Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0027 All CoreDNS pods landed on one node, the node ran out of memory, and DNS for the whole service went down

   Backpackr2025

   Symptoms

   Services on the production Amazon EKS cluster behind the idus marketplace threw intermittent errors whose cause was hard to pin down. Calls to external services such as RDS and Redis failed now and then, and whenever DNS traffic spiked, domain lookups answered slowly or failed outright.

   DNS resolution failuresIntermittent connection failuresHigh latencyOOMKilledService outage

   Trigger

   All CoreDNS pods were scheduled onto the same node, and that node's memory usage spiked until it ran out of memory.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CoreDNSClient-side DNS resolver and cachekubeletContainer memory limitNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsSingle point of failureNo caching

   Detection

   The write-up does not say how the full outage was noticed. The earlier DNS trouble showed up as intermittent service errors, and investigating failed calls to RDS and Redis led to DNS resolution failures.

   Remediation

   • deployed NodeLocal DNSCache as a DaemonSet in front of CoreDNS
   • added a PodDisruptionBudget (maxUnavailable 1) and topologySpreadConstraints across zones for CoreDNS
   • lowered ndots from 5 to 2 with dnsConfig in the Deployments

   Lessons

   The CoreDNS setup that EKS creates by default (two pods) can be enough for a small or development cluster but becomes a bottleneck in a large production cluster, and DNS is a single point of failure that needs high availability and room to scale. Tuning the CoreDNS cache and buffer size only relieved the symptoms; the real load came from the extra queries that ndots:5 generates for external names. A CoreDNS pod without a memory limit can share a node's fate with everything else on it.

   View case
2. IL-0195 The kube-apiservers of a cluster with more than 200 nodes ran out of memory and crashed one after another under mass LIST requests from Cilium agents

   Palark2023

   Symptoms

   A tech support engineer called Palark to say that a customer's cluster, production environment included, had practically stopped working. On the control plane nodes the kube-apiserver processes had used up all the memory and were crashing and restarting over and over, so the Kubernetes API was unreachable and completely non-functional.

   Control plane unresponsiveOOMKilled

   Trigger

   Cilium agent pods on more than 200 nodes sent LIST requests to the Kubernetes API en masse at the same time.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Kubernetes API serverCilium

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   A tech support engineer phoned the team to report that the customer's cluster was practically non-operational.

   Remediation

   • added CPU and memory to the control plane nodes in two steps, from 8 CPUs and 16 GB of RAM to 16 CPUs and 64 GB, until the API stabilised
   • restarted the Cilium agents in a test window agreed with the customer to reproduce the memory growth
   • deployed a FlowSchema and a PriorityLevelConfiguration named cilium-pods that limit and queue LIST requests from the Cilium service accounts to cilium.io resources
   • reduced the control plane nodes back to their original resources

   Action items

   • Make an API Priority and Fairness configuration a standard part of Palark's Kubernetes platform

   Lessons

   In a large cluster, many agents sending LIST requests at once can exhaust kube-apiserver memory, and with several API servers the crash moves from one to the next. APF can hold back such a client: a FlowSchema matches its requests and a PriorityLevelConfiguration gives them a small concurrency share and a queue, so the requests run more slowly instead of all at once. With APF enabled, the total concurrency it divides is the sum of --max-requests-inflight (default 400) and --max-mutating-requests-inflight (default 200), shared among priority levels in proportion to their assured concurrency shares, so raising one level's share lowers every other level's limit. Long-running requests such as logs and exec, and WATCH requests, are not subject to APF. The response headers X-Kubernetes-PF-FlowSchema-UID and X-Kubernetes-PF-PriorityLevel-UID show where a request landed, and the metrics Apiserver_flowcontrol_rejected_requests_total, Apiserver_current_inqueue_requests and Apiserver_flowcontrol_request_execution_seconds, with the debug endpoints /debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_priority_levels and /debug/api_priority_and_fairness/dump_queues, show how the queues behave.

   View case
3. IL-0001 Cluster-wide DNS outage after CoreDNS pods were OOM-killed again and again under a burst of DNS queries

   Zalando2019

   Symptoms

   Customers of the Zalando Fashion Store got a high rate of errors on all web product pages and outfit pages for more than an hour. The errors came from the main data aggregation layer service, which runs in one of Zalando's Kubernetes clusters.

   High error rateDNS resolution failuresOOMKilledMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Calls from the aggregation layer to a single, not very important downstream service started timing out. The aggregation layer returned 404s for them, clients retried, and the resulting spike in requests became a spike in DNS queries to CoreDNS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   CoreDNSContainer memory limitClient-side DNS resolver and cache

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitNo cachingRetry stormUnreviewed defaultsExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The on-call engineer for the aggregation layer phoned the on-call Kubernetes engineer. Automatic paging did not happen because the cluster's monitoring and alerting ran inside the cluster and failed along with DNS. The Kubernetes engineer then saw that the CoreDNS pods were being OOM-killed.

   Remediation

   • Raised the CoreDNS memory requests and limits by hand from 100Mi to 2000Mi

   Action items

   • Introduce a more resilient DNS setup: CoreDNS fronted by dnsmasq on every node
   • Improve high-level alerting from outside the clusters, so that a cluster problem is known before or at the same time as applications are affected
   • Improve incident response processes and tooling so that any on-call engineer can escalate directly to other teams when automatic paging fails, for example through a chat bot

   Lessons

   The Kubernetes DNS setup was far from resilient enough: a single application could take down DNS for everything in the cluster. The blast radius of one application sending more DNS queries should be limited to one node at most, ideally to single pods. Known Kubernetes DNS problems, such as Linux kernel races in conntrack handling and the ndots 5 problem, were familiar to the team and partly mitigated, but their combined effect on the DNS infrastructure was worse than the team had understood. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster was not robust enough: when the cluster's DNS broke, it could not page anyone, and recovery took longer than it should have.

   View case

By root cause1