Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

1. IL-0432 AutoReserve notifications silently went unsent as Memorystore for Redis 3.2 rejected writes with OOM below its limit

   Hello Inc.2026

   Symptoms

   A bug report said that some reservation notifications in the AutoReserve restaurant reservation service never arrived. Of the several kinds of notification sent as a reservation progresses, only one kind sometimes arrived and sometimes did not.

   Writes rejectedMemory pressure

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   In-memory cache

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotUnsafe failure behaviourUnverified assumption

   Detection

   A bug report from AutoReserve said that some reservation notifications were not arriving.

   Remediation

   • Scaled the Memorystore for Redis instance from 8 GiB to 16 GiB, which did not stop the write rejections
   • Upgraded Redis from 3.2 to 7.2, which removed the fragmentation and stopped the write rejections
   • Moved the notification sent status from Redis to the relational database

   Action items

   • Consider enabling active defrag if physical memory use rises above 1.3 times logical memory use

   Lessons

   The logs and the instance page metrics did not show the cause; it took looking inside Redis with INFO memory to see physical memory far above logical memory. A cache is a place for values that can be rebuilt if lost and whose writes may fail, so the sent status, which had to persist and be decided once under concurrent processing, belonged in the relational database.

   View case
2. IL-0214 PagerDuty's Kafka brokers ran out of JVM heap one after another, and the event APIs rejected events with 502 responses

   PagerDuty2025

   Symptoms

   When a Kafka cluster of PagerDuty's US Service Regions began failing at 03:53 UTC on 28 August 2025, the first alerts pointed to one failing broker. More brokers then ran out of memory, and PagerDuty's event APIs began rejecting incoming events with a response status code of 502 while notifications, webhooks, chat integrations and the REST API degraded.

   Memory pressureHigh error rateThroughput degradation

   Trigger

   A new feature that recorded API key usage in a Kafka topic was being rolled out by configuration: 1% on 21 August, 5% and then 25% on 27 August, and 75% on 28 August. A logical error in the feature created a new Kafka producer for every API request instead of reusing one producer.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Message broker

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotSignal buried in noiseChange with a delayed effectExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Alerts pointed to one failing Kafka broker at the start of the first incident, and alerts fired again at 16:38 UTC when Kafka performance degraded for the second time. Critical alerts about core API errors were buried among webhook pages.

   Remediation

   • Expanded the Kafka cluster and removed the first failing broker
   • Doubled the Kafka broker heap size and applied it with a rolling restart across the cluster
   • Added status page updates by hand through backup procedures when automated publishing failed
   • Recovered Kafka-dependent services, some by manual intervention, and backfilled lost data with scripts
   • In the second incident, doubled the heap again with another rolling restart
   • Rolled back the API usage feature with a pull request that stopped it from publishing Kafka messages

   Action items

   • Remove the dependency that blocked status page automation and simplify and republish the manual runbook
   • Run live drills regularly so status updates go out even when parts of the platform are degraded
   • Expand JVM and Kafka monitoring of heap, garbage collection and producer and consumer health
   • Strengthen service dependency mapping so cascading failures are easier to trace
   • Collect customer impact metrics into incident workflows automatically
   • Add stricter change management guardrails, with readiness checklists and slower ramp-up windows for major rollouts
   • Improve recovery mechanisms in the streaming systems
   • Automate communication workflows such as status page updates, internal and external syncs and reminders
   • Test major incident workflows monthly with chaos engineering, such as status page failover
   • Define clearer incident severity levels and roles, including dedicated communications liaisons

   Lessons

   PagerDuty found its message processing more intricate than it had thought: some services had to be restarted to pick up changes, some API activity produced far more messages than expected, and it was hard to tell which parts of the system put heavy load on Kafka. Because producers and JVM heap were barely observed, responders could not see the first failure until several downstream systems were affected, and no one on the call held a model of the whole system. Enabling the feature through configuration rather than a separate deployment was meant as a safety step but made the outage harder to link to the change. Runbooks and backfill scripts were imperfect but gave responders a head start, and the second incident was mitigated in about 50 minutes by repeating the first incident's steps.

   View case
3. IL-0285 Clever Cloud's Pulsar brokers stalled in a minor upgrade, then hypervisors overloaded and crashed with kernel panics

   Clever Cloud2024

   Symptoms

   On 2 August 2024, two minutes after Clever Cloud's data team started a minor rolling upgrade of its Apache Pulsar messaging cluster to release 3.3.1, monitoring showed connection problems with the messaging platform. Producing data into the event bus failed, the backlog grew while no new producers or consumers succeeded, and agents on hypervisors, log forwarders on load balancers and deployments were affected. At 10:20 CEST the Pulsar cluster was declared defective.

   Deploys failingSustained high node CPUMemory pressureNode kernel panicOOMKilledAutoscaler misbehaviourMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   At 10:06 CEST the data team began a minor rolling upgrade of Apache Pulsar to release 3.3.1 that also switched on a new balancer for bundle placement: the extensible load manager (loadManagerClassName=org.apache.pulsar.broker.loadbalance.extensions.ExtensibleLoadManagerImpl) with the TransferShedder load shedding strategy instead of the native OverloadShedder.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Message brokerTelemetry agentLinux kernelAutomated capacity manager

   Contributing factor

   No configuration testsMonitoring blind spotIneffective rollbackUnreviewed defaultsAutomation amplificationRetry stormCircular dependency

   Detection

   Monitoring showed connection issues to the messaging platform at 10:08 CEST, two minutes after the upgrade began, and engineers confirmed at 10:09 that producing data into the event bus failed. Monitoring did not catch the first broker's failure to create the system topic, because that broker stayed up.

   Remediation

   • Rolled back the new unload strategy while keeping Pulsar 3.3.1
   • Shut down the client proxies to release the brokers
   • Switched deployment notification events to RabbitMQ as a workaround
   • Stopped all brokers and started only one, which loaded the conflicting system topic so it could be deleted, then started all brokers
   • Restarted the messaging proxies, after which messages flowed again
   • Stopped the watchdog so it would not reload every failed component, and started components one by one
   • Disabled Metrics API ingestion to protect its storage cluster
   • Stopped the long-term storage for observability metrics (the Warp10/FoundationDB cluster) to free resources
   • Put all monitoring instances in all regions into maintenance so they stopped sending events to the orchestrator
   • Killed the overloaded small VMs one by one
   • Flagged 12 hypervisors to drain workload and shut down some load balancers to free CPU and memory
   • Cleaned zombie VMs to speed up recovery
   • Cleared the monitoring alert queue so queued events would not flood the orchestrator
   • Added parked hypervisors to EU-FR-1 to relieve the overloaded ones
   • Removed an overloaded RabbitMQ node from the cluster used by the orchestrator
   • Rolling-restarted every regional L7 load balancer and every L4 load balancer
   • Restarted all HV agents and the add-on provider APIs
   • Destroyed all dangling VMs stuck in the stopping state
   • Re-enabled Metrics API ingestion with a ramp-up QoS policy

   Action items

   • Track KPIs for Pulsar broker and cluster health, hypervisor load, I/O and kernel panic reboots, zombie VMs, RabbitMQ broker and cluster health and deployment queue consumption, each by time of event, detection, decision and resolution
   • Deal with too many monitoring alerts
   • Look at a backup bastion, because a regional bastion is vulnerable
   • Rework the control plane recovery process
   • Rework the correlation between monitoring and orchestration
   • Revisit fault domain separation against multi-tenancy
   • Rethink runtime images and the role of the hypervisor
   • Isolate waved release upgrades of Pulsar
   • Redesign runtime images with better hypervisor integration
   • Regionalise observability for redundancy
   • Set Vector's buffer.max_events and buffer.max_size for small VMs
   • Switch Vector's buffer.type from memory, the default, to disk
   • Change Vector's buffer.when_full from block, the default, to drop_newest
   • Tune journald verbosity and SystemMaxUse on small VMs
   • Add cgroups restrictions for better process control
   • Add I/O restrictions for the VM manager
   • Detect zombie VMs better

   Lessons

   The simulation process that validates non-minor releases was not applied to minor upgrades or to small configuration changes, and this one went straight to production. Running Clever Cloud on Clever Cloud turned into a chicken-and-egg situation: recovery needed the scheduler to carry out large actions while the control plane was itself slowed and the infrastructure had no free resources. Measuring each key indicator by time of event, detection, decision and resolution showed where the team had lacked visibility or reaction and challenged established rules.

   View case
4. IL-0373 Heroku Postgres Essential-tier databases in the EU region ran out of memory and refused connections, twice in four days

   Heroku2024

   Symptoms

   From 22:31 UTC on 27 July 2024, 33 Heroku Postgres clusters in the EU (Dublin) region could not serve requests and ran into memory problems, and some Essential-tier customers could not connect to their databases. Customers trying to reach an affected database received out of memory errors.

   Memory pressureService outage

   Trigger

   A third-party vendor deployed a change to a monitoring agent that runs on Heroku's Postgres database clusters.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   DatabaseTelemetry agent

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Heroku Support paged the technology team at 07:50 UTC on 28 July based on customer support tickets. The second occurrence also reached the technology team as an escalation from Heroku Support.

   Remediation

   • Allocated more resources and restarted the Postgres clusters, which fixed the first outage temporarily
   • Provisioned the previous version of the third-party monitoring software, which did not leak memory
   • The vendor applied an interim mitigation

   Action items

   • Add enhanced metrics collection for the third-party monitoring software
   • Evaluate the vendor's fixed release of the monitoring software and roll it out if acceptable

   View case

By root cause4