Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentCDN and edge networkSymptomPacket lossFactorExcessive blast radiusClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours
    Cloudflare2025
    Symptoms

    From 16:27 UTC on 21 August 2025, users connecting to Cloudflare from servers in AWS us-east-1, or receiving connections from Cloudflare there, saw high latency, packet loss and failures to reach origins. Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC.

    Packet lossHigh latencyIntermittent timeouts
    Trigger

    At about 16:27 UTC a single customer began sending many requests from AWS us-east-1 to Cloudflare for objects in Cloudflare's cache, doubling the total traffic from Cloudflare to AWS.

    Root cause
    Capacity exhaustion
    Component
    Transit gateway or network interconnectBGP routingCDN and edge network
    Contributing factor
    No headroomHarmful manual actionExcessive blast radius
    Detection

    Cloudflare's network team was alerted to internal congestion in Ashburn (IAD) at 16:44 UTC, and an incident was raised for customer impact at 17:45 UTC.

    Remediation
    • Rate limited the single customer whose traffic caused the surge
    • Took further traffic engineering actions that fully resolved the congestion
    • Asked AWS to revert its BGP prefix withdrawals, which AWS finished at 20:07 UTC
    Action items
    • Build a mechanism to deprioritise a customer's traffic when it congests the network enough to affect others
    • Speed up the Data Center Interconnect upgrades to add network capacity
    • Work with AWS so the two companies' BGP traffic engineering actions do not conflict
    • Build a traffic management system that gives each customer a network resource budget and automates the manual actions used here
    Lessons

    Cloudflare concludes that it must isolate customers better so that no single customer can take over shared network resources and degrade the platform for others, and that its network needs enough capacity to meet demand. It describes the outage as the result of insufficient network congestion management during an unusual high-traffic event.

    View case
  2. IL-0339 Azure Front Door and Azure CDN users saw intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes for hours
    Microsoft Azure2024
    Symptoms

    From 11:45 UTC on 30 July 2024, a subset of customers got intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes when connecting to Microsoft services that use Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN). The Azure Portal team saw the first service degradation at 11:47 UTC.

    Intermittent connection failuresIntermittent timeoutsHigh latencyPacket loss
    Trigger

    Around 11:45 UTC the Azure network DDoS protection service was disengaging after a routine DDoS mitigation and returning traffic to its default routing to AFD, but the routes at one site in Europe could not be updated because the network control plane could not reach that site during a local power outage.

    Root cause
    Configuration change
    Component
    CDN and edge networkDDoS protection serviceNetwork control plane (SDN)Data center power and cooling
    Contributing factor
    Overlapping failuresExcessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spot
    Detection

    The Azure Portal team detected service degradation at 11:47 UTC and began to investigate. At 12:10 UTC network monitoring correlated the Portal incident to a network issue at one site in Europe, and networking engineers joined.

    Remediation
    • Rerouted traffic under the standard congestion playbook, which removed most of the impact by 13:58 UTC
    • Ordered the network control plane to reissue its commands to the misbehaving device, which could not be reached
    • Removed the device that kept attracting traffic from the network and scanned the network for other issues
    Action items
    • Add the missing configuration on network devices so a DDoS mitigation issue in one geography cannot spread to another
    • Improve validation and monitoring in the Azure network to detect invalid configurations
    • Improve monitoring for when the DDoS protection service is unreachable from the control plane but still serving traffic
    View case
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve CDN and edge network and BGP routing. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

Open kubegap

By root cause2

Capacity exhaustion1 case

Component
BGP routingCDN and edge networkTransit gateway or network interconnect
Contributing factor
Excessive blast radiusHarmful manual actionNo headroom
Organisation
Cloudflare
  1. IL-0341 Traffic between Cloudflare and AWS us-east-1 had high latency, packet loss and origin failures for almost four hours
    Cloudflare2025

Configuration change1 case

Component
CDN and edge networkData center power and coolingDDoS protection serviceNetwork control plane (SDN)
Contributing factor
Excessive blast radiusMonitoring blind spotOverlapping failures
Organisation
Microsoft Azure
  1. IL-0339 Azure Front Door and Azure CDN users saw intermittent connection errors, timeouts and latency spikes for hours
    Microsoft Azure2024