Cases2 cases
1 to 2 of 2
IL-0191A label selector accidentally added to the Loki distributor Service matched only the new pods of a rollout, which took all write traffic, were OOM-killed and stalled the rolloutGrafana Labs2022- Symptoms
During a rollout of the Grafana Loki distributor Deployment in one Grafana Cloud Logs environment, the write path went down for about 25 minutes. The newly started distributor pods were OOM-killed over and over, never passed their health and readiness checks, and the rollout stopped making progress.
- Trigger
Step 1 of moving the Loki ring off a separately deployed key-value store onto embedded memberlist added a new label, gossip_ring_member: 'true', to the distributor pods and Service, together with a small config change, and the change required a rollout of the distributors.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
The first clue was kubectl get pods and the kube_deployment_status_replicas_updated metric showing that only 16 of 140 distributor pods had been updated.
- Remediation
- scaled the distributor Deployment out horizontally so the load spread over more pods with the new label and the rollout could continue
- reverted the migration step to end the outage
- set service_ignored_labels:: [$._config.gossip_member_label] and passed it to k.util.serviceFor so the label is no longer copied into the Service selector
- Action items
- Update the function that generates a Service from a Deployment or StatefulSet to handle edge cases, including this one
- Lessons
A Service whose selector is built by copying every label of a workload changes which pods it matches as soon as a new label is added. During a rollout it then matches only the new pods, which receive all the traffic before there are enough of them. A few errors during a rollout in other environments hid the problem, because those environments gave distributors more memory and could absorb the shift. Manifest diffs kept for every pull request made it possible to see that the Service selector had changed.
IL-0035Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memoryNU.nl2019- Symptoms
The NU.nl development team got reports that several services on one of its Kubernetes clusters behaved erratically: occasional error pages, slow responses and timeouts. The affected services were mostly internal tools and dashboards.
- Trigger
A new ElastAlert rule, deployed shortly before from the command line, that fired if the Cloudfront-* Elasticsearch indexes stopped receiving documents; those indexes take a few million requests per hour, and the rule made ElastAlert's memory grow without bound.
- Root cause
- Component
- Contributing factor
- Detection
Users reported error pages, slow responses and timeouts from several services; no alert fired.
- Remediation
- terminated the NotReady nodes one by one so the auto-scaling group replaced them (the new nodes also went NotReady, but Prometheus and Grafana landed on a stable node)
- found the ElastAlert pods' memory growth on the Grafana pod memory dashboard
- fixed the ElastAlert problem that caused the memory growth
- Action items
- Define alerts on resource usage such as CPU, memory and disk space
- Keep researching an alerting strategy that combines Elasticsearch, Prometheus Alertmanager and New Relic
- Consider exporting metrics out of the cluster and running Grafana outside it, on EC2 or a separate Kubernetes cluster
- Either visualise the important metrics in the ELK stack or make Prometheus and Grafana more available, and improve the metrics strategy
- Set resource limits for ElastAlert through the Helm values
- Configure namespaces with default memory requests and limits
- Isolate customer-facing workloads from build, logging and monitoring workloads (a dedicated node group, or later a separate tools cluster)
- Deploy everything through automation such as Jenkins pipelines, and consider a GitOps approach
- Deploy through a pipeline that includes a smoke test step
- Make Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure work part of the team's sprints, picked up by all team members while pairing with more experienced members, and hold workshops that go deep into specific topics
- Lessons
Fixing the root cause covers only a small part of what an incident can teach; the chain of smaller failures around it is where most of the learning is. A pod without a memory limit can take whole nodes down, so limits need defaults at the namespace level. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster it watches goes blind with it. Changes installed by hand from the command line leave the rest of the team without a record of what changed.
These 2 cases involve Container memory limit and Configuration templating. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.
By root cause1
Configuration change2 cases
- Contributing factor
- Organisation
IL-0191A label selector accidentally added to the Loki distributor Service matched only the new pods of a rollout, which took all write traffic, were OOM-killed and stalled the rolloutGrafana Labs2022IL-0035Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memoryNU.nl2019