Cases19 cases

9 to 13 of 19

1. IL-0139 Pods on GKE clusters with Calico network policy got stuck Terminating or Pending after upgrading to 1.22 or later because of a race condition in the Calico component

   Google Cloud2022

   Symptoms

   After upgrading to GKE 1.22 or later, clusters that use Calico network policy could have pods stuck in Terminating or Pending. Google Cloud posted the incident at 16:01 US/Pacific on 2022-09-15 as pods stuck terminating; from the 2022-09-21 update the description also named pods stuck Pending.

   Pods stuck in TerminatingPods Pending

   Trigger

   Upgrading a GKE cluster that uses Calico network policy to version 1.22 or later.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   CalicokubeletPod termination

   Contributing factor

   –

   Remediation

   • released a fix in GKE 1.24.4-gke.800 and made it available in 1.23 and 1.22
   • offered an internal patch through Google Cloud Support for affected customers
   • advised customers to restart the kubelet and calico-node to get stuck pods unstuck
   • advised customers without a strong need for Calico to disable Calico network policy

   Action items

   • Upgrade clusters on the Rapid, Regular and Stable release channels running 1.22 or 1.23 to the fixed version automatically

   Lessons

   A race in the Calico component can leave pods stuck Terminating, with FailedKillPod and KillPodSandbox errors that point at the network plugin, not at the workload. Restarting the kubelet and calico-node frees the stuck pods but does not remove the race; the fixed GKE version or Google's internal patch does. Clusters that use the cluster autoscaler are more likely to hit it.

   View case
2. IL-0205 The GKE cluster autoscaler could not add nodes to GitLab.com's production cluster because Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disks in us-east1

   GitLab2021

   Symptoms

   At 08:05 UTC on 2021-06-21 the API service's Apdex (the share of requests that finish within a target time) and Rails request queuing began trending the wrong way. At 09:01 the team found the API deployment unhealthy: it needed more pods for the day's growing traffic, but no new nodes could be added to give it pod capacity. Users saw slow responses; the review found no sign that error rates rose.

   Scale-up failureHigh latencyPods PendingDeploys failing

   Trigger

   Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disk stock in us-east1, the region GitLab.com runs in, while the API service needed more nodes for rising user traffic.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Cluster autoscalerNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotLimited debug accessOverlapping failures

   Detection

   There was no alert on resource availability. Apdex and Rails queuing began trending the wrong way at 08:05 UTC and an engineer declared the incident in Slack at 08:43; finding the cause took a lot of log digging: cluster autoscaler errors about node pools in backoff, then ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED at the instance-group level, and finally Google Cloud support naming SSD as the exhausted resource.

   Remediation

   • added a node pool that uses pd-standard disks
   • scaled the new node pool by hand across all three zones to relieve the API
   • brought more pd-standard node pools online for the other blocked workloads
   • stopped production deployments and opened a Google Cloud support case about the cluster autoscaler not working with the new node pools
   • changed node pools and nodeSelectors so the remaining workloads ran on pd-standard nodes
   • removed the SSD-backed node pools after a day without problems

   Action items

   • Move Kubernetes services to pd-standard disks (delivery#1837)
   • Capture resource exhaustion errors as a metric

   Lessons

   A cloud region can run out of one specific resource, here SSD persistent disks, and the only error may be a generic ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED that does not name it. GitLab could neither monitor nor reserve resource availability, so detection took 22 hours and the cause came from Google Cloud support. The workloads ran fine on pd-standard disks. A second problem found on the way, a cluster autoscaler that does not fall back to another matching node pool when one cannot scale, slowed the move to the new node pools.

   View case
3. IL-0015 A GKE cluster's /16 pod address range ran out at 256 nodes, leaving new pods Pending and node scale-ups failing

   loveholidays2020

   Symptoms

   A colleague wrote in Slack that his application was taking a long time to deploy. A deployment that normally finishes in minutes had been running for about an hour: about half of the new pods were running and serving traffic, and the other half were Pending.

   Pods PendingIP address exhaustionScale-up failure

   Trigger

   The cluster reaching 256 nodes, the most its /16 pod secondary range could hold at 256 addresses per node; every further node creation failed.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   VPC subnet or pod address rangeCluster autoscalerNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limit

   Detection

   A colleague reported in Slack that a deployment was slow; the pending pods' events and the cluster autoscaler status ConfigMap showed the exhausted IP space.

   Remediation

   • lowered the maximum pods per node on selected node pools, cutting IP consumption by about 30%
   • moved some node pools to larger instance types

   Action items

   • Lower the maximum pods per node on node pools that do not run many pods
   • Use larger instance types in some node pools

   Lessons

   In a VPC-native GKE cluster the number of nodes, not the number of pods, uses up the pod range: by default each node reserves 256 addresses, so even a /16 is full at 256 nodes. Maximum pods per node and node size are the practical levers; larger nodes pack better but take more pods down when they fail.

   View case
4. IL-0193 A GCP persistent disk degradation took down a Cassandra StatefulSet whose OrderedReady policy blocked recovery, and Metrictank could not reconnect to the recreated pods, causing a 23-hour Graphite query outage

   Grafana Labs2019

   Symptoms

   An alert fired because some Metrictank instances could not drain their write queue, which meant they could not write to Cassandra. Google had not yet published an incident, but a team member's Discord server, also hosted on GCP, was down, which pointed at GCP; Google confirmed an SSD persistent disk incident about 90 minutes after it began.

   High error rateNode NotReadyPods PendingService outage

   Trigger

   A Google Cloud incident in which SSD persistent disks performed so poorly that many I/O operations failed for an extended period.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Persistent volumes and stateful setsDatabaseNode root disk

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresUnpatched known bugUnverified assumption

   Detection

   An alert that Metrictank write instances could not flush their write queue to Cassandra. Error rates alone rose too slowly to notice quickly, because most queries were served from memory.

   Remediation

   • Added compute nodes hoping new nodes could attach the disks, which did not work
   • Deleted and recreated the Cassandra StatefulSet with an updated pod management policy, so all pods but one started
   • Raised Kafka topic retention to avoid data loss during the long downtime
   • Temporarily added nodes so Metrictank restarts were not slowed by CPU starvation
   • Restarted all Metrictank instances, which took more than 20 hours, so they connected to the new Cassandra IPs

   Action items

   • Re-instantiate the gocql connection in Metrictank when it is detected dead, so it reconnects even when all Cassandra IPs change
   • Fix the Metrictank write-queue deadlock by updating an internal data structure with atomics instead of a lock

   Lessons

   An OrderedReady StatefulSet cannot recover past a single pod whose volume will not attach; when every pod is down, the ordering that protects normal start-up blocks the whole cluster. A client that learns peer addresses only from live peers needs a way to go back to the service name when all peers are replaced at once. A long-tolerated bug with a config workaround can surface at the worst time; this one turned out to have a simple fix. Writing incoming data to a Kafka write-ahead log first meant all data could still be ingested after recovery, and Kafka on non-SSD disks escaped the disk incident. With both Metrictank bugs fixed, the team expects a similar event to take less than 3 hours to recover from instead of 23.

   View case
5. IL-0039 New Kubernetes worker nodes could not join any cluster because a package URL hardcoded in kops nodeup broke

   FREE NOW2019

   Symptoms

   At 16:00 CEST a developer reported in the #ask-platform Slack channel that a deployment to the Prelive cluster was failing, and a second report followed at 16:06.

   Pods PendingScale-up failure

   Trigger

   Roughly two to three days earlier, the CentOS repository mirror was restructured and container-selinux-2.68-1.el7.noarch.rpm moved, which made the static download URL hardcoded in kops nodeup invalid.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Node operating system imageNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Developers asked for help in the #ask-platform Slack channel because their deployments were failing.

   Remediation

   • downloaded the package by hand on the Prelive nodes so their bootstrap could finish
   • changed the cluster AMI from Amazon Linux 2 to Debian and applied it to all clusters

   Action items

   • Create an alert that shows when nodes cannot join the cluster, possibly from information the cluster autoscaler already has
   • Document the external dependencies of node startup and look for ways to reduce them
   • Change the AMI back to Amazon Linux 2 Minimal once kops fixes the issue
   • Document node troubleshooting better: what happens during bootstrap and where the logs are

   Lessons

   Applying cluster changes through kops and Jenkins worked well, and troubleshooting quickly showed that the failing deployments came from missing cluster capacity. What went wrong was that nobody noticed, over a long period, that some autoscaling groups held more worker instances than Kubernetes had nodes. The team was lucky that no large number of production spot instances was terminated during the problem and that it was noticed during office hours.

   View case

By root cause6