Cases4 cases

1 to 4 of 4

1. IL-0144 A systemd security update installed by unattended-upgrades lost the DNS configuration of Ubuntu 18.04 VMs, so AKS kubelets could not resolve registry names and pods failed with ImagePullBackOff

   Microsoft Azure2022

   Symptoms

   From 06:00 UTC on 30 August 2022, Azure VMs running Ubuntu 18.04 (bionic) with unattended-upgrades enabled began failing DNS resolution and losing network connectivity. Several Azure teams, among them the AKS and Azure Container Apps teams, were alerted by production alerts shortly after the update packages were published.

   DNS resolution failuresImage pull failuresMonitoring outage

   Trigger

   Unattended-upgrades on Ubuntu 18.04 VMs installed a Canonical security update published at 06:00 UTC on 30 August 2022, including systemd version 237-3ubuntu10.54.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Node operating system imagekubeletContainer registry and its credentialsClient-side DNS resolver and cache

   Contributing factor

   No staged rolloutExcessive blast radiusAutomation amplification

   Detection

   Several Azure teams, including AKS and Azure Container Apps, were alerted by production alerts shortly after the packages were published; incoming support cases then confirmed which Ubuntu versions were affected.

   Remediation

   • pointed customers to Canonical's description of the systemd bug and its fix
   • recommended rebooting affected VMs or running a template script that repairs DNS resolution
   • built automatic detection and remediation for AKS nodes and rolled it out across all regions
   • mitigated the remaining AKS customers manually through support

   Action items

   • Review the process that lets critical security updates bypass Safe Deployment Practices
   • Improve monitoring of the AKS data plane to alert on an uptick of errors
   • Review AKS monitoring algorithms so that similar VM errors are detected and alerted on
   • Establish an improved escalation path to Canonical during outages and add it to internal Technical Service Guides
   • AKS takes full control of the node security patch mechanism, with additional testing and controlled release of patches (estimated December 2022)
   • Work with Canonical to run dedicated tests on proposed packages before they are published for Azure IaaS VMs
   • Establish a process with Canonical to close the testing gap for the upgrade scenario (estimated March 2023)
   • Give AKS customers maintenance window control and environment staging for these patches (estimated December 2023)

   Lessons

   Security patches applied automatically by unattended-upgrades, once a day by default, and outside Azure's Safe Deployment Practices reached Ubuntu 18.04 VMs in every Azure region, so one systemd regression became a DNS outage across Azure. On AKS, lost node DNS showed up as image pull failures such as ImagePullBackoff, because kubelet could not resolve the registry. Azure plans to put node security patching under AKS's control with testing and controlled release; customers can use automatic node image upgrade for AKS, or automatic VM guest patching for VMs, instead of unattended-upgrades.

   View case
2. IL-0008 An unresponsive OPA validating webhook crash-looped the API server during a GKE master upgrade, and node auto-repair then recreated every node

   Jetstack2019

   Symptoms

   Jetstack was upgrading the master of a development cluster that many teams use to test their apps during the working day, a regional Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) cluster in europe-west1. The upgrade ran through Jetstack's GKE Terraform pipeline and did not finish before the 20-minute Terraform timeout, while the GKE console still showed the cluster as upgrading.

   Upgrade stallControl plane unresponsiveNode recreation loopService outage

   Trigger

   A planned master upgrade of the shared development cluster. The same upgrade had been done on another pre-production environment earlier that day, and no API downtime was expected.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Admission webhookGKE control planeKubernetes API serverkubelet

   Contributing factor

   Excessive blast radiusNo health probesMonitoring blind spotAutomation amplification

   Detection

   The first sign was the master upgrade missing the 20-minute Terraform timeout; re-running the pipeline returned the kube-apiserver unhealthy error. The cause was identified with the help of Google Support.

   Remediation

   • Deleted the OPA ValidatingAdmissionWebhook resource during a window of API server access

   Action items

   • Limit the OPA webhook to the namespaces where the policy applies and development teams have access
   • Enable the webhook only for Ingress and Service resources, the only resources the policy validates
   • Add a liveness probe so OPA is restarted when it stops responding, and update the OPA documentation
   • Follow the open upstream Kubernetes issue about this behaviour

   Lessons

   With alerting on API server response times, the team might have seen CREATE and UPDATE requests slow down across the board as soon as the OPA-backed webhook was first deployed. Every workload needs probes: OPA looked so simple to deploy that the team skipped the Helm chart, which adds a livenessProbe for the admission controller containers among other adjustments to the tutorial configuration. Others had hit the same problem, and an upstream issue to improve it was still open.

   View case
3. IL-0035 Worker nodes went NotReady after a new ElastAlert rule without memory limits used up node memory

   NU.nl2019

   Symptoms

   The NU.nl development team got reports that several services on one of its Kubernetes clusters behaved erratically: occasional error pages, slow responses and timeouts. The affected services were mostly internal tools and dashboards.

   Node NotReadyHigh error rateHigh latencyIntermittent timeoutsMonitoring outageOOMKilled

   Trigger

   A new ElastAlert rule, deployed shortly before from the command line, that fired if the Cloudfront-* Elasticsearch indexes stopped receiving documents; those indexes take a few million requests per hour, and the rule made ElastAlert's memory grow without bound.

   Root cause

   Configuration change

   Component

   Container memory limitkubeletPrometheus

   Contributing factor

   No resource requests or limitsUnreviewed defaultsNo alert on limitMonitoring blind spotExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Users reported error pages, slow responses and timeouts from several services; no alert fired.

   Remediation

   • terminated the NotReady nodes one by one so the auto-scaling group replaced them (the new nodes also went NotReady, but Prometheus and Grafana landed on a stable node)
   • found the ElastAlert pods' memory growth on the Grafana pod memory dashboard
   • fixed the ElastAlert problem that caused the memory growth

   Action items

   • Define alerts on resource usage such as CPU, memory and disk space
   • Keep researching an alerting strategy that combines Elasticsearch, Prometheus Alertmanager and New Relic
   • Consider exporting metrics out of the cluster and running Grafana outside it, on EC2 or a separate Kubernetes cluster
   • Either visualise the important metrics in the ELK stack or make Prometheus and Grafana more available, and improve the metrics strategy
   • Set resource limits for ElastAlert through the Helm values
   • Configure namespaces with default memory requests and limits
   • Isolate customer-facing workloads from build, logging and monitoring workloads (a dedicated node group, or later a separate tools cluster)
   • Deploy everything through automation such as Jenkins pipelines, and consider a GitOps approach
   • Deploy through a pipeline that includes a smoke test step
   • Make Kubernetes and cloud infrastructure work part of the team's sprints, picked up by all team members while pairing with more experienced members, and hold workshops that go deep into specific topics

   Lessons

   Fixing the root cause covers only a small part of what an incident can teach; the chain of smaller failures around it is where most of the learning is. A pod without a memory limit can take whole nodes down, so limits need defaults at the namespace level. Monitoring that runs inside the cluster it watches goes blind with it. Changes installed by hand from the command line leave the rest of the team without a record of what changed.

   View case
4. IL-0038 kubelet rollout hit a Kubernetes bug and left every node in a cluster NotReady, triggering mass pod eviction

   Oath2018

   Symptoms

   During a rolling update of a kubelet change in one of Oath's on-premises production clusters, nodes started going NotReady, and soon all nodes in the cluster were NotReady.

   Node NotReadyPod evictionPods Pending

   Trigger

   A change to kubelet was rolled out across the nodes of one cluster; on restart, kubelet cleans up transient cgroup files, and a Kubernetes bug in that step left kubelet stuck instead of starting.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   kubeletKubernetes controller manager

   Contributing factor

   No health probesExcessive blast radius

   Detection

   Nodes reported NotReady and the eviction graphs climbed while the kubelet rollout was in progress.

   Remediation

   • failed the affected data center over so users were routed to the next available data center

   Action items

   • Run a functional test of kubelet after each upgrade batch and certify it before the next 30% of nodes are updated

   Lessons

   Check kubelet after upgrading it before moving to the next batch; a simple curl against the kubelet API would have caught this. The node controller's eviction throttling and full disruption mode, which the speakers note is not well documented, kept a cluster-wide kubelet failure from evicting every pod.

   View case

By root cause3