Cases5 cases

1 to 5 of 5

1. IL-0201 A framework upgrade caused kernel panics in GitHub's Kubernetes infrastructure, and GitHub.com web and API requests, mostly for issues and pull requests, failed intermittently for about 16 hours

   GitHub2025

   Symptoms

   From 18:05 UTC on March 17, 2025, GitHub.com web and API requests failed now and then for a small percentage of users, mostly requests about issues and pull requests. At 18:39 UTC the status page reported degraded performance for Issues.

   High error rateIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   A framework upgrade rolled out to GitHub's Kubernetes infrastructure caused kernel panics.

   Root cause

   Breaking change in an upgrade

   Component

   Linux kernel

   Contributing factor

   –

   Detection

   The status page opened the incident at 18:39 UTC, 34 minutes after the failures began, as an investigation of reports of degraded performance for Issues.

   Remediation

   • Downgraded the framework upgrade that caused the kernel panics
   • Disabled the problematic feature of the framework

   Action items

   • Investigate why the upgrade caused the kernel panics
   • Take steps to temporarily prevent the problem from coming back
   • Work out longer-term patch plans
   • Improve observability so that similar classes of problems can be reacted to quickly

   View case
2. IL-0112 The daily node rollover put DFDS's EKS nodes on an AMI later recalled for a kernel issue, causing "PLEG is not healthy" NodeNotReady flaps and pod network timeouts

   DFDS2022

   Symptoms

   On 2022-10-31 a planned upgrade of the vpc-cni EKS add-on, started from the deployment pipeline at 13:45 UTC, timed out at 14:10. Only about 10 of the 45 aws-node pods had upgraded, 5 were stuck in Terminating and the other 30 had not been attempted.

   Node NotReadyUpgrade stallIntermittent timeoutsIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   At 07:30 UTC on 2022-10-31 the daily node rollover replaced the existing nodes with nodes built from AMI v20221027, the latest AWS EKS node AMI, released on 2022-10-29 and later recalled because of a kernel issue.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Node operating system imageLinux kernelkubeletAWS VPC CNINode launch templateTerraform

   Contributing factor

   No staged rolloutAutomation amplificationOverlapping failuresMonitoring blind spotNo health probes

   Detection

   The team noticed nodes flapping between NodeNotReady and NodeReady ("KubeletNotReady PLEG is not healthy") at 14:30 UTC while watching the stalled vpc-cni upgrade, about seven hours after the rollover. Time to detection was 7 hours. Alerting did not catch the NodeNotReady events or the socket growth.

   Remediation

   • cordoned, drained and deleted 15 stuck nodes one at a time to complete the vpc-cni upgrade
   • changed the Terraform infrastructure-modules so a specific AMI could be set
   • rolled the EC2 Auto Scaling group launch configuration back to the previous known good AMI through the pipeline

   Action items

   • Reach out to teams with suggestions about readiness and liveness probes
   • Create a dashboard for readiness and liveness probe coverage
   • Write a wiki article on readiness and liveness probes and their usefulness
   • Modify infrastructure-modules to allow specifying a particular AMI
   • Schedule a discussion on whether to take the latest AMI immediately and how to test new AMIs before they are deployed
   • Implement alerting on abnormal NodeNotReady events and on increased socket use
   • Create a learning path for Kubernetes within the team
   • Collect logs from nodes centrally
   • Create a Prometheus exporter that retrieves the latest available AMI, with a dashboard and alerts

   Lessons

   When a new node AMI has just been rolled out, upgrading other cluster components on the same day makes it hard to tell which change is causing trouble; here the vpc-cni upgrade on the same day confused matters. Taking the latest AMI automatically with no way to pin one meant a rollback first needed a Terraform change. The team also concluded that it needs better communication paths with application teams during incidents.

   View case
3. IL-0012 CPU limits and an unpatched kernel CFS quota bug throttled multi-threaded services into stalls, failed health checks and timeouts

   Omio2020

   Symptoms

   For about six months, applications on Omio's Google Kubernetes Engine clusters stalled at random: they got stuck, stopped answering health check requests or lost network connections, and nothing the team looked at explained why.

   CPU throttlingProbe failuresHigh error rateHigh latencyIntermittent timeoutsIntermittent connection failures

   Trigger

   Multi-threaded workloads running with CPU limits on nodes whose kernel did not yet have the fix for a known CFS quota bug that causes unnecessary throttling.

   Root cause

   Software defect

   Component

   Container CPU limitLinux kernelkubelet

   Contributing factor

   Unknown limitMonitoring blind spotUnpatched known bug

   Detection

   Months of random stalls and failed health checks led the team to read the cgroup cpu.stat throttling counters inside the pods, which showed far more throttling than the limits should allow.

   Remediation

   • removed CPU limits until the kernel with the CFS bug fix was deployed across all clusters

   Action items

   • Deploy the kernel with the CFS quota bug fix across all clusters
   • Monitor utilisation, saturation and error metrics, API latency and error rates to confirm the change behaves as expected

   Lessons

   A CPU limit is a time quota per 100 ms period, not a share of cores, so a multi-threaded container can be stopped for most of each period long before it uses the cores it was given, and a kernel bug can make that worse. Throttling is invisible in standard Kubernetes metrics and has to be read from the cgroup counters. Removing limits trades away protection against a container that takes a whole node, which is only acceptable when runtimes are tuned.

   View case
4. IL-0057 Higher p99 latency after moving a reverse proxy to EKS, from outgoing connections delayed by a SNAT conntrack race

   Prezi2019

   Symptoms

   Prometheus alerts fired on tail latency: from 7/24, the p99 response time of a few services went up after Prezi moved its Nginx-based reverse proxy, smartgateway, from dedicated Elastic Beanstalk machines onto shared Kubernetes worker nodes. The bump affected only the tail, so the earlier monitoring of average response times would most certainly have missed it.

   High latencyIntermittent timeouts

   Trigger

   Moving the reverse proxy onto shared EKS worker nodes, where its outgoing connections went through source NAT on the node and some SYN packets were dropped by a race in Netfilter's conntrack.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   conntrack tableAWS VPC CNILinux kernelNode operating system image

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaultsUnpatched known bug

   Detection

   Prometheus alerts on p99 latency fired after the reverse proxy migration.

   Remediation

   • added AWS X-Ray tracing and an $upstream_connect_time trace attribute to locate the delay
   • ran more pods of the service on more nodes, which reduced but did not end the delays
   • set AWS_VPC_K8S_CNI_EXTERNALSNAT=true on the AWS VPC CNI to turn off SNAT on the nodes

   Lessons

   Alerting on tail latency instead of averages caught a problem that would otherwise have gone unnoticed, and tracing turned a vague slowdown into a measured connect delay. Delays of exactly 1 or 3 seconds on new outgoing connections point to dropped SYN packets, and on EKS the SNAT done by the VPC CNI is where to look.

   View case
5. IL-0047 Pod-to-pod requests delayed by 5, 10 or 15 seconds because of DNS lookups lost to a conntrack race

   MindTickle2019

   Symptoms

   Pod-to-pod calls were intermittently slow and the web application felt slow overall. A request that pod A sent at time x reached pod B at x + 5s, x + 10s or x + 15s, always a multiple of five seconds.

   Intermittent timeoutsHigh latencyDNS resolution failures

   Trigger

   The C library resolver sent the A and AAAA queries for each lookup on the same port; where DNAT or SNAT translation takes place, a race condition in conntrack sometimes left one of the queries unanswered, and the resolver waited 5 seconds before retrying.

   Root cause

   DNS or network fault

   Component

   conntrack tableClient-side DNS resolver and cacheLinux kernel

   Contributing factor

   Unreviewed defaults

   Detection

   The team noticed intermittent delays in pod-to-pod calls and slowness in the web application, and that the delays were always multiples of five seconds.

   Remediation

   • added the single-request-reopen option to dnsConfig in the deployment specs
   • set GRPC_DNS_RESOLVER=native in the Dockerfiles of gRPC applications so they used the libc resolver
   • checked with tcpdump port 53 that A and AAAA queries left from different ports

   Lessons

   Delays that are exact multiples of five seconds point to DNS lookups being retried after the resolver's 5-second timeout. A resolver option set in the pod spec only helps processes that use the libc resolver; runtimes with their own resolver, such as gRPC with c-ares, ignore it.

   View case

By root cause3