Incident Library
Applied filters ComponentContainer memory limitSymptomOOMKilledFactorIgnored early signalClear allEvery case under the filters, with no sentence; newest first.
Suggested filters Search, and the values found in your words appear here.

Graph

  • Root cause
  • Component
  • Symptom
  • Contributing factor
  • Case

Cases2 cases

1 to 2 of 2

  1. Symptoms

    During a rollout of the Grafana Loki distributor Deployment in one Grafana Cloud Logs environment, the write path went down for about 25 minutes. The newly started distributor pods were OOM-killed over and over, never passed their health and readiness checks, and the rollout stopped making progress.

    Trigger

    Step 1 of moving the Loki ring off a separately deployed key-value store onto embedded memberlist added a new label, gossip_ring_member: 'true', to the distributor pods and Service, together with a small config change, and the change required a rollout of the distributors.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    The first clue was kubectl get pods and the kube_deployment_status_replicas_updated metric showing that only 16 of 140 distributor pods had been updated.

    Remediation
    • scaled the distributor Deployment out horizontally so the load spread over more pods with the new label and the rollout could continue
    • reverted the migration step to end the outage
    • set service_ignored_labels:: [$._config.gossip_member_label] and passed it to k.util.serviceFor so the label is no longer copied into the Service selector
    Action items
    • Update the function that generates a Service from a Deployment or StatefulSet to handle edge cases, including this one
    Lessons

    A Service whose selector is built by copying every label of a workload changes which pods it matches as soon as a new label is added. During a rollout it then matches only the new pods, which receive all the traffic before there are enough of them. A few errors during a rollout in other environments hid the problem, because those environments gave distributors more memory and could absorb the shift. Manifest diffs kept for every pull request made it possible to see that the Service selector had changed.

  2. Symptoms

    On a Saturday at 5:12 pm, Blue Matador's own monitoring raised a SystemOOM event for one node in the production Kubernetes cluster. Four minutes later a second warning reported a low EBS Burst Balance on that node's root volume. CloudWatch data showed the burst balance had actually bottomed out at 5:02 pm, before the memory event; the warning arrived late because EBS metrics lag 10 to 15 minutes.

    Trigger

    Memory use of the fluentd-sumologic log shipper pods grew until the node ran out of memory; log volume in Sumo Logic had been steady, so a burst of logs was not the cause.

    Root cause
    Component
    Contributing factor
    Detection

    Blue Matador's own monitoring product alerted on the SystemOOM event, followed minutes later by a low EBS Burst Balance warning for the same node.

    Remediation
    • restarted all fluentd-sumologic pods so they started with low memory
    • set RUBY_GC_HEAP_OLDOBJECT_LIMIT_FACTOR to 0.9 on the fluentd-sumologic pods
    • added memory requests of 128Mi and limits of 1024Mi, and CPU requests of 100m and limits of 250m, to the fluentd-sumologic pods
    Action items
    • Apply default resource limits and resource quotas so that every pod runs with requests and limits
    Lessons

    When checking for restarted pods, look in every namespace, not only the application one. Set resource requests and limits on every pod, third-party ones in particular, so that one workload cannot exhaust a node. Investigate side signals such as the disk I/O spike while the logs still exist.

Check your cluster for this

These 2 cases involve Container memory limit and Configuration templating. kubegap audits a Kubernetes cluster for gaps like these, read-only, from Claude Code or Codex; its checks cite public reports like the ones in this library.

By root cause2