Cases5 cases

1 to 5 of 5

1. IL-0529 New Google Cloud VMs and other instances came up without network connectivity in all zones after VPC controllers stopped

   Google Cloud2024

   Symptoms

   From 15:22 US/Pacific on 16 May 2024, new VMs and other new instances across Google Cloud came up without network programming, so the new instances could not open network connections, and VMs that were migrated or restarted lost connectivity. Changes to virtual network configuration, such as firewall rules and load balancers, were not applied. Internal monitoring alerted Google engineers at 15:41.

   Network unreachablePacket lossCluster or node provisioning stallScale-up failureHigh error rate

   Trigger

   Google's infrastructure team ran a routine maintenance action meant to shut down one unused VPC Controller in a single Google Cloud zone, and the automation shut down VPC controllers in all zones where the controllers were still in use.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)Cloud load balancerNAT gateway

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectIgnored early signalNo safeguard on destructive changeExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Internal monitoring alerts reached Google engineers at 15:41 US/Pacific, and the investigation started immediately.

   Remediation

   • Paused maintenance operations to prevent the shutdown from repeating
   • Brought the affected VPC Controllers back into a serving state in every zone
   • Stopped the automation responsible for the shutdown until safeguards are in place
   • Recovered partial Apigee proxy deployments by hand
   • Cleaned up VMs left behind by failed Dataproc cluster deletions

   Action items

   • Add safety measures that check that maintenance operations carry correctly scoped zone information
   • Make the underlying tools reject maintenance operations that do not specify zones
   • Tighten on-demand access control so one maintenance invocation cannot work across multiple zones
   • Add safety checks, testing and validation for maintenance operations, including positive and negative test cases for the new safety measures

   View case
2. IL-0530 Virtual router controllers in us-central1 ran out of memory in a loop, cutting networking for new and migrated VMs

   Google Cloud2023

   Symptoms

   On 5 October 2023 in us-central1, newly created VMs waited a long time before their networking worked, and VMs that had been live migrated lost connectivity for a long time after the migration. Networking telemetry showed cross-region packet loss to and from us-central1 from 03:08 US/Pacific. Health check state of VMs reached load balancers late.

   Packet lossNetwork unreachableOOMKilledStale endpoint routingCluster or node provisioning stall

   Trigger

   A management plane behaviour change, meant to decouple the processing of API updates to Instance Groups and Network Endpoint Groups used as load balancer backends, was deployed in us-central1 after rolling out to several other regions without incident.

   Root cause

   Faulty deployment

   Component

   Network control plane (SDN)Cloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo alert on limit

   Detection

   Engineers were alerted to slowness in the virtual network control plane in us-central1 at 21:45 US/Pacific on 4 October, before the packet loss started, and to controller failures from memory exhaustion at 02:11 on 5 October. Networking telemetry showed cross-region packet loss from 03:08.

   Remediation

   • Increased the memory allocated to the virtual network router controllers
   • Rolled back the management plane change in us-central1
   • Restarted by hand the routers that were still not accepting updates

   Action items

   • Alert proactively on memory risks and unexpected memory increases
   • Refactor the deployment configuration so engineers can reallocate memory much faster
   • Re-evaluate existing practices and add safety mechanisms for API reconciliation
   • Make management plane changes more visible across teams so the changes can be correlated faster
   • Adjust the deployment footprint so a regional API change is less likely to exhaust memory across the region at once
   • Optimise memory use in the traffic routers and their controllers

   View case
3. IL-0243 Google's global External Proxy Load Balancing returned 404 errors for most HTTP/S endpoints for 33 minutes

   Google Cloud2021

   Symptoms

   From 09:35 to 10:08 PT on 16 November 2021, most endpoints served by Google's global External Proxy Load Balancing (GCLB) returned Google 404 errors to HTTP/S requests. For about another 1 hour and 20 minutes customers could not change their load balancing configuration.

   Service outageHigh error rate

   Trigger

   On 16 November 2021 a race condition in the configuration pipeline occurred in a cluster that patch A had not yet reached, and pushed a corrupted configuration file to GCLB.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Cloud load balancerServerless function platform

   Contributing factor

   Unpatched known bugExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Automated alerting notified Google engineers at 09:50 PT, at the same time as customer support requests came in.

   Remediation

   • Rolled back to the last known good configuration, which ended the 404 errors
   • Suspended customer-initiated configuration changes in GCLB
   • Validated the fix and added proctoring and monitoring before resuming changes
   • Resumed customer configuration pushes at 11:28 PT

   Action items

   • Add alerting that reports similar issues much faster
   • Add stronger automated correctness checks on configurations before they are applied
   • Speed up planned architectural changes that improve how such issues are isolated and resolved

   View case
4. IL-0338 Google Cloud HTTP(S) and TCP/SSL Proxy load balancers returned 502s or reset connections on 33% to 87% of requests

   Google Cloud2018

   Symptoms

   From 12:17 to 12:49 PDT on 17 July 2018, Google Cloud HTTP(S) Load Balancers answered a share of requests with 502 return codes, and connections to TCP/SSL Proxy Load Balancers were reset. The share of failed requests moved between 33% and 87% during those 32 minutes, and automated monitoring alerted Google engineers at 12:19.

   High error rateConnection resetsHigh latency

   Trigger

   A configuration change in the production environment intermittently set off a bug in a new feature of the second-layer Google Front Ends.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Cloud load balancerCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   Gap in automated testsExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Automated monitoring alerted Google's engineering team at 12:19 PDT, two minutes after the 502s began.

   Remediation

   • Reverted the configuration change at 12:44 PDT, which stopped the GFE restarts

   Action items

   • Add safeguards that disable features not yet in service
   • Harden the GFE testing stack against latent bugs in production binaries that make a task restart
   • Isolate the shards of GFE pools further from each other to reduce the scope of failures
   • Build a consolidated dashboard of all configuration changes for GFE pools

   View case
5. IL-0396 New or live-migrated GCE instances, VPN tunnels and network load balancers were unreachable on public IPs for over 2h

   Google Cloud2017

   Symptoms

   On 30 January 2017, Google Compute Engine instances, Cloud VPN tunnels and GCE network load balancers that were created or live migrated between 10:36 and 12:42 PDT could not be reached on their public IP addresses. Resources created earlier, and instances that were not live migrated, kept working.

   Network unreachableProbe failures

   Trigger

   A large set of updates was applied to a rarely used load balancing configuration on the shared layer 2 load balancers.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Cloud load balancerNetwork control plane (SDN)

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusGap in automated tests

   Remediation

   • Restarted the jobs that program changes into the network load balancers, so the stuck changes were processed as a batch
   • Applied the fix zone by zone between 11:36 and 12:42

   Action items

   • Increase the canary timeout so updates that hit the inefficient code path only slow network changes instead of stopping them
   • Improve the inefficient code path
   • Write new tests that check behaviour on a wider range of configurations
   • Accelerate replacing global propagation of address configuration with decentralized routing
   • Add metrics and alerting that identify this kind of issue sooner

   View case

By root cause2