Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentInterior routing (IGP)SymptomNetwork unreachableFactorNo configuration testsClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    From 07:08 UTC on 25 January 2023, customers saw long network latency and timeouts when connecting to resources in Azure regions and to other Microsoft services such as Microsoft 365 and Power Platform. Microsoft's monitoring detected DNS and WAN issues from 07:11 UTC.

    Trigger

    A network engineer adding capacity to the global WAN in Madrid ran a step of a recently changed standard operating procedure that purged the IGP database; on the router manufacturer involved, that command runs on all IGP-joined routers instead of only the local one.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Monitoring detected DNS and WAN issues from 07:11 UTC and alerted the on-call engineers within 5 minutes of the command being run. The team reviewed all recent changes and identified the command by 08:20 UTC. The engineer making the change was not informed of the alerts because of the unqualified changes to the SOP.

    Remediation
    • Restarted by hand the paused WAN health and traffic engineering systems, which ended the remaining packet loss
    Action items
    • Audit and block similar widespread-impact commands across all three vendors for all WAN router roles
    • Give on-call engineers real-time visibility of approved and unqualified activity on network devices
    • Run regular mandatory operational training and attestation of following all SOPs
    • Have the Change Advisory Board review all SOPs still pending qualification within 30 days
  2. Symptoms

    On 25 October 2021 from about 11:16, traffic to the DNS servers in KT's network rose sharply, and then KT's internet service failed across the whole country. KT recognised the internet outage at 11:20, and the outage lasted about 89 minutes until KT finished recovery at about 12:45.

    Trigger

    During the replacement of an enterprise network router at KT's Busan office, worked on remotely from the Busan communication center, a worker entered a routing configuration script that lacked the 'exit' command that should have ended the IS-IS part of the configuration.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    KT recognised the internet outage at 11:20, four minutes after DNS traffic began to surge at 11:16. The Ministry of Science and ICT saw the traffic increase in its own monitoring, and KT reported the outage to the ministry at 11:40.

    Remediation
    • Isolated the router where the faulty routing configuration was entered
    • Logged in to each regional router, deleted the faulty processes and restarted them
    Action items
    • Check the network management of major carriers, including their work procedures and the systems that stop technical errors from spreading
    • Consider having major carriers introduce simulation systems that diagnose errors from network work in advance
    • Have the NMS center and network operations center of each major carrier check technically that approved work plans are followed
    • Strengthen safeguards in routing work, such as limiting the number of route entries updated at once below a set level
    • Strengthen the monitoring of carriers' outages and develop technology, including AI-based preventive diagnosis, for network stability and resilience
    • Prepare structural measures for a stable network architecture and network survivability
    • Let carriers notify users of outages through SNS, text messages and other means, not only the website
    Lessons

    The investigation named management problems and technical problems. On the management side, work approved for the night was done during the day, partner company workers did the routing work without a work manager, and the work was done with the network still connected. On the technical side, the two pre-verification steps were people reading the script and missed the missing 'exit', there was no virtual testbed for trying the work on a disconnected network, and nothing stopped an error in one region from spreading to the whole country.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve BGP routing and Interior routing (IGP). kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1