Cases9 cases

4 to 8 of 9

1. IL-0147 AKS nodes behind an HTTP proxy failed to provision with CSE exit code 31 on 202508 node images, because a refactoring stopped the proxy from being used when downloading uncached Kubernetes binaries

   Microsoft2025

   Symptoms

   Creating or scaling a node pool on AKS 1.31.8 failed: the VMSS instances never finished provisioning. This started after planned maintenance moved the node image from 202507.* to 202508.*, in a cluster where nodes must send all outbound traffic through an internal HTTP/HTTPS proxy and direct egress is blocked. It happened with both Ubuntu and AzureLinux images.

   Scale-up failureUpgrade stall

   Trigger

   A node image auto-upgrade from 202507.* to 202508.* during planned maintenance, on clusters whose Kubernetes patch version was not pre-cached in the new image.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Node operating system imageNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Cache-masked failureAutomation amplification

   Detection

   The customer saw VMSS instance provisioning fail with a vmssCSE error in the VMSS activity logs and reported it as a GitHub issue.

   Remediation

   • The customer pinned the node image to a 202507.* snapshot on clusters running 1.31.8
   • The customer upgraded clusters to AKS 1.31.9 or 1.31.10, whose binaries are cached in the 202508.* images
   • The AKS team hot-patched VHD 20250811 so the proxy configuration is used for uncached binary downloads and made it globally available in public regions on 2025-09-04; it also announced the hotfix for VHD 20250820
   • The AKS team told users to reimage their nodes with az aks nodepool upgrade --node-image-only to pick up the hotfixed image

   Action items

   • Apply the proxy fix in all future VHDs

   Lessons

   A bootstrap path that runs only when an artefact is missing from a cache is easy to break without noticing: here only clusters on Kubernetes versions not pre-cached in the node image ever downloaded binaries, so only they met the proxy regression. Testing node provisioning behind a mandatory egress proxy, on older patch versions as well as the newest, would exercise that path. For clusters with restricted egress, pinning the node image or moving to a Kubernetes version cached in the image were both quick workarounds while the fix was shipped.

   View case
2. IL-0096 A GKE node pool pinned to the europe-west2-b zone could not scale for 6.5 hours because Google ran out of resources in that zone (ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED)

   2i2c2022

   Symptoms

   A user of the LIS JupyterHub reported a "backoff after failed scale-up" error, and user servers would not start. An engineer opened incident #36, "LIS hub cannot scale", at 5:40 AM Pacific on 14 November 2022.

   Scale-up failurePods PendingService outage

   Trigger

   At 10 AM UK time on 14 November 2022, the B zone of Google Cloud's europe-west2 region (London) ran out of resources to allocate. The LIS cluster's nodes were restricted to that zone.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Node poolCluster autoscaler

   Contributing factor

   Single point of failurePages not delivered

   Detection

   A user reported the "backoff after failed scale-up" error; an engineer opened the incident at 5:40 AM Pacific, about three hours and forty minutes after the zone ran out of resources.

   Remediation

   • edited the node pool in the GCP console to allow node creation in the A and C zones of europe-west2, which were not exhausted

   Action items

   • Either restrict the node pool back to the B zone after the Black Friday event, or move the cluster and the NFS Filestore to the A zone (infrastructure issue #1944)
   • Investigate an enterprise plan that allows a regional NFS, at higher cost (infrastructure issue #1945)
   • Make sure PagerDuty notifications always get through to engineers (team-compass issue #574)

   Lessons

   A node pool pinned to one zone for storage performance cannot scale when the cloud provider runs out of capacity in that zone. The autoscaler's "backoff after failed scale-up" message usually points to quotas, and raising quotas does nothing here; the ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED error in the logs is what identifies a zone without capacity. The review found that one engineer wearing many hats (incident commander, comms and debugging), with pages not reaching the other responders, made the response harder; a team response would have given more support.

   View case
3. IL-0205 The GKE cluster autoscaler could not add nodes to GitLab.com's production cluster because Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disks in us-east1

   GitLab2021

   Symptoms

   At 08:05 UTC on 2021-06-21 the API service's Apdex (the share of requests that finish within a target time) and Rails request queuing began trending the wrong way. At 09:01 the team found the API deployment unhealthy: it needed more pods for the day's growing traffic, but no new nodes could be added to give it pod capacity. Users saw slow responses; the review found no sign that error rates rose.

   Scale-up failureHigh latencyPods PendingDeploys failing

   Trigger

   Google Cloud ran out of SSD persistent disk stock in us-east1, the region GitLab.com runs in, while the API service needed more nodes for rising user traffic.

   Root cause

   Cloud provider outage

   Component

   Cluster autoscalerNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotLimited debug accessOverlapping failures

   Detection

   There was no alert on resource availability. Apdex and Rails queuing began trending the wrong way at 08:05 UTC and an engineer declared the incident in Slack at 08:43; finding the cause took a lot of log digging: cluster autoscaler errors about node pools in backoff, then ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED at the instance-group level, and finally Google Cloud support naming SSD as the exhausted resource.

   Remediation

   • added a node pool that uses pd-standard disks
   • scaled the new node pool by hand across all three zones to relieve the API
   • brought more pd-standard node pools online for the other blocked workloads
   • stopped production deployments and opened a Google Cloud support case about the cluster autoscaler not working with the new node pools
   • changed node pools and nodeSelectors so the remaining workloads ran on pd-standard nodes
   • removed the SSD-backed node pools after a day without problems

   Action items

   • Move Kubernetes services to pd-standard disks (delivery#1837)
   • Capture resource exhaustion errors as a metric

   Lessons

   A cloud region can run out of one specific resource, here SSD persistent disks, and the only error may be a generic ZONE_RESOURCE_POOL_EXHAUSTED that does not name it. GitLab could neither monitor nor reserve resource availability, so detection took 22 hours and the cause came from Google Cloud support. The workloads ran fine on pd-standard disks. A second problem found on the way, a cluster autoscaler that does not fall back to another matching node pool when one cannot scale, slowed the move to the new node pools.

   View case
4. IL-0015 A GKE cluster's /16 pod address range ran out at 256 nodes, leaving new pods Pending and node scale-ups failing

   loveholidays2020

   Symptoms

   A colleague wrote in Slack that his application was taking a long time to deploy. A deployment that normally finishes in minutes had been running for about an hour: about half of the new pods were running and serving traffic, and the other half were Pending.

   Pods PendingIP address exhaustionScale-up failure

   Trigger

   The cluster reaching 256 nodes, the most its /16 pod secondary range could hold at 256 addresses per node; every further node creation failed.

   Root cause

   Capacity exhaustion

   Component

   VPC subnet or pod address rangeCluster autoscalerNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnknown limit

   Detection

   A colleague reported in Slack that a deployment was slow; the pending pods' events and the cluster autoscaler status ConfigMap showed the exhausted IP space.

   Remediation

   • lowered the maximum pods per node on selected node pools, cutting IP consumption by about 30%
   • moved some node pools to larger instance types

   Action items

   • Lower the maximum pods per node on node pools that do not run many pods
   • Use larger instance types in some node pools

   Lessons

   In a VPC-native GKE cluster the number of nodes, not the number of pods, uses up the pod range: by default each node reserves 256 addresses, so even a /16 is full at 256 nodes. Maximum pods per node and node size are the practical levers; larger nodes pack better but take more pods down when they fail.

   View case
5. IL-0039 New Kubernetes worker nodes could not join any cluster because a package URL hardcoded in kops nodeup broke

   FREE NOW2019

   Symptoms

   At 16:00 CEST a developer reported in the #ask-platform Slack channel that a deployment to the Prelive cluster was failing, and a second report followed at 16:06.

   Pods PendingScale-up failure

   Trigger

   Roughly two to three days earlier, the CentOS repository mirror was restructured and container-selinux-2.68-1.el7.noarch.rpm moved, which made the static download URL hardcoded in kops nodeup invalid.

   Root cause

   Dependency failure

   Component

   Node operating system imageNode pool

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Developers asked for help in the #ask-platform Slack channel because their deployments were failing.

   Remediation

   • downloaded the package by hand on the Prelive nodes so their bootstrap could finish
   • changed the cluster AMI from Amazon Linux 2 to Debian and applied it to all clusters

   Action items

   • Create an alert that shows when nodes cannot join the cluster, possibly from information the cluster autoscaler already has
   • Document the external dependencies of node startup and look for ways to reduce them
   • Change the AMI back to Amazon Linux 2 Minimal once kops fixes the issue
   • Document node troubleshooting better: what happens during bootstrap and where the logs are

   Lessons

   Applying cluster changes through kops and Jenkins worked well, and troubleshooting quickly showed that the failing deployments came from missing cluster capacity. What went wrong was that nobody noticed, over a long period, that some autoscaling groups held more worker instances than Kubernetes had nodes. The team was lucky that no large number of production spot instances was terminated during the problem and that it was noticed during office hours.

   View case

By root cause7