Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentDatabase replicationSymptomHigh error rateFactorHarmful manual actionClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    On 2 November 2020 the Cloudflare API and dashboard were degraded for six hours and 33 minutes. The success rate of API queries dropped at times to 75%, and the dashboard was up to 80 times slower than normal, while Cloudflare's edge network kept working.

    Trigger

    At 14:43 UTC a network switch in a control plane data center partly failed: it kept LACP and BGP running but stopped forwarding some packets, and it recovered on its own six minutes later.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    At 14:43 UTC alerts fired because the misbehaving switch was unreachable to pings. Engineers then saw that the primary authentication database was overwhelmed.

    Remediation
    • Shed load from the primary authentication database by slowing SSL certificate pushes to the edge, emails and other features
    • Moved API traffic that could use read replicas to the secondary data center by hand
    • Sent authentication calls fully back to the primary data center when the dashboard got worse
    • Rebuilt the first database replica, which put itself back into service at 21:20 UTC and returned performance to normal
    • Ramped the turned-down services back up so asynchronous processing could catch up
    Action items
    • Remove the cluster management limitation that requires rebuilding all replicas after a primary is promoted
    • Redesign the user sessions system so dashboard traffic can be steered between data centers
    • Change the auto-remediation configuration so a database replica is not promoted so quickly
    • Tune each system involved to be more resilient to failures of its dependencies
    Lessons

    Every system in the chain had redundancy and none failed completely; each only degraded, which made the chain of events much harder to model and foresee. Automating replica promotion so that it could trigger on a minute's notice had been a point of pride, but for at least one database a fast promotion can do more harm than the failure it answers. Most general-purpose cluster managers use Raft or Paxos rather than Byzantine fault tolerant protocols, accepting a rare failure mode in exchange for a protocol that is simpler to implement correctly and debug.

  2. Symptoms

    Reports came in of more WORKER_JOB_ERROR errors, which tell Transloadit there is a communication problem between its Uploaders, the machines that receive files and orchestrate Assemblies, and its Drones, the machines that run encoding tasks. Many Assemblies became much slower because retries with exponential back-off kicked in, and a few could not be replayed.

    Trigger

    A steep increase in HLS traffic, together with more Drones online processing the same volume faster, which put more load on the central Redis nodes.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Reports of an increased number of WORKER_JOB_ERROR errors.

    Remediation
    • Re-added lost messages and relaxed heartbeat monitoring as a stopgap
    • Upgraded Redis to the latest stable version
    • Doubled the Redis cluster to six nodes and then added three more, which made it worse
    • Brought the number of read replicas down to one, which cut traffic and failure rates
    • Capped how far Drones scale up in each region
    Action items
    • Add logging and alarms for approaching saturation
    • Find ways to decentralise the traffic between the Redis nodes and the Drones and Uploaders
    • Add sharding per Uploader on top of the sharding per region
    Lessons

    To handle more traffic Transloadit had to use fewer Redis nodes, not more: each added replica multiplied the replication traffic from the single leader that takes every write, so scaling up the number of nodes was the wrong call. Bandwidth had not been among the monitored Redis metrics.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Database replication and In-memory cache. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2