Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentDatabase replicationSymptomData lossFactorMonitoring blind spotClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    About an hour after LootLocker cut over from a managed database provider to its own MySQL deployment on 2026-04-28, data anomalies showed up in production. A small window of writes made shortly before the migration, spanning 2026-04-19 to 2026-04-20, had never reached the new database, and the service stayed degraded for about three hours after the cutover.

    Trigger

    On 2026-04-20 at about 16:20 BST, a routine credential rotation, made as part of an unrelated configuration fix, changed the credentials that the temporary replication process used for its database connection, and the process crashed.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Data anomalies were detected in production at about 11:30 BST, about an hour after the cutover.

    Remediation
    • Restored normal service behaviour first and deferred the root cause analysis
    • Requested a restore of the deleted source database from the previous provider
    • Replayed the affected records for impacted users from the restored source database
    Action items
    • Perform technical changes of comparable risk in a scheduled maintenance window instead of as live cutovers
    • Require a pre-cutover checklist that verifies replication or sync processes are live and caught up just before cutover
    • Require an explicit downstream impact review for credential rotations of service accounts used by long-running processes
    • Keep source systems until integrity in the target has been independently verified after cutover
    • Publish planned maintenance and migration notices in the in-product News feed as well as Discord, with clear impact statements and more advance notice
    Lessons

    The failure was a silent side effect of an unrelated change made eight days earlier: the replication process recovered and kept working, so there was no signal that data had been dropped, and a pre-cutover integrity check would have caught it. Deleting the source database before validating the new one made recovery much harder. Choosing a live migration to avoid downtime left no clean point to verify integrity, and the resulting degradation and two days of piecemeal recovery far exceeded what a short planned maintenance window would have cost. The announcement on Discord was not clear enough about the impact and came with too little notice.

  2. Symptoms

    On 19 February 2026, a node of the ClickHouse cluster behind PostHog's Logs product crashed, restarted and could not start again because it could not find a large amount of its data. Engineers then found that almost all of the Logs data stored on S3 was gone, so logs collected in the US region more than 3 days earlier were lost. Only the Logs product was affected.

    Trigger

    At 10:54 UTC a routine mutation was run to materialise an index. When it finished at 11:02, it set off a bug in ClickHouse's zero-copy replication.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    No automated alarm fired. At 19:40 UTC a node in the cluster crashed, restarted and failed to start because of the missing data, and the engineers who investigated found that most of the S3-backed data was gone.

    Remediation
    • Switched Logs to a new table without zero-copy replication and caught up on recent messages
    • Backfilled the Logs data from the 3 days of Kafka history
    Action items
    • Disable zero-copy replication on all clusters
    • Audit the whole Logs ClickHouse configuration and keep experimental features out of production
    • Enable S3 versioning on the storage buckets so objects deleted by a database bug can be recovered
    • Spot-check configurations and data integrity strategies for single points of failure before a product becomes generally available
    Lessons

    Running Logs in its own cluster kept every other product unaffected, and 3 days of Kafka retention saved the recent data. An experimental setting chosen for an early internal stage was allowed to stay in production. Monitoring covered only incoming and recent data, so petabytes were deleted over 8 hours without an alarm. Relying on database replication alone over shared storage was a single point of failure, and S3 versioning would have let the deleted files be recovered.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Database and Database replication. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2