Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentAuthoritative DNS servers and recordsSymptomDNS resolution failuresOrganisationMicrosoft AzureClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    From 15:41 UTC on 29 October 2025, customers and Microsoft services using Azure Front Door (AFD) and Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN) got connection timeout errors and DNS resolution issues. Monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

    Trigger

    At 15:35 UTC a specific sequence of valid customer configuration changes, made across two different AFD control plane build versions, produced incompatible customer configuration metadata that was deployed to the edge sites.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The configuration protection system detected the data plane impact and blocked configuration changes at 15:43 UTC, and monitoring alerts started the investigation at 15:48 UTC.

    Remediation
    • The configuration protection system automatically blocked all new and in-flight configuration changes worldwide
    • Removed the problematic customer configurations from the latest LKG snapshot by hand
    • Blocked all customer configuration changes from propagating to the data plane
    • Deployed the updated LKG configuration across the global fleet
    • Moved Azure Portal away from Azure Front Door
    • Rebalanced traffic by hand to a few healthy edge sites, then switched back to automatic traffic management
    • Blocked all AFD customer configuration changes at the Azure Resource Manager level until safeguards were in place
    Action items
    • Fix the control plane incompatibility and the data plane bug
    • Process each customer configuration completely and synchronously before production stages
    • Add stages to the phased configuration rollout, with longer bake time between them
    • Move configuration processing on data plane servers into isolated worker processes
    • Reduce configuration propagation time from 45 minutes to about 15 minutes
    • Test backwards compatibility with configurations generated by earlier control plane builds
    • Move critical first-party infrastructure to an active-active setup with fail away
    • Isolate customer configuration and traffic with micro cell segmentation of the AFD data plane
    • Restore customer configurations within one hour by using the local configuration cache
    • Cut data plane recovery further, to about 10 minutes
    • Remove delays in Azure Service Health alerts by raising resource thresholds
    • Extend automated Azure Service Health alerts to similar classes of service degradation
    • Fail over support request systems faster so Premier and Unified customers can always open requests
    Lessons

    Microsoft describes configuration propagation risk as inherent to a global Content Delivery Network, in which route, WAF and origin changes must be deployed quickly worldwide. Both this incident and the 9 October AFD incident came from that risk. This time the incompatible metadata passed a protection system that advances only on healthy data plane signals, because the crash came later from delayed asynchronous processing. Some learnings and repair items from the earlier incident applied here as well. Microsoft advises customers to build a resilient global HTTP ingress layer that stays available during regional or network disruptions, to manage resources through the REST API or PowerShell when management portals are unavailable, and to configure Azure Service Health alerts so the right people hear about service issues.

  2. Symptoms

    From 03:45 CST on 23 April 2024, FQDNs in two system domains of Azure in China, chinacloudapp.cn and chinacloudsites.cn, gradually stopped resolving, and customers in the Azure China regions had trouble connecting to many Azure services and managing resources. Internal monitors alerted engineers to the degradation at 04:37 CST.

    Trigger

    At 03:45 CST a configuration change made through a domain registrar, as a step of a domain decommissioning workflow, updated the nameservers of chinacloudapp.cn and chinacloudsites.cn to a set of inactive servers.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Internal monitors alerted engineers to the degradation in the Azure China Cloud at 04:37 CST and created an incident, which the engineering team acknowledged at 04:39 CST.

    Remediation
    • Reverted the two domains to their previous working nameservers
    Action items
    • Suspended further runs of the domain lifecycle process until the management tool covers Azure in China
    • Make the validation process of domain lifecycle management include signals from all cloud regions
    • Add validations that get nameserver information by resolving the zone directly over the Internet
Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Authoritative DNS servers and records and CDN and edge network. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2