Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeCapacity exhaustionComponentClient-side DNS resolver and cacheFactorUnreviewed defaultsClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

  1. Symptoms

    CI jobs failed now and then because a hostname could not be resolved. The failures came from tensorstore, appeared on several different instances and did not repeat consistently. The error read: "./tensorstore/util/result.h:420: Status not ok: status(): UNAVAILABLE: CURL error Could not resolve hostname: Could not resolve host: company-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com".

    Trigger

    An administrative pod running with host networking called sudo in a loop. Each sudo call looked up the node's own hostname, and with ndots:5 and four search domains every lookup became five queries, for both A and AAAA records.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Reports of flaky CI jobs that could not resolve an S3 bucket hostname, followed by i/o timeout errors in the CoreDNS logs.

    Remediation
    • added 'Defaults !fqdn' in /etc/sudoers.d/00-no-fqdn (mode 440) to the container image so sudo stopped looking up the hostname
    Lessons

    Traffic from CoreDNS to the VPC DNS resolver is limited to 1024 packets per second per interface, and drops show up only as UDP timeouts; the linklocal_allowance_exceeded counter in ethtool shows them. Names that are not fully qualified are multiplied by the search domains under ndots:5, and AAAA lookups double them again. sudo looks up the host's own name on every call unless 'Defaults !fqdn' is set.

  2. Symptoms

    Services on the production Amazon EKS cluster behind the idus marketplace threw intermittent errors whose cause was hard to pin down. Calls to external services such as RDS and Redis failed now and then, and whenever DNS traffic spiked, domain lookups answered slowly or failed outright.

    Trigger

    All CoreDNS pods were scheduled onto the same node, and that node's memory usage spiked until it ran out of memory.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The write-up does not say how the full outage was noticed. The earlier DNS trouble showed up as intermittent service errors, and investigating failed calls to RDS and Redis led to DNS resolution failures.

    Remediation
    • deployed NodeLocal DNSCache as a DaemonSet in front of CoreDNS
    • added a PodDisruptionBudget (maxUnavailable 1) and topologySpreadConstraints across zones for CoreDNS
    • lowered ndots from 5 to 2 with dnsConfig in the Deployments
    Lessons

    The CoreDNS setup that EKS creates by default (two pods) can be enough for a small or development cluster but becomes a bottleneck in a large production cluster, and DNS is a single point of failure that needs high availability and room to scale. Tuning the CoreDNS cache and buffer size only relieved the symptoms; the real load came from the extra queries that ndots:5 generates for external names. A CoreDNS pod without a memory limit can share a node's fate with everything else on it.

  3. Symptoms

    On May 10 the latency graphs of several services showed a few spikes of up to about one second, then latency climbed to five seconds and then to 20 seconds, and it stayed there for a long time. The same pattern appeared on many services, not just one.

    Trigger

    Several services sent a high volume of external DNS queries, all of which went through kube-dns.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Latency graphs of several services showed the rise; engineers then looked at load per kube-dns pod.

    Lessons

    By default a pod discovers DNS through the kube-dns cluster IP and uses the ClusterFirst policy, so even external lookups go through kube-dns. If a pod does not need cluster DNS, set its dnsPolicy to Default or None. Check the DNS policy early and often. iptables picks backends at random and is not a load balancer, so pods behind a cluster IP, kube-dns included, can carry very different loads.

  4. Symptoms

    Customers of the Zalando Fashion Store got a high rate of errors on all web product pages and outfit pages for more than an hour. The errors came from the main data aggregation layer service, which runs in one of Zalando's Kubernetes clusters.

    Trigger

    Calls from the aggregation layer to a single, not very important downstream service started timing out. The aggregation layer returned 404s for them, clients retried, and the resulting spike in requests became a spike in DNS queries to CoreDNS.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The on-call engineer for the aggregation layer phoned the on-call Kubernetes engineer. Automatic paging did not happen because the cluster's monitoring and alerting ran inside the cluster and failed along with DNS. The Kubernetes engineer then saw that the CoreDNS pods were being OOM-killed.

    Remediation
    • Raised the CoreDNS memory requests and limits by hand from 100Mi to 2000Mi
    Action items
    • Introduce a more resilient DNS setup: CoreDNS fronted by dnsmasq on every node
    • Improve high-level alerting from outside the clusters, so that a cluster problem is known before or at the same time as applications are affected
    • Improve incident response processes and tooling so that any on-call engineer can escalate directly to other teams when automatic paging fails, for example through a chat bot
    Lessons

    The Kubernetes DNS setup was far from resilient enough: a single application could take down DNS for everything in the cluster. The blast radius of one application sending more DNS queries should be limited to one node at most, ideally to single pods. Known Kubernetes DNS problems, such as Linux kernel races in conntrack handling and the ndots 5 problem, were familiar to the team and partly mitigated, but their combined effect on the DNS infrastructure was worse than the team had understood. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster was not robust enough: when the cluster's DNS broke, it could not page anyone, and recovery took longer than it should have.

Check your cluster for this

These 4 cases involve Client-side DNS resolver and cache and CoreDNS. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1