Cases3 cases
1 to 3 of 3
IL-0063VPN outage after recreating a Redis StatefulSet restarted the whole Redis cluster without readiness checksAdGuard VPN2025- Symptoms
The day began with an alert that several instances of the Redis cluster were running out of disk space. That part was fixed quickly. The outage came an hour later: right after the Redis StatefulSet was deleted and recreated at 8:10 UTC, Kubernetes restarted every Redis pod within about five minutes, and problems started to appear.
- Trigger
To make Git match the volumes that had been resized by hand, the Redis StatefulSet was deleted with orphan (non-cascading) deletion and recreated with the new storage template; Kubernetes reconciled the new spec by restarting the entire Redis cluster.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
An alert about Redis instances running out of disk space started the work; the outage itself showed up as backend errors about Redis connections right after the StatefulSet was recreated.
- Remediation
- made the Redis masters forget obsolete node identities, reset the affected replicas and rejoined them, then waited for replication to catch up
- identified the component that was actually running out of memory, scaled the backend service and raised memory limits for that component
- temporarily relaxed probes so backend instances took traffic immediately instead of flapping between ready and not ready
- reverted the temporary workarounds at 10:00 UTC
- Action items
- Add startup probes so a Redis pod is not marked ready until its dataset is loaded
- Build an own control plane for Redis that handles restarted pods stuck to an old master address
- Reduce dependence on the single Redis cluster: move some important data to other stores, such as a separate Redis cluster per server, and use Kafka for some backend components
- Lessons
The disk resize was not the problem; the cleanup afterwards was. An immutable field pushes operators toward deleting and recreating the controller, and that can set off a full reconcile. Startup and readiness probes are what slow a rolling restart down to a safe pace; without them a distributed store restarts in the most fragile way. Recovery plans must expect a cluster to heal slowly, and dependent services need to degrade gracefully while it does.
IL-0495HubSpot's internal load balancers on Kubernetes were falsely marked unhealthy and the rest collapsed under the trafficHubSpot2024- Symptoms
Between 14:20 and 15:16 UTC on 27 August 2024, some HubSpot customers could not log in to their accounts, reach their content or use HubSpot tools. Requests were slow or failed because HubSpot's internal load balancers, which run on Kubernetes and spread traffic across the backend services, were overloaded.
- Trigger
Routine operation of a critical component of HubSpot's traffic management system, from about 14:08 UTC, ran path handling updates in the load balancer stack, and an issue in that stack made those updates block health check responses.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Monitoring detected widespread performance degradation across the platform at 14:23 UTC and the incident response team was mobilised. HubSpot says it had identified the issue internally by 14:20 UTC. The status page was not updated until 14:44 UTC, which left customers with outdated information.
- Remediation
- Tried to increase the capacity of the remaining load balancer instances
- Brought new load balancer instances online, which relieved the pressure and let traffic return to normal
- Action items
- Change the health check configuration so health checks do not time out falsely
- Redesign the health check system so health checks get priority and keep running during operations such as configuration updates
- Increase the capacity of the load balancers for sudden traffic spikes
- Change the load balancing architecture to detect traffic surges earlier and distribute load dynamically in real time
- Update the status page automatically for large-scale outages
- Integrate the monitoring systems more tightly with the communication tools
- Expand load testing to simulate high-traffic scenarios
- Introduce chaos engineering to test platform resilience regularly
- Add traffic pattern metrics, including the ratio of current connections to the maximum allowed
- Add auto-scaling that adjusts resource capacity to traffic patterns
- Lessons
HubSpot concluded that earlier detection of the abnormal traffic surge could have prevented the cascading failure, and that health checks have to keep running during operations such as configuration updates so that working load balancers are not removed together. The late status page update caused confusion for customers.
IL-0044Prometheus OOMKilled in a loop while replaying its write-ahead log after a kube-prometheus-stack upgradeSaifeddine Rajhi2024- Symptoms
After an upgrade of the kube-prometheus-stack Helm chart, several pods stayed not ready. Among them was prometheus-prometheus-operator-prometheus-0, showing 3/4 Running and a recent termination.
- Trigger
During the kube-prometheus-stack Helm chart upgrade, Prometheus had to replay its write-ahead log on startup, and the replay needed more memory than its limit allowed.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The team noticed pods not ready after the Helm chart upgrade and found the OOMKilled termination with kubectl describe pod.
- Remediation
- ran promtool tsdb analyze inside the Prometheus pod to find high-cardinality metrics such as haproxy_server_http_responses_total
- Action items
- Verify that the memory overhead during WAL replay stays within acceptable limits, for example 10 to 15%, and do not run Prometheus close to its memory limit
- Optimise storage, scraping and remote write configuration and upgrade to newer Prometheus releases
- Recover automatically from OOM crash loops, for example by deleting the WAL on OOM events
- Enforce scrape limits so Prometheus stops scraping targets when memory use passes a threshold
- Lessons
Size Prometheus for its restart, not only for steady state: WAL replay can need far more memory than normal running, and a Prometheus that already runs near its limit can be OOM-killed during the replay. Much of Prometheus memory use comes from cardinality, which promtool tsdb analyze can measure even when Prometheus itself is down.
These 3 cases involve Container memory limit and In-memory cache. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause3
Configuration change1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
Software defect1 case
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
Capacity exhaustion1 case
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Organisation