Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

1. IL-0071 Worker node running out of inodes while disk space looked fine, because containerd kept a full node_modules tree in each of several image layer snapshots

   Onkar Raghunath Shelke2026

   Symptoms

   A Kubernetes worker node paged with NodeFilesystemFilesFillingUp, the node_exporter mixin alert that predicts a filesystem will run out of inodes. The engineer checked disk space first: df -h showed the root filesystem 83% used, 103G used and 22G available. df -i showed inodes 67% used, 11M used and 5.3M free.

   Node disk full

   Trigger

   Several versions of a single-stage Node.js image, each shipping more than 40,000 files, were held on the node; containerd unpacked every layer with a distinct digest into its own snapshot, each with a full copy of node_modules.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Node root diskkubeletContainer runtime

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsMonitoring blind spotUnknown limit

   Detection

   The NodeFilesystemFilesFillingUp alert from the node_exporter mixin fired on the predicted inode trend while inode use was at 67%.

   Action items

   • Build the image in multiple stages so the final image contains only the compiled assets
   • Add a flat alert on root filesystem inode use above 80% for 30 minutes alongside the predictive alert
   • Put a Prometheus query on a dashboard that shows, per node, inode usage minus disk usage, sorted from the highest
   • Remove unused images from nodes with crictl rmi --prune to free old snapshots

   Lessons

   kubelet's background cleanup works on bytes only. A workload heavy in small files gets no early intervention for inodes, and the first thing kubelet does at 5% free inodes is evict pods. Watch inode use on nodes separately from disk use, and keep dependency trees out of runtime images.

   View case
2. IL-0591 Gitpod workspaces in all regions became IO bound and unresponsive for days after the ws39 workspace cluster release

   Gitpod2022

   Symptoms

   From April 11, 2022 at 13:17 UTC customers and Gitpod staff reported that Gitpod workspaces were intermittently becoming unresponsive. CPU usage of nodes and pods looked normal, with nothing maxed out, and at 13:58 UTC the team found that the workspaces were IO bound rather than CPU bound.

   Throughput degradationSustained high node CPUNode NotReadyData loss

   Trigger

   The ws39 generation of workspace clusters, released to all regional clusters on April 8th at 20:08 UTC and to the XL clusters on April 9th at 17:45 UTC, split the 1TB disk into smaller RAID0 disks, changed CPU limiting and workspace networking, and moved to faster machine types.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Node root diskContainer CPU limit

   Contributing factor

   No staged rolloutGap in automated testsUnrepresentative stagingUnknown limitOverlapping failuresIneffective rollbackHarmful manual actionLimited debug access

   Detection

   Customers and Gitpod staff reported on April 11th at 13:17 UTC that workspaces were intermittently unresponsive, and the team opened an incident in Slack through its incident.io integration. On April 17th the team noticed increased CPU load on the workspace nodes and opened an internal incident.

   Remediation

   • Shifted workspace starts back to the ws38 clusters on April 11th
   • Built ws39a clusters with c2d machines and local SSDs and moved traffic to them
   • Requested a limit increase from Let's Encrypt
   • Routed EU XL traffic to the regional EU cluster and built ws-eu39bxl to replace the crashed ws-eu39xl
   • Cleaned up workspaces stuck in a stopping state so users could start them again
   • Released ws40 with 1TB boot disks to get more IO bandwidth
   • Removed the workspaces that consumed excessive CPU time for crypto-mining
   • Blocked the fraudulent users behind the crypto-mining from using Gitpod
   • Rolled back the ws-daemon change that broke CPU limiting and shipped the fix in the ws34 clusters
   • Blocked ACME HTTP requests to workspace ports so Let's Encrypt rate limits would not be hit again
   • Rolled out IO limiting with the ws41xl and ws41 clusters and moved traffic to them step by step

   Action items

   • Invest in test automation so that test results stop releases like this one
   • Vary the interval between traffic shifts to new clusters, with more time for larger releases
   • Add a risk assessment stage, to be automated, that governs changeset size and rollout speed of workspace cluster rollouts
   • Reduce the impact teams have on each other
   • Add review criteria that find backwards incompatible changes before pull requests are merged, and split such pull requests
   • Recommend rollback as the primary means of mitigation in the incident procedures, and look at automating it
   • Make the status page show the workspace service as down when it is, and update the playbooks
   • Keep incident communication in a single Slack channel and Google Meet
   • Put 10% of the engineering staff on the on-call rotation from May 9th and use that time on observability, alerting and stability

   Lessons

   Gitpod concluded that it should have committed to rolling back on April 11th instead of building and shipping fixes, which kept customers on degraded workspaces longer than necessary. A large release so soon after the previous one needed a risk assessment and slower traffic shifts, and backwards incompatible changes that block a rollback need to be found before pull requests are merged. Failure-free operations require experience with failure.

   View case

By root cause2