Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentDatabaseFactorChange with a delayed effectOrganisationCircleCIClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    At about 23:00 UTC on 21 January 2025, an automated alert reported that the CircleCI database instance holding archived data was almost out of free storage space. From 23:50 UTC customers saw slow starts and cancellations of workflows and jobs, and delays and difficulty viewing workflows in the CircleCI UI, although pipelines for a specific project could still be viewed.

    Trigger

    A code change to a function in the archival database on 16 January 2025 unintentionally made it write an excessive number of log messages, and the database filled its storage.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    An automated alert at about 23:00 UTC warned that the archival database was almost out of free storage, before customers were affected. The growing workflows queue was not linked to it at first because a separate alert about request volume fired at about the same time.

    Remediation
    • Scaled up the event consumer that processes the workflows queue at 23:44 UTC
    • Promoted a read replica of the archival database to a standalone primary at 23:55 UTC
    Action items
    • Fix the database function so it no longer writes an excessive number of log messages
    • Add a max duration to the workflows retry policy for archiving so it fails earlier than the default timeout
    • Move workflow archival to an event-based model that decouples it from the workflows service
    • Add forecast and anomaly monitoring for databases that alerts on unusual activity before it reaches critical levels
    Lessons

    The storage alert on the archival database did fire, but the database filled much faster than forecast, so there was little time to act before customers were affected. Because the workflows service called the archival service synchronously, a problem in the archival database slowed the whole workflows service.

  2. Symptoms

    From 13:30 UTC on 21 May 2021, CircleCI jobs on Docker, the Machine executor (including Windows, Mac, Arm and GPU) and remote Docker were delayed or blocked. Engineers had been paged at 13:00 for excessive delays in starting jobs, and the alerts showed CircleCI could not provision some types and classes of VM because it was hitting its CPU quotas in GCP.

    Trigger

    The upgrade of the RabbitMQ cluster from 3.8.9 to 3.8.16 on 20 May 2021, which brought in a 15 minute consumer acknowledgement timeout for all queue types.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Engineers were paged at 13:00 UTC on 21 May for excessive delays in starting jobs. Earlier, a 02:31 notification that a VM destroyer queue had no consumers was handled by restarting pods, and a 10:11 alert that a VM destroy queue was backing up notified once at its threshold and did not page.

    Remediation
    • Blocked Linux machine jobs from entering the work queue
    • Had GCP raise the CPU quotas
    • Deleted old VMs by hand
    • Cancelled some workflows to free resources
    • Reset the VM services deployment so the VM destroy queues had consumers again
    • Scaled up the RDS database instance, at 18:20 and again at 19:15
    • Turned down VM provisioning and blocked remote-docker jobs to shed load
    • Scaled down all pods that created and destroyed VMs
    • Deployed a revised distribution backend that kept remote-docker jobs out of the provisioning queues
    • Brought provisioning and distribution back one component at a time and reversed the mitigation code changes
    Action items
    • Make VM provisioning more robust to changes in load so it can recover from thundering herds
    • Make VM provisioning independent so its failure does not affect Docker jobs
    • Review and improve observability of RabbitMQ and the production queues
    • Batch requests to avoid hitting GCP API rate limits
    • Improve incident response for long-running incidents
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Database and CI system. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2