Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeConfiguration changeComponentBGP routingSymptomHigh latencyClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    On 22 January 2026 from 20:25 UTC, a Cloudflare edge router in Miami sent unintended BGP advertisements of IPv6 prefixes to its transit providers and peers. External networks' traffic was funnelled into the Miami data center, the backbone between Miami and Atlanta became congested, and some Cloudflare customer traffic saw elevated loss and higher latency.

    Trigger

    At 20:25 UTC Cloudflare's policy automation pushed a change, merged at 19:52 UTC, that removed the BGP announcements from Miami for a data center in Bogotá, Colombia, by deleting the prefix-list 6-BOG04-SITE-LOCAL from several export policy terms.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The network team began investigating unintended route advertisements from Miami at 20:40 UTC, and an incident was raised at 20:44 UTC.

    Remediation
    • A network operator reverted the bad configuration change on the Miami router by hand
    • Paused the automation for the router so it could not run again
    • Reverted the triggering change in the network automation code repository
    • Unpaused the automation on the Miami router after confirming it ran without the routing policy bug
    Action items
    • Patch the failure in the routing policy automation that caused the leak
    • Add BGP community-based safeguards that reject routes received from providers and peers on external export policies
    • Add automatic routing policy evaluation to the CI/CD pipelines that looks for empty or erroneous policy terms
    • Detect problems in network configurations and the effects of automated changes earlier
    • Validate routing equipment vendors' implementations of RFC9234 before rolling out BGP roles and the Only-to-Customer Attribute
    • Encourage long-term adoption of RPKI Autonomous System Provider Authorization (ASPA)
    Lessons

    Removing only the prefix lists from export policy terms left terms that were too permissive, because a match on route-type internal accepts IBGP routes as well. Cloudflare states that route leaks are easy to cause by accident and that RFC9234 is the only way, independent of routing policy, to prevent route leaks caused at the local AS.

  2. Symptoms

    From 07:08 UTC on 25 January 2023, customers saw long network latency and timeouts when connecting to resources in Azure regions and to other Microsoft services such as Microsoft 365 and Power Platform. Microsoft's monitoring detected DNS and WAN issues from 07:11 UTC.

    Trigger

    A network engineer adding capacity to the global WAN in Madrid ran a step of a recently changed standard operating procedure that purged the IGP database; on the router manufacturer involved, that command runs on all IGP-joined routers instead of only the local one.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Monitoring detected DNS and WAN issues from 07:11 UTC and alerted the on-call engineers within 5 minutes of the command being run. The team reviewed all recent changes and identified the command by 08:20 UTC. The engineer making the change was not informed of the alerts because of the unqualified changes to the SOP.

    Remediation
    • Restarted by hand the paused WAN health and traffic engineering systems, which ended the remaining packet loss
    Action items
    • Audit and block similar widespread-impact commands across all three vendors for all WAN router roles
    • Give on-call engineers real-time visibility of approved and unqualified activity on network devices
    • Run regular mandatory operational training and attestation of following all SOPs
    • Have the Change Advisory Board review all SOPs still pending qualification within 30 days
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Backbone network (WAN) and BGP routing. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1