Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeCapacity exhaustionComponentPrometheusClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases6 cases

3 to 6 of 6

  1. Symptoms

    At 14:05 on 25 July 2023, a high-priority PagerDuty alert from Pingdom reported that the "Prometheus - live healthcheck" was DOWN. Prometheus on the live cluster was unavailable, and the Cloud Platform lost its monitoring for a while.

    Trigger

    The growing number of namespaces and Prometheus rules raised Prometheus' memory needs beyond what its node instance size could hold.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A Pingdom health check on Prometheus failed and raised a high-priority PagerDuty alert.

    Remediation
    • drained the monitoring node, moving Prometheus to another monitoring node
    • changed the node instance size to r6i.4xlarge
    • raised the Prometheus memory limit to 100Gi
    • set the Prometheus container limits to 12 CPU cores and 110Gi of memory
    Action items
    • Add an alert on node memory usage and on a pod using up most of a node's memory (issue #4538)
  2. Symptoms

    Request latency from the Temporal Server History service, the service that starts workflow executions and records their progress, was higher and less steady than it should be on a self-hosted Kubernetes deployment. The CPU dashboard showed the history pods using less than 60 percent of their CPU, yet the same pods were being throttled.

    Trigger

    Normal load on History pods that had a CPU limit of 2 cores on 8-core nodes, with the Go runtime's GOMAXPROCS left at its default of one per node core.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A Prometheus query for CPU throttling showed the history pods throttled although their CPU usage read under 60 percent.

    Remediation
    • set the GOMAXPROCS environment variable to 2 to match the 2-core CPU limit
    Action items
    • Set GOMAXPROCS automatically from the Kubernetes CPU limit, from Temporal release 1.21.0
    Lessons

    A CPU usage graph averaged over 15 seconds or more can sit far below 100 percent while a container is being throttled, so throttling needs its own metric. A Go program in a container should have GOMAXPROCS matched to its CPU limit, or to its CPU request when it has no limit. The author recommends not using CPU limits at all.

  3. Symptoms

    The hub pod of the prod JupyterHub on the leap cluster (leap.2i2c.org) restarted unexpectedly during a large node scale-up, and a user opened a support ticket. The ingress-nginx and proxy pods kept running.

    Trigger

    A user's dask-gateway workload added about 100 dask-worker nodes within a minute, and Prometheus started scraping the metrics exporters on about 200 nodes.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    A user support ticket (2i2c Freshdesk ticket 414) about the leap hub; the engineer then looked at Grafana and the cluster's nodes and events.

    Action items
    • Configure CPU and memory requests for the hub and proxy pods (#2127; at least 100m CPU was proposed)
    • Make the Grafana OOMKiller dashboard work (#2213)
    • Move LEAP cloud infrastructure to shared nodes (#2209)
    • Update resource requests and limits, mainly for ingress-nginx and Prometheus (#2324)
    • Decide whether Prometheus should scrape dask worker pods (#2366)
    Lessons

    Prometheus load grows with the number of nodes, so a burst of autoscaled nodes can push a nearly full core node over the edge and evict the pods that matter most. Core pods that request 10m of CPU get a tenth of the CPU share of busy neighbours that request 100m. Kubernetes events expire after an hour, so evidence of OOM kills needs a dashboard that keeps it.

  4. Symptoms

    One Monday morning the author opened the Prometheus dashboard to check a Kubernetes cluster for alerts and could not reach it. The Prometheus pod was in CrashLoopBackOff: kubectl get pods showed it 1/2 ready with 950 restarts over 3d20h on worker3.

    Trigger

    After start, the Prometheus time series count rose to 2,162,256 within five minutes and its memory use filled the 8GB host.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The author found it on a Monday morning when the Prometheus dashboard, opened to check the cluster for alerts, could not be reached.

    Remediation
    • removed most of the unnecessary settings from the Prometheus ConfigMap, after which the container stopped crashing
    Action items
    • Set appropriate resource requests and limits on the Prometheus pod
    • Reduce unneeded metrics by adjusting scrape targets or scrape interval
    • Estimate Prometheus memory needs, provide dedicated hosts with a node label such as deploy-topology: Prometheus, and pin the Prometheus pod to them with a nodeSelector
    Lessons

    Exit code 137 together with an OOM event in the kubelet log means the kernel killed the container, not kubelet. Under node memory pressure the kernel kills the process with the highest score, and kubelet derives each container's oom_score_adj from the pod's QoS class: a container without a memory request in a pod where another container has one ends up Burstable with a score near 1000, so it is killed first. In a large cluster, Prometheus memory needs to be estimated from the expected series count and requested explicitly.

Check your cluster for this

These 6 cases involve Prometheus and Container memory limit. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1