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix

   Action items

   • Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
   • Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
   • Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
   • Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
   • Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
   • Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
   • Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes

   Lessons

   Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.

   View case
2. IL-0172 An AWS Tokyo data centre cooling failure took down 6 of 60 CockroachDB nodes on Kubernetes within 22 minutes, and ranges lost quorum because the Helm-deployed cluster had no availability zone locality configured

   Devsisters2021

   Symptoms

   During a team dinner, a Slack alert reported that one node of the CockroachDB cluster behind Cookie Run: Kingdom had gone down. The DevOps engineers were not worried at first, because CockroachDB is built to survive the loss of some nodes.

   Node NotReadyData lossService outage

   Trigger

   A cooling system failure in an AWS Tokyo region data centre overheated the servers in one availability zone, which held CockroachDB nodes.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Application databaseHelm

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   A Slack alert reported that a database node had gone down.

   Remediation

   • copied the data outside the broken ranges into new tables with INSERT INTO ... SELECT queries that skipped the affected ranges
   • ran debug unsafe-remove-dead-replicas together with Cockroach Labs engineers, recovering one of the two lost data ranges
   • restored the last data range with the storage-layer recovery method from the previous incident

   Action items

   • Configure CockroachDB Locality so data is spread evenly across availability zones
   • Deploy with one chart and a separate values file per availability zone to set Locality
   • Replace nodes by adding Locality-configured nodes, confirming replicas in every zone, then retiring the old nodes

   Lessons

   A replication factor sized for random instance retirements does not protect against a whole availability zone failing; for a game of this scale a multi-AZ placement is required, not optional. Keeping one uniform Helm chart made zone topology hard to set, which is part of why it was left out. A repetitive chart with a values file per zone sets it reliably.

   View case
3. IL-0193 A GCP persistent disk degradation took down a Cassandra StatefulSet whose OrderedReady policy blocked recovery, and Metrictank could not reconnect to the recreated pods, causing a 23-hour Graphite query outage

   Grafana Labs2019

   Symptoms

   An alert fired because some Metrictank instances could not drain their write queue, which meant they could not write to Cassandra. Google had not yet published an incident, but a team member's Discord server, also hosted on GCP, was down, which pointed at GCP; Google confirmed an SSD persistent disk incident about 90 minutes after it began.

   High error rateNode NotReadyPods PendingService outage

   Trigger

   A Google Cloud incident in which SSD persistent disks performed so poorly that many I/O operations failed for an extended period.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Persistent volumes and stateful setsApplication databaseNode root disk

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresUnpatched known bugUnverified assumption

   Detection

   An alert that Metrictank write instances could not flush their write queue to Cassandra. Error rates alone rose too slowly to notice quickly, because most queries were served from memory.

   Remediation

   • Added compute nodes hoping new nodes could attach the disks, which did not work
   • Deleted and recreated the Cassandra StatefulSet with an updated pod management policy, so all pods but one started
   • Raised Kafka topic retention to avoid data loss during the long downtime
   • Temporarily added nodes so Metrictank restarts were not slowed by CPU starvation
   • Restarted all Metrictank instances, which took more than 20 hours, so they connected to the new Cassandra IPs

   Action items

   • Re-instantiate the gocql connection in Metrictank when it is detected dead, so it reconnects even when all Cassandra IPs change
   • Fix the Metrictank write-queue deadlock by updating an internal data structure with atomics instead of a lock

   Lessons

   An OrderedReady StatefulSet cannot recover past a single pod whose volume will not attach; when every pod is down, the ordering that protects normal start-up blocks the whole cluster. A client that learns peer addresses only from live peers needs a way to go back to the service name when all peers are replaced at once. A long-tolerated bug with a config workaround can surface at the worst time; this one turned out to have a simple fix. Writing incoming data to a Kafka write-ahead log first meant all data could still be ingested after recovery, and Kafka on non-SSD disks escaped the disk incident. With both Metrictank bugs fixed, the team expects a similar event to take less than 3 hours to recover from instead of 23.

   View case
4. IL-0064 CPU-heavy pods packed onto one Google Cloud node drove it to kernel panics, and the crash moved from node to node until the site was down

   Moonlight2019

   Symptoms

   On Friday, January 18, Moonlight's API began returning occasional errors that looked like connection problems with its Redis database. The API checks Redis on every authenticated request to validate the session. At the same time the Kubernetes monitoring reported some nodes and pods as unresponsive.

   High error rateIntermittent connection failuresNode NotReadyService outageSustained high node CPU

   Trigger

   The Kubernetes scheduler put several CPU-heavy pods on the same node, including all three replicas of the website and the server-side rendering pods.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Pod scheduling and placementLinux kernelApplication database

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureUnverified assumptionAutomation amplification

   Detection

   API errors that looked like Redis connectivity problems, and Kubernetes monitoring that showed nodes and pods as unresponsive. Google Cloud Support later found the link between sustained 100% CPU and kernel panics.

   Remediation

   • added anti-affinity rules to all major deployments so their pods spread across nodes

   Action items

   • Keep working with Google Cloud support to find and fix the cause of the node kernel panics

   Lessons

   Three replicas give no fault tolerance if the scheduler places them all on one node; anti-affinity rules make the spread explicit. A node failure that comes from the workload itself moves with the workload when the scheduler reschedules it.

   View case

By root cause2