Cases5 cases
1 to 5 of 5
IL-0147AKS nodes behind an HTTP proxy failed to provision with CSE exit code 31 on 202508 node images, because a refactoring stopped the proxy from being used when downloading uncached Kubernetes binariesMicrosoft2025- Symptoms
Creating or scaling a node pool on AKS 1.31.8 failed: the VMSS instances never finished provisioning. This started after planned maintenance moved the node image from 202507.* to 202508.*, in a cluster where nodes must send all outbound traffic through an internal HTTP/HTTPS proxy and direct egress is blocked. It happened with both Ubuntu and AzureLinux images.
- Trigger
A node image auto-upgrade from 202507.* to 202508.* during planned maintenance, on clusters whose Kubernetes patch version was not pre-cached in the new image.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The customer saw VMSS instance provisioning fail with a vmssCSE error in the VMSS activity logs and reported it as a GitHub issue.
- Remediation
- The customer pinned the node image to a 202507.* snapshot on clusters running 1.31.8
- The customer upgraded clusters to AKS 1.31.9 or 1.31.10, whose binaries are cached in the 202508.* images
- The AKS team hot-patched VHD 20250811 so the proxy configuration is used for uncached binary downloads and made it globally available in public regions on 2025-09-04; it also announced the hotfix for VHD 20250820
- The AKS team told users to reimage their nodes with az aks nodepool upgrade --node-image-only to pick up the hotfixed image
- Action items
- Apply the proxy fix in all future VHDs
- Lessons
A bootstrap path that runs only when an artefact is missing from a cache is easy to break without noticing: here only clusters on Kubernetes versions not pre-cached in the node image ever downloaded binaries, so only they met the proxy regression. Testing node provisioning behind a mandatory egress proxy, on older patch versions as well as the newest, would exercise that path. For clusters with restricted egress, pinning the node image or moving to a Kubernetes version cached in the image were both quick workarounds while the fix was shipped.
- Symptoms
At 09:36 on 18 March 2025, during the upgrade of the live cluster to EKS 1.30, users reported that their pods were being terminated and were not restarting automatically, in both production and non-production environments. Automated infrastructure alerts fired as well, and production services had outages.
- Trigger
Upgrading the live EKS cluster from 1.29 to 1.30, during which the descheduler attempted to reschedule all pods on the cordoned nodes simultaneously.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Users reported at 09:36 that pods were being terminated and not restarting, and automated infrastructure alerts fired.
- Remediation
- Removed the cordon annotation so pods could be rescheduled
- Deleted stuck 1.30 nodes to force their recreation
- Added a new node group of 20 nodes running 1.30 by hand
- Cordoned and drained all old 1.29 nodes onto the new 1.30 nodes
- Action items
- Raise an AWS Production System Down support case (Case ID: 174229643100496)
- Get guidance from AWS support on querying control-plane logs to find the root cause of similar issues
- Document a runbook for emergency scaling of a new node group in case of unexpected capacity shortages
- Alert on an imbalance between the autoscaling group and the Kubernetes nodes
- Review the descheduler configuration to understand why it throws pods off cordoned nodes, and fix it where possible
- Alert on spikes in the pending pod count
- Lessons
The write-up lists review actions rather than lessons. They show the team had no documented way to add an emergency node group, no alert on a mismatch between the autoscaling group and the nodes Kubernetes sees, no alert on a spike in pending pods, and no clear understanding of how the descheduler treats cordoned nodes.
IL-0164An incremental Linode Kubernetes Engine production update that was missing changes from the previous release made cluster upgrades and node additions fail silentlyLinode2022- Symptoms
From about 18:30 UTC on June 15, 2022, customers of the Linode Kubernetes Engine (LKE) who tried to upgrade a cluster or add nodes saw those operations fail silently, without an error. The status page opened an investigation of an LKE issue at 19:54 UTC, and the affected list covered LKE in eleven regions.
- Trigger
An incremental update pushed to the LKE production environment at about 18:30 UTC.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- –
- Detection
The status page began investigating at 19:54 UTC, 1 hour 24 minutes after the update.
- Remediation
- Released a follow-up LKE update at about 21:00 UTC that contained the missing changes
- Action items
- Add steps and automation to the update process
IL-0149Upgrades of AKS clusters on Virtual Machine Scale Sets failed with a 'platform image is not available' error after a service update left a backend service unhealthyMicrosoft Azure2019- Symptoms
From 07:20 UTC on 28 September 2019, customers running Azure Kubernetes Service clusters on Virtual Machine Scale Sets (VMSS) got failures when they tried any cluster upgrade. The error read: "The platform image 'microsoft-aks:aks:aks-ubuntu-1604-201909:2019.08.21' is not available. Verify that all fields in the storage profile are correct." The issue title calls the error PlatformImageNotFound.
- Trigger
A recent service update affected instances of a backend service, which became unhealthy and stopped requests from completing.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- –
- Detection
Customers received failure messages when they tried to upgrade their clusters.
- Remediation
- published az vmss update commands that set the scale set's image version to 2019.09.25 and SKU to aks-ubuntu-1604-201909, after which the upgrade could be run again
- mitigated affected clusters by hand (AKS and VMSS teams)
- rolled out hot fixes to all regions, completed by 15 October 2019
IL-0014A GKE upgrade to a withdrawn version stalled on slow drains and a stuck node pool, then broke an ingress and confused the HPAloveholidays2019- Symptoms
On the evening of a long-overdue upgrade of a loveholidays production GKE cluster from 1.10.X to 1.12.5-gke.10, planned to take 2 to 2.5 hours, the master upgrade and the first two 7-node NodePools went smoothly. After that the NodePool upgrades slowed to a crawl. Each node is cordoned, drained and upgraded in turn. Even a 14-node cluster at about 5 minutes per node took over an hour, and with about 100 more nodes to go, some of them taking over 15 minutes to drain, the sequential drains were too slow to finish at a reasonable hour.
- Trigger
A manual upgrade of the GKE masters and NodePools from 1.10.X to 1.12.5-gke.10, two versions at once, on 19 March 2019; GKE's release notes of 14 March had already said that version was no longer available for new clusters or master upgrades because masters showed elevated error rates, but it could still be selected.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The slow drains, zombie nodes and stuck NodePool were seen by the engineer running the upgrade; the broken Ingress was noticed after the upgrade and explained by Google support; the HPA problem was noticed the next day.
- Remediation
- drained the remaining NodePool nodes ahead of the upgrade with kubectl drain --ignore-daemonsets --delete-local-data
- deleted the zombie instances from the managed instance group with gcloud compute instance-groups managed delete-instances
- cancelled the stuck UPGRADE_NODES operation with gcloud beta container operations cancel
- used kubectl port-forward in place of the broken internal Ingresses
- scaled down the older of two active ReplicaSets, or triggered a dummy deployment, to bring the HPA back
- Action items
- Alert when a HorizontalPodAutoscaler is at 70% and at 100% of its capacity
- Alert when a deployment has had two active ReplicaSets for 30 minutes and for 60 minutes
- Re-evaluate termination grace periods that were set to arbitrary large values
- Read the GKE release notes before every cluster upgrade
- Use auto-upgrade in non-production environments, and manual cluster upgrades with automatic node upgrades in production
- Keep environments as identical as possible, including resource names
- Lessons
Read the release notes before upgrading: the target version had been withdrawn five days earlier. Drain time depends on pod configuration, so emptyDir volumes, long grace periods and missing disruption budgets turn a NodePool upgrade into hours. Pre-production only catches problems like the ingress bug if it matches production down to resource names. Auto-upgrades in non-production surface problems early, and a mix of manual cluster upgrades and automatic node upgrades in production keeps clusters current without much effort.
These 5 cases involve Node pool and Cluster autoscaler. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause3
Software defect1 case
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
Faulty deployment3 cases
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
IL-0020During an EKS 1.30 upgrade the descheduler tried to reschedule every pod on the cordoned nodes at once and production workloads went downIL-0164An incremental Linode Kubernetes Engine production update that was missing changes from the previous release made cluster upgrades and node additions fail silentlyLinode2022IL-0149Upgrades of AKS clusters on Virtual Machine Scale Sets failed with a 'platform image is not available' error after a service update left a backend service unhealthyMicrosoft Azure2019
Cloud provider outage1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation