Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentAdmission webhookClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases11 cases

6 to 10 of 11

  1. Symptoms

    At 13:15 on 9 June 2021 a user reported in the #ask-cloud-platform channel that deploying a UAT application failed on its Ingress resource.

    Trigger

    The Cloud Platform team upgraded the ModSec ingress controller module to v3.33.0; the deployment appeared to succeed.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A user reported the deployment error in the #ask-cloud-platform Slack channel at 13:15.

    Remediation
    • rolled back the ModSec ingress controller module to v0.0.7
    Action items
    • Find out why the issue was not flagged in the test cluster and try to reproduce it, possibly with a new test (ticket #2972)
    • Add a smoke test that checks the alerts in Alertmanager (ticket #2973)
    • Add a helloworld app that uses the ModSec controller so smoke tests can check that traffic works (ticket #2974)
    • Make a new version of the ModSec module work on EKS for both live-1 and live; neither the old nor the new version works on live (ticket #2975)
  2. Symptoms

    A production service at Airbnb showed a high error rate and could not be deployed. The deploy failed with a cryptic Kubernetes error about being unable to access invalid index 5.

    Trigger

    A change to the mutating admission controller, which had been rolled out within the previous month, had gone in seven days before the incident surfaced; when it had to delete two items from an array in a spec, it generated an invalid JSON patch that removed index 2 and then index 3.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The affected service reported a high error rate and its deploy failed; the slow degradation of other services over the previous seven days had gone unnoticed.

    Remediation
    • deleted the mutating admission controller from the affected cluster
    Action items
    • Create alerts from the existing metrics that would have shown the problem earlier
    Lessons

    Keep in mind that a mutating admission controller exists in the cluster; a recently added one is easy to forget during an incident. Search for the exact error message early instead of working on the visible symptoms. Page a teammate when progress stalls.

  3. Symptoms

    At 14:41 CET on 4 November 2020 users reported timeouts when deploying to Hellman, the production Kubernetes cluster. The timeouts were confirmed at 15:04.

    Trigger

    During an Alcide workshop that began at 13:00 CET, an Alcide admission controller was applied to the production cluster at 13:13 in the belief that it would not disrupt anything.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Users reported timeouts when deploying to the Hellman cluster at 14:41 CET; the timeouts were verified at 15:04.

    Remediation
    • toggled the Alcide admission controller to verify that it caused the timeouts
    • permanently deleted the Alcide admission controller
    Action items
    • Monitor Kubernetes deployments for timeouts
    • Monitor 5xx status codes from the Kubernetes API server
    Lessons

    New components are applied in sandbox clusters, not in production. The team needs enough Alcide knowledge to maintain the component until it is fully deprecated.

  4. Symptoms

    At 12:39 on 7 September 2020 the Cloud Platform team found that the Ingress API of the live-1 cluster was refusing every POST request. A user who provisioned a new service could not create an ingress into the cluster. The incident was declared at 12:54.

    Trigger

    Version 0.1.0 of the team's ingress controller module started creating a ValidatingWebhookConfiguration resource, and one new 0.1.0 ingress controller in the live-1 cluster failed to be created because of AWS resource limits.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The Ingress API was found refusing 100% of POST requests at 12:39; the incident was declared at 12:54.

    Remediation
    • removed by hand all the additional admission controllers created by module version 0.1.0
    • removed the admission webhook from the ingress controller module and released version 0.1.1
    • upgraded every ingress module on version 0.1.0 to 0.1.1
    Lessons

    Turning on the validating webhook in the shared ingress controller module made the webhook a single point of failure for every ingress controller pod in the ingress-controllers namespace: when one controller could not come up, no team could create an ingress.

  5. Symptoms

    Jetstack was upgrading the master of a development cluster that many teams use to test their apps during the working day, a regional Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster in europe-west1. The upgrade ran through Jetstack's GKE Terraform pipeline and did not finish before the 20-minute Terraform timeout, while the GKE console still showed the cluster as upgrading.

    Trigger

    A planned master upgrade of the shared development cluster. The same upgrade had been done on another pre-production environment earlier that day, and no API downtime was expected.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The first sign was the master upgrade missing the 20-minute Terraform timeout; re-running the pipeline returned the kube-apiserver unhealthy error. The cause was identified with the help of Google Support.

    Remediation
    • Deleted the OPA ValidatingAdmissionWebhook resource during a window of API server access
    Action items
    • Limit the OPA webhook to the namespaces where the policy applies and development teams have access
    • Enable the webhook only for Ingress and Service resources, the only resources the policy validates
    • Add a liveness probe so OPA is restarted when it stops responding, and update the OPA documentation
    • Follow the open upstream Kubernetes issue about this behaviour
    Lessons

    With alerting on API server response times, the team might have seen CREATE and UPDATE requests slow down across the board as soon as the OPA-backed webhook was first deployed. Every workload needs probes: OPA looked so simple to deploy that the team skipped the Helm chart, which adds a livenessProbe for the admission controller containers among other adjustments to the tutorial configuration. Others had hit the same problem, and an upstream issue to improve it was still open.

Check your cluster for this

These 11 cases involve Admission webhook and Ingress controller. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause7

Software defect2 cases

Organisation
  1. IL-0053 Unauthenticated ingress-nginx admission webhook let anyone on the pod network run code and read every Secret in the cluster (IngressNightmare, CVE-2025-1974)
    Wiz2025
  2. IL-0032 Mutating admission controller generated broken JSON patches, silently blocking deploys for a week until a production service ran down to two pods
    Airbnb2020

Dependency failure1 case

  1. IL-0103 During an EKS node AMI update, Istio sidecars crash-looped because hundreds of pods restarting at once overloaded the external certificate authority behind istiod

Breaking change in an upgrade3 cases

  1. IL-0180 A GKE control plane auto-upgrade from 1.22 to 1.23 removed the v1beta1 Ingress and ValidatingWebhookConfiguration APIs that Istio 1.7.4 still used, and Istio stopped working in production
  2. IL-0060 Kubernetes 1.24 upgrade removed the master node label that Calico route reflectors selected on, dropping all pod routes and taking Reddit down for 314 minutes
    Reddit2023
  3. IL-0090 After an upgrade of the ModSec ingress controller module, its validating webhook served a certificate for the wrong service name and blocked every Ingress create and change

Certificate or credential expiry1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0107 Kyverno stuck in a crash loop behind a webhook with failurePolicy fail blocked every change to Kubernetes Service objects for 88 minutes
    DFDS2022

Configuration change2 cases

Organisation
  1. IL-0108 An Alcide admission controller applied to the production cluster during a workshop made create and update requests on Deployments time out
    DFDS2020
  2. IL-0008 An unresponsive OPA validating webhook crash-looped the API server during a GKE master upgrade, and node auto-repair then recreated every node

Faulty deployment1 case

Contributing factor
  1. IL-0088 A validating admission webhook added by a new ingress controller module version made the live-1 cluster reject every new Ingress with an x509 error

Capacity exhaustion1 case

Organisation
  1. IL-0037 Image registry rate-limited a whole region after a crash-looping DaemonSet with imagePullPolicy Always pulled through three NAT instances