Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

1. IL-0083 Intermittent 5xx errors in a multi-tenant Kubernetes cluster came from internal DNS: the node-local dnsmasq hit its 150 concurrent query limit, did not cache cluster.local answers, and ndots search lookups flooded CoreDNS

   Adevinta2023

   Symptoms

   On a Friday afternoon a tenant of SCHIP, Adevinta's multi-tenant Kubernetes runtime, reported a spike of HTTP 5xx errors in some of its services. The drops in quality of service came back periodically through the following days, each one short, and were reported mostly around midnight.

   High error rateDNS resolution failuresHigh latency

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   CoreDNSClient-side DNS resolver and cacheTelemetry agent

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limitIgnored early signalUnverified assumption

   Detection

   A tenant reported a spike of HTTP 5xx errors in some of its services; the DNS Latency SLI had already been degraded for some time without being acted on.

   Remediation

   • raised the dnsmasq concurrent query limit from 150 to 1500
   • added a CoreDNS header block that sets the ra and aa flags and clears rd, so dnsmasq caches cluster.local answers
   • configured dnsmasq on each node to answer NXDOMAIN for unresolvable search-domain names instead of forwarding them to CoreDNS
   • changed the fluent-bit log router hostname to a fully qualified name
   • asked the affected tenants to use fully qualified names for internal calls

   Lessons

   The DNS Latency SLI had shown the problem long before anyone looked at it. An SLO only protects you when its SLIs are trusted and a drop is investigated. The investigation took a month partly because several on-call groups worked on it separately, without one place for observations and hypotheses, and sometimes chased hypotheses already discarded. Disprove one hypothesis before starting the next, and collect data the metrics system lacks: DNStop showed the garbage lookups that no dashboard did. With ndots:5, short service names multiply DNS traffic; a node-local cache only helps if it can cache the cluster DNS answers at all.

   View case
2. IL-0049 Partial DNS outage after CoreDNS scaled down and kube-proxy failed to delete stale conntrack entries

   Preply2020

   Symptoms

   Prometheus detected a high rate of 5xx responses on three services, called A, B and C in the write-up, and paged the on-call engineers through VictorOps at 22:18 EET. The 5xx rate was also visible in Kibana.

   DNS resolution failuresHigh error rateStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   Because load in the cluster was low, the CoreDNS autoscaler reduced the number of CoreDNS pods from 3 to 2.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   CoreDNSkube-proxyconntrack table

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplificationIgnored early signalNo caching

   Detection

   Prometheus alerted on a high 5xx rate on services A, B and C and paged on-call through VictorOps.

   Remediation

   • reverted the latest release of the affected service
   • a regular deploy created new nodes, the CoreDNS autoscaler added CoreDNS pods, and the conntrack table was rewritten

   Action items

   • Disable the autoscaler for CoreDNS
   • Run a DNS cache server in production
   • Monitor conntrack usage

   Lessons

   Scaling CoreDNS down is not free: if kube-proxy fails to clear conntrack entries for the removed pod, clients keep sending DNS queries to it. Known DNS weaknesses in a cluster should be prioritised before they cause an outage, and fixes that only treat consequences leave the underlying conntrack problem in place.

   View case
3. IL-0047 Pod-to-pod requests delayed by 5, 10 or 15 seconds because of DNS lookups lost to a conntrack race

   MindTickle2019

   Symptoms

   Pod-to-pod calls were intermittently slow and the web application felt slow overall. A request that pod A sent at time x reached pod B at x + 5s, x + 10s or x + 15s, always a multiple of five seconds.

   Intermittent timeoutsHigh latencyDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   The C library resolver sent the A and AAAA queries for each lookup on the same port; where DNAT or SNAT translation takes place, a race condition in conntrack sometimes left one of the queries unanswered, and the resolver waited 5 seconds before retrying.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   conntrack tableClient-side DNS resolver and cacheLinux kernel

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   The team noticed intermittent delays in pod-to-pod calls and slowness in the web application, and that the delays were always multiples of five seconds.

   Remediation

   • added the single-request-reopen option to dnsConfig in the deployment specs
   • set GRPC_DNS_RESOLVER=native in the Dockerfiles of gRPC applications so they used the libc resolver
   • checked with tcpdump port 53 that A and AAAA queries left from different ports

   Lessons

   Delays that are exact multiples of five seconds point to DNS lookups being retried after the resolver's 5-second timeout. A resolver option set in the pod spec only helps processes that use the libc resolver; runtimes with their own resolver, such as gRPC with c-ares, ignore it.

   View case

By root cause1