Cases6 cases

1 to 5 of 6

1. IL-0098 After 2i2c moved from ingress-nginx to nginx-ingress, a hub's Ingress took priority over cert-manager's temporary Ingress for the same host, so new hubs could not get TLS certificates

   2i2c2026

   Symptoms

   An attempt to launch a new hub failed because its ingress could not obtain a new TLS certificate. The day before, the same engineer had recreated the support deployment on the 2i2c-aws-us cluster and seen its TLS certificate orders stuck pending.

   Misrouted requestsDeploys failing

   Trigger

   Creating new hub deployments that needed new TLS certificates on clusters recently migrated from ingress-nginx to nginx-ingress.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllercert-manager

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effect

   Detection

   An attempt to launch a new hub failed; the engineer had seen certificate orders stuck pending on another cluster the day before and declared an incident.

   Remediation

   • annotated the Ingress objects that need TLS so that cert-manager could edit them in place to complete the ACME challenge

   Action items

   • Follow-up tracked in https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/issues/8016
   • Follow-up tracked in https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/issues/3278

   Lessons

   Swapping one ingress controller for another can change how Ingress objects that share a host are combined. cert-manager's temporary challenge Ingress depends on that behaviour, so the breakage shows up when a deployment needs a new certificate. 2i2c notes that it got lucky: it had already learned of this possible cause while testing on an internal cluster, and changing the cert-manager configuration was quick.

   View case
2. IL-0092 Upgrading ingress-nginx from 1.12.0 to 1.14.3 brought a newer ModSecurity and OWASP Core Rule Set whose false positives blocked HMPPS Auth, so users could not sign in to their applications

   UK Ministry of Justice2026

   Symptoms

   At 08:56 on 30 March 2026, about an hour and three quarters after the rollout of a new ingress-nginx to production began, the MoJ Cloud Platform team noticed messages in the #hmpps-auth-audit-registers Slack channel about ModSecurity unexpectedly blocking requests. Users in HMPPS also raised incidents with the MoJ service desk.

   High error rateService outage

   Trigger

   The Cloud Platform team began deploying ingress-nginx 1.14.3, on images maintained by Chainguard, to the three production ingresses at 07:11 on 30 March 2026.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllerWeb application firewall rules

   Contributing factor

   Unrepresentative staging

   Detection

   At 08:56 the Cloud Platform team saw messages in the #hmpps-auth-audit-registers Slack channel showing ModSecurity blocking requests unexpectedly; HMPPS users also raised incidents with the MoJ service desk.

   Remediation

   • rolled the ingress-nginx deployment back to the previous version, from 09:14 to 09:43
   • HMPPS applied ModSecurity rule exclusions for the rules blocking traffic to HMPPS Auth
   • added a temporary global exclusion for the CRS rule triggered by the PostHog cookie
   • redeployed ingress-nginx 1.14.3 with both exclusions in place, completed at 14:00

   Action items

   • Rescope the PostHog cookie so it is no longer sent with requests to all *.justice.gov.uk services
   • Remove the temporary global exclusion once the PostHog cookie has expired from enough users' browsers
   • Remind service teams to run dev and test workloads through the non-production ingress controllers so future ModSecurity and CRS updates are tested
   • Run production and non-production workloads in separate clusters in Cloud Platform 3.0, so non-production workloads must use the non-production ingress

   Lessons

   An ingress controller upgrade that bundles a web application firewall also changes which requests are allowed, not only how they are routed. A beta or non-production ingress only catches false positives for traffic that actually passes through it, and teams that keep their test workloads on the production ingress miss them. A fix on the client side, such as rescoping a cookie, takes effect only when old cookies have expired in users' browsers, so the rule change has to wait for it or ship with an exclusion.

   View case
3. IL-0405 An expired AWS Load Balancer Controller webhook certificate left no healthy targets and took BSEE SaaS down

   PortSwigger2026

   Symptoms

   From 10:00 UTC on 11 January 2026 every BSEE SaaS instance in PortSwigger's US and Canada regions was unavailable: customers could not open the Web UI or start scans. The platform team learned of it only when customers reported it through support at 09:52 UTC the next day.

   Service outageTLS certificate errors

   Trigger

   The upgrade of the AWS Load Balancer Controller from v1.14.1 to v1.16.0 on 28 November 2025 left an orphaned webhook TLS secret that cert-manager could not renew, and the certificate in it expired on 8 January 2026.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllerAdmission webhookcert-managerHelmConfigMaps and SecretsCloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Change with a delayed effectMonitoring blind spot

   Detection

   Customers reported the outage through support at 09:52 UTC on 12 January 2026, almost 24 hours after impact began, and the platform team began investigating at 10:00 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Deleted the orphaned aws-load-balancer-tls secrets in the US and Canada clusters
   • Redeployed the AWS Load Balancer Controller configuration with Helm
   • Verified that new certificates were generated and the webhooks worked again

   Action items

   • Audit all clusters for orphaned secrets that have no owning Certificate resource and resolve them
   • Add high-level application access alerting for each SaaS cluster from an external probe

   View case
4. IL-0203 A routine Kubernetes cluster system update made the AWS Load Balancer Controller fail, so new pods were never registered with the ALB and Honeycomb's EU1 ingest and UI went down once the last old pods were replaced

   Honeycomb2024

   Symptoms

   Event ingestion and the Honeycomb UI in EU1 became unavailable at 22:00:10 UTC on April 9, 2024, and the status page reported that the EU1 instance was down. Both the ingestion service and the service behind the web UI stopped at roughly the same moment.

   Service outageStale endpoint routing

   Trigger

   A routine system update to the Kubernetes cluster, rolled out earlier on April 9, followed by a regular deployment that replaced pods one at a time.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllerCloud load balancer

   Contributing factor

   Monitoring blind spotUnrepresentative stagingChange with a delayed effect

   Detection

   The first status post, saying the EU1 instance was down, went up at 15:08 PDT (22:08 UTC), about 8 minutes after the outage began. There was no alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller.

   Remediation

   • Restarted the AWS Load Balancer Controller
   • Rolled back the Kubernetes cluster system update

   Action items

   • Find the exact cause of the failure so the system update can be deployed safely
   • Add monitoring and alerting on the AWS Load Balancer Controller so on-call engineers learn of a failure quickly and can pause deployments

   Lessons

   A rolling deployment can look healthy while the component that wires new pods into the load balancer is broken; the failure only shows when the last old pod goes away. Honeycomb now treats the AWS Load Balancer Controller as a critical component that needs its own alerting, so deployments can be paused before they remove the last pods that still receive traffic. Extensive testing in development and staging did not reveal the bad interaction.

   View case
5. IL-0522 An ingress-nginx chart upgrade deleted the jenkins.io Ingress and Fastly served HTTP/503 errors for hours

   Jenkins project2021

   Symptoms

   At 11:32 UTC on 18 November 2021, a user reported in the jenkinsci/jenkins Gitter channel that https://www.jenkins.io/doc/pipeline/steps/ was answering HTTP/503 errors with the message "Guru meditation" from Fastly's varnish.

   Service outageResources deleted

   Trigger

   The ingress-nginx Helm chart was upgraded from 4.0.6 to 4.0.8 at 10:42 UTC, and the new chart added an admission webhook rule that forbids Nginx configuration blocks in Ingress annotations.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Ingress controllerAdmission webhookHelmCDN and edge network

   Contributing factor

   Unverified assumptionCache-masked failureMonitoring blind spotHarmful manual action

   Detection

   A user reported in the jenkinsci/jenkins Gitter channel at 11:32 UTC that a jenkins.io page answered HTTP/503 errors, and status.jenkins.io reported the incident at 11:49 UTC.

   Remediation

   • Disabled the automated systems, rolled the ingress-nginx chart back to 4.0.6 and deleted the admission webhook by hand
   • Removed the forbidden annotations from the jenkins.io configuration
   • Upgraded the jenkins.io Helm chart to the last version known to work with ingress-nginx 4.0.8
   • Redeployed the jenkins.io Helm chart through the automated system and told Fastly to drop all cached pages

   Action items

   • Always read the changelog in depth when updating the ingress controllers, with two people pairing in real time
   • Add custom Datadog monitoring for www.origin.jenkins.io so that such an outage is detected
   • Make the monitor send the Host header www.jenkins.io so it is not redirected to Fastly
   • Check a set of pages, such as the pipeline steps page, not only the front page
   • Consider an ephemeral k3s end-to-end test before deploying to production

   Lessons

   Trusting a patch version of a Helm chart for the Ingress controller without reading its changelog in depth let a new admission rule remove the jenkins.io Ingress in production. Without monitoring on origin.jenkins.io, a user found the outage. A complete staging cluster with the same DNS setup would have caught the problem before production.

   View case

By root cause1