Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0059 Single-master Kubernetes control plane kept dying because the kubelet restarted a healthy etcd on a failing kubeadm liveness probe

   NRE Labs2018

   Symptoms

   The daily NRE Labs statistics showed lesson activity collapsing, and kubectl could not reach the cluster: `The connection to the server 1.2.3.4:6443 was refused - did you specify the right host or port?`

   Control plane unresponsiveProbe failuresService outage

   Trigger

   Unknown. The liveness probe that kubeadm writes into the etcd static pod manifest (an `etcdctl get foo` against 127.0.0.1:2379, failureThreshold 8, timeoutSeconds 15) started failing. The author first suspected GCP maintenance the night before, but could not reproduce the probe failure by hand and does not know why it began.

   Root cause

   unknown

   Component

   etcdkubeletKubernetes API server

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureUnreviewed defaultsHarmful manual actionIgnored early signalMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The author saw lesson activity drop in the daily NRE Labs statistics during his morning routine.

   Remediation

   • removed the liveness probe section from the kubeadm-generated etcd static pod manifest and applied it between etcd restarts

   Action items

   • Add monitoring, especially for the single-node master
   • Run a basic "down for maintenance" page in Google Cloud Functions that points to Twitter for updates, to redirect to during outages

   Lessons

   Because all of the infrastructure is managed as code, the cluster could be rebuilt quickly, but destroying it before finding the cause also destroyed the evidence. Monitoring matters, especially with a single-node master. Read the restart counts in kubectl output, not just the Running status. Remember the fundamentals instead of expecting the issue to be more complicated than it is, and do not let the urgency of an outage push you into hasty decisions. Put up a maintenance page instead of leaving the site failing halfway.

   View case
2. IL-0072 High etcd write latency made the API servers return stale data, and the production cluster flipped between two views of its state

   Nordstrom2017

   Symptoms

   A user reported that pods were starting up and then vanishing. When the cluster operators looked, kubectl get pods and kubectl get nodes returned two different sets of data that alternated back and forth, as if there were two opinions of the cluster's state.

   Stale or inconsistent API readsStale endpoint routingService outage

   Trigger

   etcd write latency rose far above the healthy single-digit milliseconds; the speakers say trouble starts once the database sync time crosses double digits or several hundred milliseconds.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   etcdKubernetes API serverIngress controllerPersistent volumes and stateful sets

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   A user reported pods starting up and vanishing.

   Remediation

   • restored service on a replacement cluster
   • freed persistent volumes from the old cluster one by one so they could bind in the new cluster
   • updated DNS records that pointed at the old cluster's load balancer names

   Action items

   • Make the Kubernetes API server request quorum reads from etcd

   Lessons

   etcd is extremely sensitive to write latency; once the database sync time crosses double digits of milliseconds, stale reads or badly degraded performance follow. Without quorum reads, a consistent store can still hand out stale data. Documentation for a fast-moving system changes, so read it again regularly. Moving workloads to a new cluster is hard when they hold persistent volumes or when DNS records point at generated load balancer names.

   View case

By root cause2