Cases19 cases

6 to 10 of 19

1. IL-0101 After Google forced a GKE control plane upgrade to 1.33.2 at a deprecation deadline, no new node could initialise, so autoscaling and spot node replacement stopped for 15 hours

   Wealthy2025sev1

   Symptoms

   Nodes that already existed kept running, but every new node, spot or standard, on either v1.32 or v1.33, failed to initialise and could not join the cluster. Spot nodes that were preempted and recreated never came back, so services degraded progressively: background workers on spot instances, reporting services and order allocation stopped completely, and the APIs on existing nodes kept answering but could not scale for load spikes.

   Scale-up failureContainer crash loopService outageDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   Google upgraded the GKE control plane from v1.32.x to v1.33.2 at the version deprecation deadline, although auto-upgrade was disabled on the node pools.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   GKE control planeNode poolClient-side DNS resolver and cachePersistent volumes and stateful setsConfigMaps and Secrets

   Contributing factor

   Deferred upgradesSingle point of failureIneffective rollbackNo headroom

   Remediation

   • Created a new GKE cluster at v1.33, the version of the forced upgrade
   • Upgraded Istio to 1.27.1 for Kubernetes 1.33 compatibility
   • Updated the cert-manager configuration for Kubernetes 1.33
   • Migrated all production workloads to the new cluster and verified pod scheduling, DNS resolution, PVC mounting and external integrations
   • Decommissioned the broken cluster

   Action items

   • Configure all clusters to use the GKE stable release channel
   • Implement a separate management cluster for Argo CD, monitoring and other control components (Q4 2025)
   • Review spot instance usage for critical workloads and add on-demand fallback pools
   • Document the SRE upgrade procedure: management cluster first, production after a monitoring period of several days
   • Document a Kubernetes, Istio and cert-manager compatibility matrix
   • Create an automated upgrade testing pipeline
   • Reserve static IPs for quick migrations
   • Pin versions of Istio, cert-manager, CSI and DNS addons
   • Stay current with stable releases and regularly check GKE alerts and announcements to avoid deprecation deadlines

   Lessons

   GKE upgrades the control plane at a version's deprecation deadline even when auto-upgrade is disabled, so staying inside the supported version window is how to avoid a forced upgrade. A control plane upgrade can leave existing nodes healthy while every new node fails, and spot nodes that cannot rejoin after preemption turn this into cascading failures. Relying heavily on spot instances for critical workers turned a node join failure into a progressive outage. Kubernetes upgrades have to be planned together with dependent components such as Istio and cert-manager, and without a standby cluster on the same provider there was no immediate failover; the only recovery left was building a new cluster.

   View case
2. IL-0079 A GKE node auto-upgrade to an ubuntu_containerd image with a kernel regression left kube-proxy unable to apply its ip6tables rules, so load balancer health checks failed and several clusters lost all ingress traffic

   Altinity2025

   Symptoms

   On a Saturday, an OpsGenie alert fired for a ClickHouse cluster in Altinity.Cloud that had gone silent: no queries, no metrics, and no logs from customers trying to connect. The pods were running and the nodes looked healthy, but no traffic reached the database. Other clusters soon showed the same thing, and external access was blocked across several GKE clusters.

   Service outage

   Trigger

   GKE automatically upgraded worker nodes to the ubuntu_containerd image 1.32.3-gke.1785003, which ships kernel 6.8.0-1022-gke.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   kube-proxyNode operating system imageLinux kernelCloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Unpatched known bugNo staged rollout

   Detection

   An OpsGenie alert fired when one ClickHouse cluster stopped receiving queries, metrics and customer connection logs.

   Remediation

   • added maintenance exceptions to pause all upgrades on the GKE clusters that were not yet affected
   • changed the load balancer health check policy to ignore failed kube-proxy health checks, so traffic flowed to the nodes again
   • began migrating the affected clusters from the ubuntu_containerd to the cos_containerd node image by recreating nodes

   Action items

   • Expand image pre-testing pipelines to catch regressions earlier
   • Enable notifications for upcoming GKE auto-upgrades
   • Make GKE maintenance windows required across the fleet to control when upgrades roll out
   • Track Google's issue and wait for a patched Ubuntu image

   Lessons

   A managed node upgrade can break kube-proxy in a way that leaves pods and nodes looking healthy while the load balancer sends nothing, because the load balancer health check depends on kube-proxy. kube-proxy's own logs showed the cause. Altinity recommends that GKE users on ubuntu_containerd restore traffic by switching to externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster, which disables the kube-proxy health check in the load balancer, move production workloads to cos_containerd, and pause auto-upgrades where possible until a patched image has been confirmed and tested.

   View case
3. IL-0201 A framework upgrade caused kernel panics in GitHub's Kubernetes infrastructure, and GitHub.com web and API requests, mostly for issues and pull requests, failed intermittently for about 16 hours

   GitHub2025

   Symptoms

   From 18:05 UTC on March 17, 2025, GitHub.com web and API requests failed now and then for a small percentage of users, mostly requests about issues and pull requests. At 18:39 UTC the status page reported degraded performance for Issues.

   High error rateIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   A framework upgrade rolled out to GitHub's Kubernetes infrastructure caused kernel panics.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Linux kernel

   Contributing factor

   –

   Detection

   The status page opened the incident at 18:39 UTC, 34 minutes after the failures began, as an investigation of reports of degraded performance for Issues.

   Remediation

   • Downgraded the framework upgrade that caused the kernel panics
   • Disabled the problematic feature of the framework

   Action items

   • Investigate why the upgrade caused the kernel panics
   • Take steps to temporarily prevent the problem from coming back
   • Work out longer-term patch plans
   • Improve observability so that similar classes of problems can be reacted to quickly

   View case
4. IL-0404 All BSEE SaaS customer pods on EKS crash-looped after Karpenter moved nodes to Bottlerocket v1.26.0, which broke Java

   PortSwigger2024

   Symptoms

   On 24 October 2024 every BSEE SaaS customer instance showed the Environment Unavailable message, and the SaaS Uptime Over Time metric dropped sharply at 04:45. The Technology Team learned of the outage when the Growth team posted about it at 08:07 and a member of the Product team told the Technology Team verbally at 08:15.

   Container crash loopService outage

   Trigger

   AWS made Bottlerocket v1.26.0 the latest Bottlerocket AMI in eu-west-1 between 02:00 and 04:30, and at 04:00 Karpenter saw the new version and started replacing the EC2 nodes of the production EKS cluster with it.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Node operating system imageKarpenter

   Contributing factor

   Unpinned version

   Detection

   The Growth team reported the outage in the BSEE cloud onboarding issues channel at 08:07, and a member of the Product team told the Technology Team verbally at 08:15. The SaaS Uptime Over Time metric had already dropped at 04:45.

   Remediation

   • Reverted all EC2 instances in the SaaS production account to Bottlerocket v1.25.0
   • Deployed Bottlerocket 1.25.0 across all EKS clusters and rolled out new EKS nodes

   Action items

   • Change the Karpenter resources to deploy a specific versioned Bottlerocket AMI instead of the latest released AMI
   • Add the Bottlerocket release ATOM feed to an internal tooling release dashboard
   • Set up a public status page to communicate with customers

   View case
5. IL-0203 A routine Kubernetes cluster system update made the AWS Load Balancer Controller fail, so new pods were never registered with the ALB and Honeycomb's EU1 ingest and UI went down once the last old pods were replaced

   Honeycomb2024

   Symptoms

   Event ingestion and the Honeycomb UI in EU1 became unavailable at 22:00:10 UTC on April 9, 2024, and the status page reported that the EU1 instance was down. Both the ingestion service and the service behind the web UI stopped at roughly the same moment.

   Service outageStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   A routine system update to the Kubernetes cluster, rolled out earlier on April 9, followed by a regular deployment that replaced pods one at a time.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllerCloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotUnrepresentative stagingChange with a delayed effect

   Detection

   The first status post, saying the EU1 instance was down, went up at 15:08 PDT (22:08 UTC), about 8 minutes after the outage began. There was no alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller.

   Remediation

   • Restarted the AWS Load Balancer Controller
   • Rolled back the Kubernetes cluster system update

   Action items

   • Find the exact cause of the failure so the system update can be deployed safely
   • Add monitoring and alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller so on-call engineers learn of a failure quickly and can pause deployments

   Lessons

   A rolling deployment can look healthy while the component that wires new pods into the load balancer is broken; the failure only shows when the last old pod goes away. Honeycomb now treats the AWS Load Balancer Controller as a critical component that needs its own alerting, so deployments can be paused before they remove the last pods that still receive traffic. Extensive testing in development and staging did not reveal the bad interaction.

   View case

By root cause1