Cases6 cases

1 to 5 of 6

1. IL-0471 GitHub Actions runs failed or sat queued for 9 hours after a routine deployment's pod replacement saturated capacity

   GitHub2026

   Symptoms

   From 15:05 UTC on 6 August 2026 GitHub Actions workflow runs failed to start, failed partway through or stayed queued for a long time, on both GitHub-hosted and self-hosted runners. Some requests to the Actions REST API returned errors, and some customers saw unexpected rate limiting in their workflows.

   High error rateHigh latency

   Trigger

   A routine deployment to an internal Actions service that processes events and generates Actions jobs replaced pods, and the remaining capacity became saturated.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CI system

   Contributing factor

   No headroomExcessive blast radiusHarmful manual action

   Remediation

   • Expanded capacity of the affected services
   • Throttled incoming webhook-triggered work
   • Increased processing capacity for the backlog of affected events
   • Deployed changes that stopped runners from repeatedly trying to acquire invalid jobs
   • Deployed a fix for self-hosted runners that were not picking up jobs and enabled it incrementally
   • Paused migrations with GitHub Enterprise Importer
   • Restored webhook-triggered Actions workflows to full throughput
   • Rolled back the mitigation that left some ARC runners offline, and recovered those runners by hand
   • Shared CLI and UI steps for customers to clear jobs that could not be retried or canceled

   Action items

   • Improve deployment and capacity safeguards for the affected services
   • Strengthen monitoring for the conditions that preceded the incident
   • Improve the resiliency and recovery of queued work and runner assignment
   • Add automatic recovery for self-hosted runners in upcoming Runner and ARC releases
   • Reduce the risk of cascading failures and speed up recovery during large Actions disruptions

   View case
2. IL-0465 IONOS Container Registry image pushes and pulls failed with 504 Gateway Timeout

   IONOS Cloud2026

   Symptoms

   On 4 March 2026 customers of the IONOS Container Registry got 504 Gateway Timeout errors when pushing or pulling container images, and deployments that relied on the registry were blocked. The status page first reported an increased error count on the registry at 09:23 UTC, saying customers might be unable to pull images.

   Image pull failuresHigh error rate

   Trigger

   A migration combined with a temporary capacity constraint placed two critical control plane components on the same proxy instance, despite anti-affinity rules; the shared proxy then reached its concurrent connection limit.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Container registry and its credentialsManaged Kubernetes control plane and provider APIPod scheduling and placement

   Contributing factor

   No headroomSingle point of failureNo alert on limit

   Remediation

   • Rolled back a component of the Kubernetes control plane to an earlier version
   • Provisioned additional proxy capacity
   • Moved the affected control plane components onto separate proxy instances

   Action items

   • Redesign registry-to-API connectivity so each node uses its own local proxy
   • Adjust alert thresholds to warn before proxy connection use approaches capacity
   • Deploy more infrastructure clusters and redistribute registries so no cluster exceeds safe capacity, with automation that keeps balancing load

   View case
3. IL-0542 Twingate authentication and authorization requests failed at higher rates after traffic moved onto a smaller GKE cluster

   Twingate2025

   Symptoms

   On 21 March 2025, between 21:10 and 21:41 UTC, part of the authentication and authorization requests to Twingate services failed with elevated error rates.

   High error rate

   Trigger

   Twingate saw anomalies in one of its GKE clusters and scaled down the deployments in that cluster to protect the rest of the system, which moved its traffic to the other clusters.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Cloud load balancerGKE control planeHorizontal pod autoscalerCluster autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Retry stormNo headroomOverlapping failuresHarmful manual action

   Detection

   Twingate observed anomalies in one of its GKE clusters at the start of the incident.

   Remediation

   • Reintroduced capacity in the cluster that had been scaled down, so traffic was rebalanced across regions

   Action items

   • Keep working with the cloud provider to find the cause of the unexpected timeouts and of the cluster update's impact
   • Run deployments in all regions with the same number of replicas in the HPA configuration
   • Raise the maximum node counts of the cluster node autoscalers to leave more room to scale up
   • Configure the HPA to scale up faster

   View case
4. IL-0495 HubSpot's internal load balancers on Kubernetes were falsely marked unhealthy and the rest collapsed under the traffic

   HubSpot2024

   Symptoms

   Between 14:20 and 15:16 UTC on 27 August 2024, some HubSpot customers could not log in to their accounts, reach their content or use HubSpot tools. Requests were slow or failed because HubSpot's internal load balancers, which run on Kubernetes and spread traffic across the backend services, were overloaded.

   Probe failuresHigh latencyHigh error rate

   Trigger

   Routine operation of a critical component of HubSpot's traffic management system, from about 14:08 UTC, ran path handling updates in the load balancer stack, and an issue in that stack made those updates block health check responses.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Ingress controllerLiveness and readiness probes

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationNo headroom

   Detection

   Monitoring detected widespread performance degradation across the platform at 14:23 UTC and the incident response team was mobilised. HubSpot says it had identified the issue internally by 14:20 UTC. The status page was not updated until 14:44 UTC, which left customers with outdated information.

   Remediation

   • Tried to increase the capacity of the remaining load balancer instances
   • Brought new load balancer instances online, which relieved the pressure and let traffic return to normal

   Action items

   • Change the health check configuration so health checks do not time out falsely
   • Redesign the health check system so health checks get priority and keep running during operations such as configuration updates
   • Increase the capacity of the load balancers for sudden traffic spikes
   • Change the load balancing architecture to detect traffic surges earlier and distribute load dynamically in real time
   • Update the status page automatically for large-scale outages
   • Integrate the monitoring systems more tightly with the communication tools
   • Expand load testing to simulate high-traffic scenarios
   • Introduce chaos engineering to test platform resilience regularly
   • Add traffic pattern metrics, including the ratio of current connections to the maximum allowed
   • Add auto-scaling that adjusts resource capacity to traffic patterns

   Lessons

   HubSpot concluded that earlier detection of the abnormal traffic surge could have prevented the cascading failure, and that health checks have to keep running during operations such as configuration updates so that working load balancers are not removed together. The late status page update caused confusion for customers.

   View case
5. IL-0115 One of OpenAI's three production AKS clusters went offline through a human error, and rebuilding it took 10½ hours because an AKS Kubernetes upgrade broke the ingress and AKS cannot be downgraded

   OpenAI2022

   Symptoms

   At 18:56 PDT on 23 June 2022 (01:56 UTC on 24 June) several models went offline at once: some fine-tuned curie and davinci models, the Codex beta models code-davinci-001 and code-cushman-001, the legacy GPT models curie, babbage and ada, and all Embeddings models.

   Service outageHigh error rateIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   A destructive operation on one of the three production clusters, caused by human error that the existing safeguards did not catch, took the whole cluster offline.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Ingress controllerModel hub

   Contributing factor

   No safeguard on destructive changeNo headroomDeferred upgradesOverlapping failures

   Remediation

   • re-allocated the models from the lost cluster to the remaining two clusters
   • rebuilt the VPN link with Azure support after losing the connection to AKS during cluster setup
   • built workarounds with Azure support after losing the connection to Azure Private Link
   • tore down the cluster and rebuilt it from scratch after the upgraded Kubernetes version broke the ingress
   • moved traffic back into the rebuilt cluster between 05:30 and 06:30 PDT

   Action items

   • Add checks and locks so that this and similar production-critical infrastructure cannot be modified by accident
   • Add better visibility into the operations being performed and make parts of the system more lexicographically distinct
   • Keep working with Azure on the AKS network connectivity issues so they do not disrupt new cluster operations
   • Update playbooks with the new cluster failure modes and change the setup steps for new clusters and infrastructure
   • Upgrade Kubernetes systematically and set aside time so the clusters do not fall behind again
   • Shard fine-tuned models across multiple clusters and work towards more automatic cross-cluster replication
   • Distribute and replicate Azure Blob Storage so fine-tuned models load faster and more reliably
   • Finish rolling out node-to-node caching to relieve Azure Blob Storage bottlenecks
   • Change how model weights are stored so they are more efficient and faster to load

   Lessons

   Losing one of three clusters exhausted the GPU headroom, and GPUs could not be added on short notice, so full recovery depended on bringing the same cluster back. Rebuilding it exposed a deferred Kubernetes upgrade: the newer version broke the ingress, and because AKS cannot downgrade there was no way back except a full rebuild. Recovering many large models at once is limited by the bandwidth of the storage they load from, and the caches that normally hide this do not help when everything moves to a different cluster.

   View case

By root cause5