Cases6 cases

3 to 6 of 6

1. IL-0277 Patching Elastic Cloud's ZooKeeper ensemble in us-east-1 lost quorum, and hosted clusters and Kibana went unreachable

   Elastic2019

   Symptoms

   On 4 February 2019 at about 02:50 UTC, Elastic Cloud customers with deployments in AWS us-east-1 lost stable access to their Elasticsearch clusters, and an increase in HTTP 5xx errors showed on the load balancer. Deployments were partially or completely unavailable until 09:28 UTC, Kibana access was disrupted for most customers in the region, and the Elastic Cloud User Console timed out when customers tried to view their deployments.

   High error rateService outageIntermittent timeoutsNode kernel panic

   Trigger

   A routine patching procedure in AWS us-east-1 replaced the first and second members of the three-node ZooKeeper ensemble with patched hosts between 02:25 and 02:45 UTC, following the same documented process used in the other 12 regions.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Coordination and key-value storeContainer runtimeLinux kernelElasticsearch or OpenSearchconntrack table

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotRetry stormHealth check tied to a dependencyOverlapping failuresHarmful manual action

   Detection

   An increase in HTTP 5xx errors on the load balancer was identified at 02:50 UTC, the time the ZooKeeper ensemble lost its leader.

   Remediation

   • Restarted internal services in sweeping restarts at 03:22 and 06:00 to reduce client connection problems
   • Isolated the ZooKeeper ensemble by cutting off client connections
   • Rolled back the remaining ensemble member after its host became unstable
   • Rolled back the second ensemble member after its host became unstable
   • Rebooted the ZooKeeper hosts made unresponsive by the runc CPU softlocks
   • Re-established ZooKeeper quorum by removing client load and operator debugging, then reintroduced client load gradually
   • Increased the initLimit setting of the ZooKeeper observer layer used by the proxies
   • Scaled the proxy fleet up and out to handle the increased traffic
   • Applied a runbook that restarted the internal proxying containers and Kibana instances and set sysctl limits

   Action items

   • Reduce the dataset size carried by the ZooKeeper ensembles by over 60%
   • Reduce the number of health checks and intervals needed before a healthy proxy node joins the load balancing layer
   • Stop counting ZooKeeper connectivity in the proxy health checks once a proxy has its configuration and routes
   • Canary the rewritten proxy v2 architecture, which decouples the proxy service from ZooKeeper state, in production regions
   • Improve visibility into ZooKeeper with better logging and metrics for the ZooKeeper processes, the JVM and the container and host systems
   • Make Kibana route discovery more resilient
   • Fix the Kibana issues that amplify internal HTTP requests during availability events
   • Fix the Kibana issues that leak connections
   • Make internal monitoring agents use backoff with jitter
   • Formalize a maintenance matrix with set timeframes per region, so failures of critical services fall in non-critical times
   • Give runbooks for coordination layer maintenance a better decision criteria matrix
   • Set up a feedback loop with support leadership for incident communications through support and the status page

   Lessons

   Service metrics that reported the ZooKeeper hosts healthy were not enough to show the state of individual hosts or of the ensemble, so they gave a false signal that maintenance could continue. Because the platform depended on the coordination layer, losing its quorum caused a major service disruption in which every Elasticsearch cluster in the region saw some failures, and fixes that worked one by one fell short at the scale of the failure.

   View case
2. IL-0588 AppOptics metrics APIs returned 5xx as Kafka partitions stayed leaderless after an AWS power event hit their ZooKeeper

   AppOptics2018

   Symptoms

   On May 31, 2018 from 21:53 UTC the metrics APIs of AppOptics and Librato returned a 5xx for a majority of incoming metric data. APM metrics and traces sent from AppOptics APM were affected, and many alert notifications were delayed.

   High error rateFailover failureMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   A power event in one of AWS's availability zones in us-east-1 cut off nodes in several critical parts of the AppOptics and Librato infrastructure, including the ZooKeeper node that was then the leader of the ensemble coordinating the Kafka brokers.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Message brokerCoordination and key-value store

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot

   Remediation

   • Restarted one ZooKeeper node by hand to force a leader election, after which the ensemble regained quorum
   • Restarted every Kafka broker in a rolling restart until all partitions were back online
   • Worked through the backlog, including the backlog of alerts, and resumed normal operations

   Action items

   • Isolate the Kafka clusters better across availability zones and regions
   • Stop sharing one ZooKeeper ensemble across Kafka clusters
   • Run game days on this failure and check whether newer Kafka versions fix it
   • Put in place more checks that notify the team earlier about subsystems that need extra help to recover

   Lessons

   Running services across several availability zones and more than one Kafka cluster did not isolate the pipeline from the failure of one zone, because partitions of different clusters sat in the same zones and the clusters shared one ZooKeeper ensemble. More operational monitoring of the subsystems that needed help to recover would have led to a faster recovery.

   View case
3. IL-0536 Amazon SimpleDB in US East returned HTTP 500 to nearly all API calls for two hours after its nodes left the cluster

   Amazon Web Services2014

   Symptoms

   From 9:16 PM to 11:16 PM PDT on June 13, Amazon SimpleDB in the US East Region was unavailable to all API calls except a fraction of eventually consistent reads, and SimpleDB API requests returned server-side errors (http response code 500).

   Service outageHigh error rate

   Trigger

   Power was lost to the servers that hosted several SimpleDB storage nodes in a single data center, and those storage nodes became unavailable at the same time.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   DatabaseCoordination and key-value storeData center power and cooling

   Contributing factor

   Automation amplification

   Remediation

   • Raised the lock service handshake timeout values by hand
   • Restarted a subset of metadata nodes, which could then authorize the storage nodes to rejoin the cluster
   • Throttled CreateDomain and DeleteDomain calls until 1:30 AM while the remaining metadata nodes recovered

   Action items

   • Set a longer lock service handshake timeout in all SimpleDB Regions
   • Make nodes wait and retry handshakes later with a longer timeout instead of removing themselves from the cluster after repeated timeouts

   Lessons

   The short handshake timeout had been chosen to detect replica failures quickly, and AWS concluded it was too low. Nodes removing themselves from the cluster right after several handshake timeouts widened the event and caused the API errors; the nodes should have waited and retried with a longer timeout.

   View case
4. IL-0362 PagerDuty could not dispatch notifications for 18 minutes when a peering point shared by two AWS regions degraded

   PagerDuty2013sev1

   Symptoms

   On Saturday 13 April 2013 at 8:11am Pacific Time, PagerDuty's on-call engineer was paged about one node of the notification dispatch system, and an attempt at 8:13 to bring the node back failed. Customers saw delayed notifications and 500 errors on PagerDuty's API endpoints.

   High latencyHigh error rateIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   At 7:57am Pacific Time, according to AWS, a peering point in Northern California began to degrade, causing connectivity problems for the two AWS regions that PagerDuty used as two of its three datacenters.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Transit gateway or network interconnectCoordination and key-value store

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failureUnverified assumptionMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   The PagerDuty on-call engineer was paged at 8:11am about an issue with one node of the notification dispatch system, and at 8:18 monitoring detected multiple-provider failures for notifications.

   Remediation

   • Restarted most of the failed coordinator processes by hand
   • The notification dispatch system reached quorum again and processed all queued notifications

   Action items

   • Add more logging and aggregate logs into a single searchable source
   • Add a process watcher that restarts failed coordinator processes automatically
   • Build a dashboard that shows inter-host connectivity
   • Train engineering staff on Cassandra and ZooKeeper
   • Investigate moving off one of the AWS regions to a new hosting provider and datacenter that avoids a single point of failure

   Lessons

   Datacenters chosen to be independent and physically separate can still share a network peering point, and a design built to survive the loss of one datacenter did not survive losing two at once.

   View case

By root cause3