Incident Library
  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    On a Sunday, a team using one of Skyscanner's Kubernetes clusters manually paged the out-of-hours Kubernetes support because their service showed elevated latency, worst at the p90 and maximum levels.

    Trigger

    Upgrading the HAProxy ingress controller to v0.6 and going back from Service virtual IPs to individual pod IPs as backends, on the understanding that the sort-backends flag introduced in v0.5, false by default, meant backends were randomly shuffled.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A cluster user manually paged the out-of-hours Kubernetes support about elevated latency; Prometheus queries then showed the uneven request distribution across pods.

    Remediation
    • switched the affected service from pod IPs back to the Service virtual IP through a config change in the internal deployment tool Slingshot
    • patched the controller to keep each backend's servers in an insertion-ordered slice and changed the template to iterate over that slice
    • tested the patch in sandbox clusters and rolled it out to the production clusters
    Action items
    • Run the internal controller patch in production and return to pod IPs as the default backends
    • Raise the problem upstream with a GitHub issue and pull request
    • Test changes to cluster components against the specific behaviour and conditions that matter
    Lessons

    The team already knew that sorted backends cause hot-podding and still did not test the new flag well enough to see that it did not work; changes to cluster components need tests aimed at the exact behaviour that matters, under conditions like production. A keyword can behave differently in different parts of a language: range over a map is unordered in Go code but sorted in text/template. A small cluster component can do outsized harm to every user of the cluster and, in the end, to customers.

  2. Symptoms

    Customers were affected, and Zalando's IAM service answered requests with HTTP 404. The talk shows this on slides titled "Customer impact" and "IAM returning 404", followed by a slide on the number of pods in the cluster.

    Trigger

    A CronJob (apiVersion batch/v2alpha1, schedule "*/15 9-19 * * Mon-Fri") whose concurrencyPolicy: Forbid and job history limits sat inside the pod template spec instead of the CronJob spec. The talk shows it right after the slides on the number of pods and the API server being OOM-killed, and the lessons add a quota on the number of pods.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • fixed the CronJob manifest: moved concurrencyPolicy: Forbid and the job history limits to the CronJob spec, added activeDeadlineSeconds: 120 and changed the schedule to "7 8-18 * * Mon-Fri"
    Action items
    • Make the ingress stay healthy during API server problems
    • Make the ingress keep the last known set of routes
    • Use a ResourceQuota on the number of pods (the example sets pods: "1500")
    Lessons

    An AWS ALB routes traffic to all hosts when all hosts report unhealthy, so the ingress should stay healthy during API server problems. An ingress controller that reads routes from the API server should keep its last known set of routes. Use a quota for the number of pods.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Ingress controller and Configuration templating. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2