Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentISP and transit networksSymptomNetwork unreachableClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases3 cases

1 to 3 of 3

  1. Symptoms

    At 04:01 UTC on 15 December 2024, StatusCake monitoring sent SMS alerts that OpenStreetMap.org was unreachable. The website and the mapping API had gone completely offline at 03:53 UTC.

    Trigger

    HE.net's routing equipment in Amsterdam failed at 03:53 UTC on 15 December 2024.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    StatusCake monitoring detected the outage at 04:01 UTC and sent SMS alerts, and the incident was reported to the operations team at once.

    Remediation
    • Activated a read-only backup instance of OpenStreetMap.org in Dublin
    • Brought a new Equinix Internet link into service in Amsterdam, bypassing HE.net and restoring full functionality
    • HE.net replaced its routing hardware and restored its service, and routing through HE.net resumed
    Action items
    • Move to a multi-ISP architecture so another provider can take over when one fails
    • Research backup ISPs for the Amsterdam servers, including BGP and keeping HE.net as a fallback
    • Add deeper route and latency monitoring and an automated escalation protocol
    • Hold failover drills for switching between ISPs and keep replication up to date
    • Agree SLAs with HE.net and Equinix Internet with defined escalation procedures and response times
    • Prepare the 4G out-of-band system as a manual fallback uplink that can sync Postgres replication data, and upgrade its hardware
    • Document outage communication procedures and delegate communication during outages
    • Investigate decoupling the OAuth service so authentication keeps working while the database is read-only
    Lessons

    Relying on HE.net alone left the Amsterdam servers with a single point of failure, so OpenStreetMap will keep multiple upstream providers. The 4G out-of-band link proved invaluable and should be able to carry data synchronisation. Resumed replication would have restored editing faster than the read-only backup. Frequent contact with the ISP gave no useful estimates, so the SLA needs to be better understood. Alerting on upstream connectivity needs refining, and a read-only OpenStreetMap.org also blocked logins to services that were not affected, because it could not save new tokens.

  2. Symptoms

    At about 06:00 UTC on 10 January 2024, SourceHut's monitoring raised the alarm as a layer 3 DDoS attack hit its infrastructure in the PHL datacenter, and at about 09:00 UTC SourceHut lost all access to its PHL network. PHL was the primary datacenter, and the network became unreachable for SourceHut staff and the general public alike.

    Trigger

    A layer 3 DDoS attack against SourceHut's PHL infrastructure that began at about 06:00 UTC on 10 January 2024 and broadened to more of the PHL subnet on 11 January.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    SourceHut's monitoring systems noticed that something was wrong and raised the alarm from about 06:00 UTC on 10 January.

    Remediation
    • Got Cogent, through the colocation provider, to narrow the null route from the /24 to the targeted /32, which mostly restored service on 10 January
    • Moved DNS to an external DNS provider
    • Brought up a new primary database in AMS
    • Restored backups from FRE to AMS
    • Applied the difference between production data and the last backups by hand
    • Provisioned a new mail system and configured the mail services for it
    • Set up an OVH box that NATs traffic through OVH's DDoS-resistant network to the production subnet in AMS
    • Used a temporary subnet from the PHL network provider for out-of-band access to the PHL servers
    • Served pages.sr.ht through an out-of-band link to PHL while its object storage was migrated
    • Emailed pages.sr.ht users whose apex records pointed at the PHL subnet with instructions
    • Ran build workers on dedicated bare-metal OVH servers
    Action items
    • Provision a new standby database
    • Configure backups from AMS to FRE
    • Install a new monitoring system
    • Retire the PHL datacenter installation and ship its servers to AMS
    • Move build service back onto SourceHut-operated servers once the build servers are shipped from PHL to AMS
    • Research and implement a way to run SourceHut in an on-premise Kubernetes cluster
    • Plan a second production-ready datacenter to load balance against, able to take over full service in a datacenter outage
    Lessons

    The operational plans SourceHut kept for failures up to the loss of a whole datacenter proved important in this incident. The incident exposed a known shortcoming in redundancy and resilience that the team was working on but had not finished, and the response of the upstream network to the attack did more damage than anything else.

  3. Symptoms

    From about 03:00 UTC on 30 June 2023, Fastmail and a fraction of the internet could not communicate with each other, and Fastmail first heard of it from customers through support tickets and social media. The problem lasted about 19 hours and affected an estimated 3-5% of customers as well as some email servers.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Customers told Fastmail through support tickets and social media. Fastmail's own monitors in multiple locations and its staff were not on affected networks and saw nothing.

    Action items
    • Select a provider for a second transit connection directly into Fastmail's servers, via Megaport or a provider present in 365's New Jersey datacenter, so that Fastmail controls the outbound path and can route around a network with problems
    Lessons

    With a single path for outbound traffic, Fastmail could not route around a provider's network problem and could not fix it itself. Being able to choose between several outbound paths would let Fastmail get everyone back online faster.

Check your cluster for this

These 3 cases involve ISP and transit networks and BGP routing. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause1