Cases8 cases

6 to 8 of 8

1. IL-0009 A duplicated generated name made Argo CD replace the InfluxDB Cloud production Application and delete the whole production environment

   InfluxData2022

   Symptoms

   Right after a pull request to the infrastructure-as-code repository was merged, every API endpoint of one InfluxDB Cloud production cluster began returning 404 errors. Writes and reads failed alike: no one could collect data, scheduled tasks failed to run and external queries did not work.

   Service outageResources deletedHigh error rate

   Trigger

   A merged pull request whose rendered YAML added a new Argo CD Application and AppProject that an automation error had named app01-cluster01, the name of the existing production Application, instead of app02-cluster01; reviewers did not notice the app01 and app02 difference.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Argo CDPersistent volumes and stateful setsConfiguration templating

   Contributing factor

   Missed in reviewNo runbookNo safeguard on destructive changeMonitoring blind spotAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Monitoring and alerting did not detect the issue right away, so the team's first response was to try to roll the change back rather than plan a recovery. The write-up does not say how the team found out.

   Remediation

   • stopped the revert of the merged pull request
   • restored the etcd metadata cluster
   • recreated the missing Kubernetes objects so the retained PersistentVolumes became available, then recreated the StatefulSets
   • restored the Zookeeper volumes from an hourly Velero backup
   • rebuilt the Kafka StatefulSet one pod at a time with health and readiness checks disabled
   • accepted writes into the Kafka write-ahead log and scaled up the write path with more replicas and higher memory requests and limits
   • recreated the storage pods, which downloaded data from object storage, reindexed it and replayed the write-ahead log
   • re-enabled Argo CD, queries, dashboards and scheduled tasks, restored replica counts and ran final QA checks

   Action items

   • Write runbooks for restoring state when Kubernetes objects such as PersistentVolumeClaims are deleted but the data on the underlying volumes is preserved
   • Set every volume in every environment to retain data when its PersistentVolumeClaim is deleted
   • Improve the process for handling public-facing incidents
   • Store generated YAML as one object per file, so an overwrite of an existing object shows up as such in review
   • Detect duplicate objects when generating YAML and warn before review, treating objects with the same group, namespace and name as the same even when the apiVersion string differs
   • Add the Argo CD Prune=false annotation to all stateful resources and to Namespace objects managed by Argo CD
   • Set FailOnSharedResource=true on Argo CD Applications so Argo CD fails before changing an object another Application manages or managed

   Lessons

   The biggest gap was that monitoring did not notice the deletion quickly, which pushed the team toward a reflex rollback; in a stateful system a revert can create a new, empty instance instead of bringing the old one back. Retained volumes and clients that retry writes are what kept data loss at zero. Rendering many objects into one file let an overwrite of an existing object look like an addition, so generated configuration needs one object per file and duplicate detection that compares objects the way Kubernetes does. Stateful resources need protection from pruning, and that protection must cover their Namespace too, or deleting the namespace removes everything inside it.

   View case
2. IL-0089 A test cluster deletion script run with the kube context pointing at the live-1 production cluster deleted its ingress controller, monitoring, logging, cert-manager, kiam and external-dns

   UK Ministry of Justice2020

   Symptoms

   At 18:27 on 21 September 2020 the Cloud Platform team detected that some services running on the live-1 production cluster had gone down, and some users could not reach them. The incident was declared at 18:40.

   Service outageResources deletedMonitoring outageStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   A script for deleting a test cluster was triggered while the kube context was pointing at the live-1 production cluster instead of the test cluster.

   Root cause

   Operator error

   Component

   Ingress controllerCredential broker for podsexternal-dnsCloud load balancerPrometheus

   Contributing factor

   No safeguard on destructive change

   Detection

   The first detection was at 18:27, and the incident was declared 13 minutes later, at 18:40.

   Remediation

   • restored the default ingress controller together with external-dns and kiam, which it depends on
   • corrected the owner field in the Formbuilder Route 53 TXT records so external-dns pointed their A records at the new NLB
   • restored the remaining components with a targeted apply
   • ran the apply pipeline to restore all certificates, ServiceMonitors and Prometheus rules from the environment repository

   View case
3. IL-0061 A Terraform pull request merged out of order deleted a production GKE cluster, and recreating it deleted a second one

   Spotify2019

   Symptoms

   Terraform, applied from the shared cluster configuration repository after a merge, deleted Spotify's production GKE cluster in Asia. While the team tried to recreate it, Terraform deleted a second production cluster, so two of the three production clusters were gone.

   Resources deleted

   Trigger

   A feature team's pull request that added three users to an existing RBAC role binding file was merged before the cluster operators' pull request that imported the Asia cluster into Terraform state. The review build of the import pull request had already written the cluster into the shared state file, and the merged configuration had no definition of the Asia cluster, so Terraform removed it.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   TerraformCI systemGKE control plane

   Contributing factor

   No safeguard on destructive changeMissed in reviewUnverified assumption

   Detection

   Internal service discovery could not reach the deleted cluster and the cluster operator team was paged.

   Remediation

   • removed the deleted clusters from the service discovery configuration and restarted service discovery so clients fell back to the instances outside Kubernetes
   • one team that ran half on Kubernetes and half on VMs created more VMs outside Kubernetes to handle the load
   • recreated the clusters, using the hourly backups
   • updated the places where the old clusters' master IPs were hardcoded

   Action items

   • Post the Terraform dry-run output as a comment on each pull request
   • Require a status check that the branch is up to date with master, so the dry run reflects what will actually happen
   • Require an approving review on pull requests
   • Fail reviews automatically when certain keywords such as destroy appear; cluster deletions are done manually outside this repository
   • Add linters and validators for the cluster configuration
   • Schedule and announce disaster recovery tests that cover a cluster going away and smaller failures

   Lessons

   Plan for failure from the start and migrate large infrastructure gradually, so there is redundancy and a way back. A backup whose restore has never been tested is not a backup. Practising disaster recovery paid off: restoring the first deleted cluster took three and a quarter hours, and the team can now restore a larger cluster in one hour. What matters is not who made the mistake but what was learned from it.

   View case

By root cause3