Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

1. IL-0226 Azure Front Door edge servers crashed worldwide on incompatible configuration metadata, causing timeouts and DNS errors

   Microsoft Azure2025

   Symptoms

   From 15:41 UTC on 29 October 2025, customers and Microsoft services using Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN) got connection timeout errors and DNS resolution issues. Monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Intermittent timeoutsDNS resolution failuresService outageHigh latency

   Trigger

   At 15:35 UTC a specific sequence of valid customer configuration changes, made across two different AFD control plane build versions, produced incompatible customer configuration metadata that was deployed to the edge sites.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   CDN and edge networkAuthoritative DNS servers and records

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsChange with a delayed effectIneffective rollbackExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   The configuration protection system detected the data plane impact and blocked configuration changes at 15:43 UTC, and monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Remediation

   • The configuration protection system automatically blocked all new and in-flight configuration changes worldwide
   • Removed the problematic customer configurations from the latest LKG snapshot by hand
   • Blocked all customer configuration changes from propagating to the data plane
   • Deployed the updated LKG configuration across the global fleet
   • Moved Azure Portal away from Azure Front Door
   • Rebalanced traffic by hand to a few healthy edge sites, then switched back to automatic traffic management
   • Blocked all AFD customer configuration changes at the Azure Resource Manager level until safeguards were in place

   Action items

   • Fix the control plane incompatibility and the data plane bug
   • Process each customer configuration completely and synchronously before production stages
   • Add stages to the phased configuration rollout, with longer bake time between them
   • Move configuration processing on data plane servers into isolated worker processes
   • Reduce configuration propagation time from 45 minutes to about 15 minutes
   • Test backwards compatibility with configurations generated by earlier control plane builds
   • Move critical first-party infrastructure to an active-active setup with fail away
   • Isolate customer configuration and traffic with micro cell segmentation of the AFD data plane
   • Restore customer configurations within one hour by using the local configuration cache
   • Cut data plane recovery further, to about 10 minutes
   • Remove delays in Azure Service Health alerts by raising resource thresholds
   • Extend automated Azure Service Health alerts to similar classes of service degradation
   • Fail over support request systems faster so Premier and Unified customers can always open requests

   Lessons

   Microsoft describes configuration propagation risk as inherent to a global Content Delivery Network, in which route, WAF and origin changes must be deployed quickly worldwide. Both this incident and the 9 October AFD incident came from that risk. This time the incompatible metadata passed a protection system that advances only on healthy data plane signals, because the crash came later from delayed asynchronous processing. Some learnings and repair items from the earlier incident applied here as well. Microsoft advises customers to build a resilient global HTTP ingress layer that stays available during regional or network disruptions, to manage resources through the REST API or PowerShell when management portals are unavailable, and to configure Azure Service Health alerts so the right people hear about service issues.

   View case
2. IL-0342 DigitalOcean's AMS3, LON1 and SFO2 data centers lost Internet connectivity in repeated waves as edge routers failed

   DigitalOcean2023

   Symptoms

   From 09:55 UTC on 9 August 2023, DigitalOcean's AMS3, LON1 and SFO2 datacenters lost Internet access in waves of 10 to 15 minutes, about an hour apart. Users saw connectivity issues, latency and timeout errors on Droplets and on Droplet-based services such as Load Balancers, Kubernetes and Database clusters.

   Network unreachableIntermittent timeoutsHigh latency

   Trigger

   The edge routers received an RPKI-related routing update, and the operating system software on them crashed its routing process on that update.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   BGP routing

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusHarmful manual action

   Remediation

   • Rolled out a software update to the edge routers running the affected version, site by site
   • Rebalanced traffic on the congested routes between AMS3 and FRA1
   • Rolled out the fix to the redundant networking equipment so a failover would not hit the bug

   Action items

   • Upgrade all global edge routers to remove the bug
   • Bring the network upgrades already done in Asia to Europe and North America

   View case
3. IL-0222 Google Cloud US regions had heavy packet loss and some went unreachable after the network control plane was descheduled

   Google Cloud2019

   Symptoms

   On Sunday 2 June 2019, with user impact beginning between 11:47 and 11:49 US/Pacific, Google Cloud projects in several US regions saw elevated packet loss from network congestion, and some regions became unreachable. Customers saw higher latency, intermittent errors and lost connectivity to instances in us-central1, us-east1, us-east4, us-west2, northamerica-northeast1 and southamerica-east1, while us-west1, Europe and Asia had no regional congestion.

   Packet lossNetwork unreachableHigh latencyHigh error rateMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   At 11:45 US/Pacific a relatively rare type of datacenter maintenance event started in one physical location, and the automation that runs it descheduled logical clusters that also held network control plane jobs in other physical locations.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)BGP routingBackbone network (WAN)

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusCircular dependencyLimited debug accessIneffective rollback

   Detection

   Google engineers were alerted to the failure two minutes after it began and started the incident process used for the most serious production incidents. The first customer notice appeared on the status page at 12:53 US/Pacific.

   Remediation

   • Lowered the priority of less critical network traffic classes to reduce congestion
   • Halted the datacenter automation software responsible for the maintenance event
   • Rescheduled the network control plane and its supporting infrastructure in each location
   • Rebuilt and redistributed the lost network control plane configuration, rolling it out from 14:03
   • Directed service traffic away from the affected regions
   • Moved the Cloud VPN control plane in three regions out of its fail-safe state

   Action items

   • Keep the maintenance automation off until safeguards stop it descheduling jobs in several physical locations at once
   • Harden the cluster management software to reject such requests whatever their origin
   • Reconfigure the network control plane to reject maintenance requests of the type involved
   • Make the network control plane in each location persist its configuration
   • Let the network stay in fail static mode longer when the control plane is lost
   • Review, update and test emergency response tooling and procedures, including customer communication tooling, for such network failures
   • Extend continuous disaster recovery testing to this and similarly catastrophic failures

   View case
4. IL-0338 Google Cloud HTTP(S) and TCP/SSL Proxy load balancers returned 502s or reset connections on 33% to 87% of requests

   Google Cloud2018

   Symptoms

   From 12:17 to 12:49 PDT on 17 July 2018, Google Cloud HTTP(S) Load Balancers answered a share of requests with 502 return codes, and connections to TCP/SSL Proxy Load Balancers were reset. The share of failed requests moved between 33% and 87% during those 32 minutes, and automated monitoring alerted Google engineers at 12:19.

   High error rateConnection resetsHigh latency

   Trigger

   A configuration change in the production environment intermittently set off a bug in a new feature of the second-layer Google Front Ends.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Cloud load balancerCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Automated monitoring alerted Google's engineering team at 12:19 PDT, two minutes after the 502s began.

   Remediation

   • Reverted the configuration change at 12:44 PDT, which stopped the GFE restarts

   Action items

   • Add safeguards that disable features not yet in service
   • Harden the GFE testing stack against latent bugs in production binaries that make a task restart
   • Isolate the shards of GFE pools further from each other to reduce the scope of failures
   • Build a consolidated dashboard of all configuration changes for GFE pools

   View case

By root cause1