Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0226 Azure Front Door edge servers crashed worldwide on incompatible configuration metadata, causing timeouts and DNS errors

   Microsoft Azure2025

   Symptoms

   From 15:41 UTC on 29 October 2025, customers and Microsoft services using Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN) got connection timeout errors and DNS resolution issues. Monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Intermittent timeoutsDNS resolution failuresService outageHigh latency

   Trigger

   At 15:35 UTC a specific sequence of valid customer configuration changes, made across two different AFD control plane build versions, produced incompatible customer configuration metadata that was deployed to the edge sites.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   CDN and edge networkAuthoritative DNS servers and records

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsChange with a delayed effectIneffective rollbackExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   The configuration protection system detected the data plane impact and blocked configuration changes at 15:43 UTC, and monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Remediation

   • The configuration protection system automatically blocked all new and in-flight configuration changes worldwide
   • Removed the problematic customer configurations from the latest LKG snapshot by hand
   • Blocked all customer configuration changes from propagating to the data plane
   • Deployed the updated LKG configuration across the global fleet
   • Moved Azure Portal away from Azure Front Door
   • Rebalanced traffic by hand to a few healthy edge sites, then switched back to automatic traffic management
   • Blocked all AFD customer configuration changes at the Azure Resource Manager level until safeguards were in place

   Action items

   • Fix the control plane incompatibility and the data plane bug
   • Process each customer configuration completely and synchronously before production stages
   • Add stages to the phased configuration rollout, with longer bake time between them
   • Move configuration processing on data plane servers into isolated worker processes
   • Reduce configuration propagation time from 45 minutes to about 15 minutes
   • Test backwards compatibility with configurations generated by earlier control plane builds
   • Move critical first-party infrastructure to an active-active setup with fail away
   • Isolate customer configuration and traffic with micro cell segmentation of the AFD data plane
   • Restore customer configurations within one hour by using the local configuration cache
   • Cut data plane recovery further, to about 10 minutes
   • Remove delays in Azure Service Health alerts by raising resource thresholds
   • Extend automated Azure Service Health alerts to similar classes of service degradation
   • Fail over support request systems faster so Premier and Unified customers can always open requests

   Lessons

   Microsoft describes configuration propagation risk as inherent to a global Content Delivery Network, in which route, WAF and origin changes must be deployed quickly worldwide. Both this incident and the 9 October AFD incident came from that risk. This time the incompatible metadata passed a protection system that advances only on healthy data plane signals, because the crash came later from delayed asynchronous processing. Some learnings and repair items from the earlier incident applied here as well. Microsoft advises customers to build a resilient global HTTP ingress layer that stays available during regional or network disruptions, to manage resources through the REST API or PowerShell when management portals are unavailable, and to configure Azure Service Health alerts so the right people hear about service issues.

   View case
2. IL-0250 slack.com stopped resolving on some DNSSEC-validating resolvers for about 24 hours after DNSSEC signing was turned on

   Slack2021

   Symptoms

   Soon after Slack published the DS record for slack.com at its DNS registrar on 30 September 2021, the Customer Experience team started getting user reports of "ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED" errors in Slack clients. Fewer than 1% of online users were affected, and most reports came from users of one private corporate recursive resolver and of Google Public DNS (8.8.8.8).

   DNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   On 30 September 2021 the Traffic Engineering team enabled DNSSEC signing on the slack.com zone in Amazon Route 53 and on its sub-delegated zones in NS1, and after a three-hour soak published the slack.com DS record at the DNS registrar.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Authoritative DNS servers and recordsRecursive DNS resolver serviceTerraform

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative stagingUnverified assumptionHarmful manual actionIneffective rollbackLimited debug access

   Detection

   Customer Experience received user reports of "ERR_NAME_NOT_RESOLVED" errors in Slack clients, and customers sent NetLog captures through support cases. After signing was rolled back, Slack's external DNS and DNSSEC resolution probes alerted the Traffic team.

   Remediation

   • Removed the slack.com DS record from the DNS registrar
   • Rolled back DNSSEC signing on the slack.com authoritative and delegated zones, which made resolution worse
   • Asked major ISPs and public DNS resolver operators to flush their cached slack.com records
   • Flushed the slack.com records on Google's 8.8.8.8 and Cloudflare's 1.1.1.1 through their public flush sites

   Lessons

   The DNSSEC rollout had been tested only on domains without a wildcard record, so the Route 53 wildcard NSEC bug first appeared on slack.com; Slack names not testing a wildcard domain first as an oversight. Removing the DS record at the registrar does not stop validation at once, because resolvers cache the DS record from the .com zone for up to 24 hours, and removing the DNSKEY while that record is still cached makes every validating resolver fail. Managing DNS through Terraform hid the console warning about disabling DNSSEC. Re-enabling signing would neither have helped nor hurt, because Route 53 generates a new ZSK each time signing is enabled.

   View case

By root cause1