Cases1 case
1 to 1 of 1
IL-0316Railway's control plane slowed and deployments stopped after a PgBouncer version jump used abnormal CPU and memoryRailway2025- Symptoms
At 11:48 UTC on 22 September 2025, minutes after Railway had resolved a dashboard outage, its control plane showed abnormal resource consumption and elevated API latency. A large backlog of deployments queued during the first outage had started all at once, and the control plane began returning elevated database errors.
- Trigger
After a dashboard outage caused by a schema change was fixed, a large backlog of queued deployments started at the same time and put the control plane and its database, behind a newly upgraded PgBouncer, under heavy load.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Users reported at 11:05 UTC that the project canvas failed to load; the control plane's abnormal resource consumption and elevated API latency were seen at 11:48 UTC and opened as a new incident.
- Remediation
- Deployed a fix for the API failure caused by the schema change within 15 minutes
- Suspended deployments for non-Pro users so Pro users could deploy and the queue could drain
- Suspended all deployments, Pro included, for up to 20 minutes during peak instability
- Scaled up the control plane database's CPU, memory, connection limits and IOPS
- Rolled PgBouncer back to the previous stable version, which brought all metrics back to nominal
- Re-enabled deployments for all non-Pro users
- Fixed the edge case in which private networks and their endpoints were missing from the dashboard
- Action items
- Re-engineer parts of the control plane to be more resilient, moving large parts of its storage layer away from Postgres
- Add CI validation that keeps disruptive schema changes out of production and automated schema compatibility checks before backend deployments
- Monitor and alert on PgBouncer node CPU, memory and connection pool utilization
- Upgrade PgBouncer in phases, instance by instance, instead of everywhere at once
- Lessons
Railway believes that without the breaking schema change reaching production the cascade would not have happened, that monitoring PgBouncer's own CPU, memory and pool metrics would have shown the performance regression earlier and shortened recovery, and that upgrading PgBouncer instances one at a time would have exposed the version-specific problem before it reached every instance.
This case involves Database and Database proxy and connection pooler. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause1
Breaking change in an upgrade1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation