Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0110 A Grafana Agent pod's high memory use and crash-looping Hangfire pods drove a Kubernetes node into system OOM and NotReady, twice in one day

   DFDS2024

   Symptoms

   At 10:01 UTC on 2024-03-13 a Kubernetes node entered NotReady state, with CPU requests at 78% and memory requests at 82%. An alert fired in Slack at 10:03 and was picked up at 10:05. An attempt to SSH into the node at 10:13 failed because it was unresponsive; it started responding again at 10:19.

   Node NotReadyContainer crash loopOOMKilledMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Pods of a dev container that used Hangfire to trigger jobs failed with OOM and crash-looped on a node where a Grafana Agent pod was already using a lot of memory.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Telemetry agentContainer memory limitDatabase

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo resource requests or limitsHarmful manual actionMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   A Slack alert fired two minutes after the node went NotReady and was picked up two minutes later; the second node's NotReady at 15:03 also raised a Slack alert.

   Remediation

   • marked the EC2 instance unhealthy so a new node started
   • cordoned and force-drained the NotReady node and terminated its EC2 instance
   • removed the new LimitRange from the Grafana Agent namespace and restarted the Grafana Agent pod
   • scaled the dev container to 0 replicas, after which EC2 network traffic returned to normal
   • after the second NotReady, scaled the dev container to 0 replicas again and added a new node
   • emailed the team that owns the dev container, which confirmed it was working on a fix

   Action items

   • Move grafana-agent to the monitoring node group
   • Add alerts for when bandwidth across the cluster reaches a certain threshold
   • Investigate whether memory limits can be set on the grafana-agent Helm chart
   • Investigate grafana-agent memory usage
   • Ask Grafana support whether grafana-agent should use a PVC
   • Consider pushing node logs to Loki with limited retention
   • Create a wiki page with common metrics and log queries to check when investigating issues with Kubernetes nodes

   Lessons

   Dev workloads mixed with production let one crash-looping dev container take down nodes that production also used, and a monitoring agent outside its dedicated node group added to the memory pressure. Scaling the suspect container back up before its owners had fixed it brought the failure back on the replacement node. The team also noted that action items from earlier post-mortems need follow-up, and that knowledge of useful CloudWatch metrics had not been shared, which made the diagnosis harder.

   View case
2. IL-0503 mybinder.org launches failed after a GKE node ran out of memory and its nginx-ingress proxy pod crash-looped

   Binder Project2017

   Symptoms

   On 30 November 2017 at 16:59 PST, mybinder.org operators noticed that Grafana looked wrong and that launching a new server failed with an error that a temporary user could not be created. Pods that were already running kept running, but no new ones were being created.

   Service outageContainer crash loopProbe failuresOOMKilled

   Trigger

   A build container, which ran without a memory limit, most likely used up all the memory on the node that ran the proxy pod.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Ingress controllerContainer memory limitJupyterHub

   Contributing factor

   No resource requests or limitsHarmful manual actionNo alert on limit

   Detection

   An operator happened to look at Grafana at 16:59 PST, saw that it looked wrong, and confirmed the error by launching a new server.

   Remediation

   • Cordoned the node that had run out of memory
   • Uncordoned the node once the proxy was working

   Action items

   • Limit the memory available to build pods
   • Change the JupyterHub configuration so user pods are not cleaned up when the jupyterhub pod restarts
   • Nominate one person to drive the response, possibly in a shared terminal, so only one person changes the cluster
   • Alert when something is wrong with the cluster, for example by counting 4xx responses on the jupyterhub pod

   View case

By root cause1