Cases8 cases

3 to 7 of 8

1. IL-0226 Azure Front Door edge servers crashed worldwide on incompatible configuration metadata, causing timeouts and DNS errors

   Microsoft Azure2025

   Symptoms

   From 15:41 UTC on 29 October 2025, customers and Microsoft services using Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN) got connection timeout errors and DNS resolution issues. Monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Intermittent timeoutsDNS resolution failuresService outageHigh latency

   Trigger

   At 15:35 UTC a specific sequence of valid customer configuration changes, made across two different AFD control plane build versions, produced incompatible customer configuration metadata that was deployed to the edge sites.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   CDN and edge networkAuthoritative DNS servers and records

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsChange with a delayed effectIneffective rollbackExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   The configuration protection system detected the data plane impact and blocked configuration changes at 15:43 UTC, and monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

   Remediation

   • The configuration protection system automatically blocked all new and in-flight configuration changes worldwide
   • Removed the problematic customer configurations from the latest LKG snapshot by hand
   • Blocked all customer configuration changes from propagating to the data plane
   • Deployed the updated LKG configuration across the global fleet
   • Moved Azure Portal away from Azure Front Door
   • Rebalanced traffic by hand to a few healthy edge sites, then switched back to automatic traffic management
   • Blocked all AFD customer configuration changes at the Azure Resource Manager level until safeguards were in place

   Action items

   • Fix the control plane incompatibility and the data plane bug
   • Process each customer configuration completely and synchronously before production stages
   • Add stages to the phased configuration rollout, with longer bake time between them
   • Move configuration processing on data plane servers into isolated worker processes
   • Reduce configuration propagation time from 45 minutes to about 15 minutes
   • Test backwards compatibility with configurations generated by earlier control plane builds
   • Move critical first-party infrastructure to an active-active setup with fail away
   • Isolate customer configuration and traffic with micro cell segmentation of the AFD data plane
   • Restore customer configurations within one hour by using the local configuration cache
   • Cut data plane recovery further, to about 10 minutes
   • Remove delays in Azure Service Health alerts by raising resource thresholds
   • Extend automated Azure Service Health alerts to similar classes of service degradation
   • Fail over support request systems faster so Premier and Unified customers can always open requests

   Lessons

   Microsoft describes configuration propagation risk as inherent to a global Content Delivery Network, in which route, WAF and origin changes must be deployed quickly worldwide. Both this incident and the 9 October AFD incident came from that risk. This time the incompatible metadata passed a protection system that advances only on healthy data plane signals, because the crash came later from delayed asynchronous processing. Some learnings and repair items from the earlier incident applied here as well. Microsoft advises customers to build a resilient global HTTP ingress layer that stays available during regional or network disruptions, to manage resources through the REST API or PowerShell when management portals are unavailable, and to configure Azure Service Health alerts so the right people hear about service issues.

   View case
2. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours

   Cloudflare2025

   Symptoms

   From 16:27 UTC on 21 August 2025, users connecting to Cloudflare from servers in AWS us-east-1, or receiving connections from Cloudflare there, saw high latency, packet loss and failures to reach origins. Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC.

   Packet lossHigh latencyIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   At about 16:27 UTC a single customer began sending many requests from AWS us-east-1 to Cloudflare for objects in Cloudflare's cache, doubling the total traffic from Cloudflare to AWS.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectBGP routingCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   No headroomHarmful manual actionExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC, and an incident was raised for customer impact at 17:45 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Rate limited the single customer whose traffic caused the surge
   • Took further traffic engineering actions that fully resolved the congestion
   • Asked AWS to revert its BGP prefix withdrawals, which AWS finished at 20:07 UTC

   Action items

   • Build a mechanism to deprioritise a customer's traffic when it congests the network enough to affect others
   • Speed up the Data Center Interconnect upgrades to add network capacity
   • Work with AWS so the two companies' BGP traffic engineering actions do not conflict
   • Build a traffic management system that gives each customer a network resource budget and automates the manual actions used here

   Lessons

   Cloudflare concludes that it must isolate customers better so that no single customer can take over shared network resources and degrade the platform for others, and that its network needs enough capacity to meet demand. It describes the outage as the result of insufficient network congestion management during an unusual high-traffic event.

   View case
3. IL-0257 canva.com went down for about 50 minutes when 1.5 million requests per second OOM-killed every API Gateway task

   Canva2024

   Symptoms

   On 12 November 2024, after a new version of Canva's editor was deployed at 8:47 AM UTC, the editor's object panel stayed in a perpetual loading state for many users, particularly in Asia. Then from 9:08 AM UTC to about 10:00 AM UTC canva.com was unavailable and all requests to it failed.

   Service outageOOMKilledHigh latencyPacket loss

   Trigger

   At 8:47 AM UTC a new version of the Canva editor page was deployed, and client devices began fetching its new static assets through Cloudflare while the network path between Cloudflare's Singapore and Ashburn locations was losing packets.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   CDN and edge networkAPI gatewayAmazon ECS

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresMonitoring blind spotRetry stormAutomation amplificationUnpatched known bug

   Remediation

   • Added a temporary Cloudflare firewall rule at 9:29 AM UTC that blocked all traffic at the CDN so new API Gateway tasks could start
   • Redirected canva.com to the status page
   • Restored traffic gradually, starting with Australian users under strict rate limits

   Action items

   • Write a runbook for rerouting, blocking and progressively restoring traffic
   • Show users a more informative error page when canva.com is unavailable
   • Raise the baseline number of API Gateway tasks and the memory of each task
   • Add load shedding rules to the API Gateway for similar traffic patterns
   • Load test the API Gateway regularly
   • Deploy the patch for the thread-locking bug in the telemetry library
   • Add multithreaded tests for the contended code path to the telemetry library microbenchmark suite
   • Use page load completion events as a second canary indicator for page asset releases
   • Experiment with adding another rollout stage to the canary to give more time to detect issues
   • Add timeouts so user requests do not wait excessively long for assets
   • Work with Cloudflare to understand the system interactions behind the incident

   View case
4. IL-0339 Azure Front Door and Azure CDN users saw intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes for hours

   Microsoft Azure2024

   Symptoms

   From 11:45 UTC on 30 July 2024, a subset of customers got intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes when connecting to Microsoft services that use Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN). The Azure Portal team saw the first service degradation at 11:47 UTC.

   Intermittent connection failuresIntermittent timeoutsHigh latencyPacket loss

   Trigger

   Around 11:45 UTC the Azure network DDoS protection service was disengaging after a routine DDoS mitigation and returning traffic to its default routing to AFD, but the routes at one site in Europe could not be updated because the network control plane could not reach that site during a local power outage.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   CDN and edge networkDDoS protection serviceNetwork control plane (SDN)Data center power and cooling

   Contributing factor

   Overlapping failuresExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The Azure Portal team detected service degradation at 11:47 UTC and began to investigate. At 12:10 UTC network monitoring correlated the Portal incident to a network issue at one site in Europe, and networking engineers joined.

   Remediation

   • Rerouted traffic under the standard congestion playbook, which removed most of the impact by 13:58 UTC
   • Ordered the network control plane to reissue its commands to the misbehaving device, which could not be reached
   • Removed the device that kept attracting traffic from the network and scanned the network for other issues

   Action items

   • Add the missing configuration on network devices so a DDoS mitigation issue in one geography cannot spread to another
   • Improve validation and monitoring in the Azure network to detect invalid configurations
   • Improve monitoring for when the DDoS protection service is unreachable from the control plane but still serving traffic

   View case
5. IL-0338 Google Cloud HTTP(S) and TCP/SSL Proxy load balancers returned 502s or reset connections on 33% to 87% of requests

   Google Cloud2018

   Symptoms

   From 12:17 to 12:49 PDT on 17 July 2018, Google Cloud HTTP(S) Load Balancers answered a share of requests with 502 return codes, and connections to TCP/SSL Proxy Load Balancers were reset. The share of failed requests moved between 33% and 87% during those 32 minutes, and automated monitoring alerted Google engineers at 12:19.

   High error rateConnection resetsHigh latency

   Trigger

   A configuration change in the production environment intermittently set off a bug in a new feature of the second-layer Google Front Ends.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Cloud load balancerCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Automated monitoring alerted Google's engineering team at 12:19 PDT, two minutes after the 502s began.

   Remediation

   • Reverted the configuration change at 12:44 PDT, which stopped the GFE restarts

   Action items

   • Add safeguards that disable features not yet in service
   • Harden the GFE testing stack against latent bugs in production binaries that make a task restart
   • Isolate the shards of GFE pools further from each other to reduce the scope of failures
   • Build a consolidated dashboard of all configuration changes for GFE pools

   View case

By root cause4