Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeFaulty deploymentComponentDatabaseSymptomLog floodClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    On 2025-03-12 from 10:58 UTC, alerts for high backend response times came in, and the MediaWiki deployments mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner, which serve MediaWiki for non-user-facing purposes, showed high latency and database errors. The External Storage cluster, whose hosts store the compressed text of wiki page revisions, had a sharp rise in load and connections. The same happened again on 2025-03-13 from 11:15 UTC.

    Trigger

    At 10:44 UTC on 12 March a Scap deployment of the PHP 8.1 rollout for mw-api-int, mw-parsoid and mw-jobrunner was run with the flag -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False; the rollout was deployed with Scap again at 11:15 UTC on 13 March.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Alerts for high backend response times started at 10:58 UTC on 12 March, 14 minutes after the Scap deployment; 2 on-call engineers were paged. The MediaWikiMemcachedHighErrorRate alert that pointed at the cause fired only briefly because its log pipeline was overloaded.

    Remediation
    • Deployed a patch to cirrus-streaming-updater that reduced SUP parallelism
    • Reduced the concurrency of the categoryMembershipChange job in changeprop-jobqueue
    • On 12 March, reverted 1126607 and 1126650 and re-ran Scap
    • On 13 March, rolling-restarted changeprop-jobqueue
    • Rolling-restarted mw-api-int
    • Disabled the categorymembership job in changeprop-jobqueue
    • Reverted 1127476 and 1127478
    • Redeployed mw-api-int to pick up the revert
    • Increased the number of mw-api-int replicas
    • Redeployed mw-jobrunner to pick up the revert
    • Redeployed mw-parsoid to pick up the revert
    Action items
    • Reduce the number of messages sent through channel:Memcached during failures
    • Add helm rollback functionality to Scap
    • Decide whether Scap should update helmfile-defaults when -Dbuild_mw_container_image:False is set
    • Consider removing envvars.inc from MediaWiki images
    • Consider "Why" dashboards that give an overview of a group of related components together with relevant links to follow
    • Coordinate incident responders better
    • Be able to work with MediaWiki developers during incidents
    Lessons

    The write-up puts the weight not on the technical root cause but on why the team could not see, even after the 12 March incident, that three MediaWiki deployments were running without Memcached. Alert dashboards showed what was happening, such as many busy PHP workers, but not why; dashboards linking components that affect each other, such as SQLBlobStore keys and External Storage, would have helped. The alert that pointed in the right direction did not stay firing and would probably have been lost among 78 others. The incident coordinator could not tell who was working on what or who had joined or left, the channels were noisy, the external impact was judged more critical than it was, and trace.wikimedia.org was not used although it might have helped.

  2. Symptoms

    At about 23:00 UTC on 21 January 2025, an automated alert reported that the CircleCI database instance holding archived data was almost out of free storage space. From 23:50 UTC customers saw slow starts and cancellations of workflows and jobs, and delays and difficulty viewing workflows in the CircleCI UI, although pipelines for a specific project could still be viewed.

    Trigger

    A code change to a function in the archival database on 16 January 2025 unintentionally made it write an excessive number of log messages, and the database filled its storage.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    An automated alert at about 23:00 UTC warned that the archival database was almost out of free storage, before customers were affected. The growing workflows queue was not linked to it at first because a separate alert about request volume fired at about the same time.

    Remediation
    • Scaled up the event consumer that processes the workflows queue at 23:44 UTC
    • Promoted a read replica of the archival database to a standalone primary at 23:55 UTC
    Action items
    • Fix the database function so it no longer writes an excessive number of log messages
    • Add a max duration to the workflows retry policy for archiving so it fails earlier than the default timeout
    • Move workflow archival to an event-based model that decouples it from the workflows service
    • Add forecast and anomaly monitoring for databases that alerts on unusual activity before it reaches critical levels
    Lessons

    The storage alert on the archival database did fire, but the database filled much faster than forecast, so there was little time to act before customers were affected. Because the workflows service called the archival service synchronously, a problem in the archival database slowed the whole workflows service.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve CI system and Database. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1