Incident Library
Applied filters Root causeConfiguration changeComponentAuthoritative DNS servers and recordsSymptomDNS resolution failuresClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

  1. Symptoms

    On 20 August 2025 at 10:02 AM Pacific time, an automated uptime check on temple.2i2c.cloud started failing and paged 2i2c: the JupyterHub at temple.2i2c.cloud could not be reached, shortly before the community that uses it was to give a demo.

    Trigger

    At 9:21 AM, while setting up a new cluster for Temple, a wildcard DNS record *.temple.2i2c.cloud was added pointing to the new cluster's Ingress IP.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Automated uptime alerts caught the failure at 10:02 AM, before the community reported it in a support ticket at 10:09 AM.

    Remediation
    • Added an explicit A record for temple.2i2c.cloud in Namecheap
    • Lowered the DNS TTL from the 30-minute default to 5 minutes
    • Offered the community member running the demo an /etc/hosts entry as a workaround
    Action items
    • Give everyone on the team access to Namecheap, or move to another DNS provider
    • Use a 5-minute TTL instead of 30 minutes for all new DNS entries
    • Document that adding a *.X.2i2c.cloud DNS entry requires adding an X.2i2c.cloud entry as well
    Lessons

    Adding a wildcard record for a subdomain stopped a broader wildcard from answering for that subdomain's own name, so a *.X.2i2c.cloud record needs an X.2i2c.cloud record alongside it. The 30-minute default TTL at Namecheap meant any DNS fix could take that long to propagate, and the engineer creating the original record had no access to the DNS provider.

  2. Symptoms

    From 03:45 CST on 23 April 2024, FQDNs in two system domains of Azure in China, chinacloudapp.cn and chinacloudsites.cn, gradually stopped resolving, and customers in the Azure China regions had trouble connecting to many Azure services and managing resources. Internal monitors alerted engineers to the degradation at 04:37 CST.

    Trigger

    At 03:45 CST a configuration change made through a domain registrar, as a step of a domain decommissioning workflow, updated the nameservers of chinacloudapp.cn and chinacloudsites.cn to a set of inactive servers.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Internal monitors alerted engineers to the degradation in the Azure China Cloud at 04:37 CST and created an incident, which the engineering team acknowledged at 04:39 CST.

    Remediation
    • Reverted the two domains to their previous working nameservers
    Action items
    • Suspended further runs of the domain lifecycle process until the management tool covers Azure in China
    • Make the validation process of domain lifecycle management include signals from all cloud regions
    • Add validations that get nameserver information by resolving the zone directly over the Internet
  3. Symptoms

    From 1:54 PM ET on 7 September 2023, Square products and services were unavailable, and at 2:02 PM ET engineers were notified of infrastructure issues and began investigating DNS. Square Online websites stayed up, but their customers could not make payments.

    Trigger

    At 11:04 AM ET a host-based firewall rule change was deployed to enable region communication, which increased the size of the firewall rules on nodes. Combined with a DNS service upgrade, it put unexpected load on the internal DNS servers. The timeline also lists a DNS zone change at 1:56 PM ET.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Engineers were notified of infrastructure issues at 2:02 PM ET, eight minutes after services became unavailable.

    Remediation
    • Shed network traffic to the DNS servers and started bringing up new DNS servers by hand
    • Deployed networking changes by hand to re-enable the authorization and access services
    • Deployed the networking changes by hand to all data centers
    • Rebuilt the DNS servers
    • Built a new configuration from the reverted firewall ruleset and pushed it to the DNS hosts
    Action items
    • Move the DNS infrastructure onto isolated infrastructure
    • Add monitoring and optimizations for critical networking infrastructure
    • Optimize dependencies between the deploy and platform infrastructure where feasible
    • Expand support for Offline Mode and improve communication about when it is available
  4. Symptoms

    On 25 January 2023, shortly after a deployment to the crates.io production infrastructure at 09:15 UTC, the DNS record for static.crates.io failed to resolve for an estimated 10-15 minutes. Builds failed for users because crates could not be downloaded.

    Trigger

    A Terraform deployment to production contained a new TLS certificate for the current CDN of static.crates.io and updated DNS records; Terraform removed the current certificate and DNS records first and recreated the records only after the new certificate had been issued.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Remediation
    • Terraform finished the deployment and created a new DNS record for static.crates.io, which ended the outage
    Action items
    • Document the process of deploying changes to production, including how to pick the Git commit and how to review the changeset
    • Deploy changes developed and tested in isolation on staging individually and in sequence to production, and add this to the documentation
    • Deploy changes to production when they are merged into the main branch, so the configuration in Git and what is deployed do not drift
    Lessons

    Deploying the TLS certificate change and the DNS record change separately would have avoided the outage. Changes tested one at a time on staging need to reach production one at a time and in order, the production deploy process needs to be written down so it can be improved, and merged changes need to be deployed promptly so Git and production do not drift apart.

Check your cluster for this

These 4 cases involve Authoritative DNS servers and records and CDN and edge network. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1